Overview
Title
To safeguard the rights of workers and protect children by responsibly increasing civil monetary penalties and other means.
ELI5 AI
The LET’S Protect Workers Act wants to make sure workers and children are safe by making bad actions, like breaking work rules or being unsafe, cost a lot more money to the people in charge. This means if someone does something wrong, like not paying workers what they should or letting kids work in unsafe places, they have to pay a big fine.
Summary AI
The bill titled H. R. 9137, known as the “Labor Enforcement to Securely Protect Workers Act” or “LET’S Protect Workers Act,” aims to improve the protection of workers' rights and child safety by increasing civil monetary penalties for various violations. It proposes higher penalties for child labor violations, wage and hour infractions, workplace safety breaches, and unfair labor practices. The bill also includes measures to enforce penalties in cases of non-payment, enhances penalties for mine safety and health violations, and ensures compliance with family and medical leave laws. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of record-keeping for workplace safety and employee rights, and mandates rulemaking by the Secretary of Labor to implement these changes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 9137, also known as the "Labor Enforcement to Securely Protect Workers Act" or the "LET’S Protect Workers Act," was introduced to enhance protections for workers and children by increasing civil penalties and enforcing stricter compliance with labor laws. The bill proposes amendments to several existing laws, including the Fair Labor Standards Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act, among others. The aim is to deter violations such as child labor, wage and hour infractions, and unsafe working conditions, while ensuring compliance through significant penalties for entities that fail to adhere to these regulations.
Summary of Significant Issues
A primary issue with the bill is its significant increase in penalties for various labor-related violations, which may appear punitive without detailed justification or impact analysis, especially for small businesses. The complexity of the bill's language and legal jargon could lead to misinterpretation and unintentional non-compliance, particularly among business owners who lack legal expertise. The bill also fails to provide clear guidelines for determining penalties or a process for contesting them, which raises concerns about fairness and transparency. Additionally, there is a lack of specific enforcement mechanisms and clarity in how these penalties will be monitored and applied consistently.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, the bill aims to improve workplace conditions and safety by deterring employers from flouting labor laws. If effectively implemented, it could lead to safer and more equitable working environments, particularly for vulnerable groups such as children and low-income workers. However, the substantial increase in penalties may lead some businesses, especially smaller ones, to reconsider hiring practices or invest heavily in compliance efforts, potentially impacting job availability or business sustainability in certain sectors.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Employees and Workers: The bill could offer enhanced protection and reassurance that their rights are safeguarded through more enforceable labor standards and significant penalties for violators. Workers might experience an improvement in workplace safety and fairness.
Employers and Small Businesses: While large corporations may have the resources to quickly adapt to these legal changes, small businesses might struggle with the heightened penalties and complex requirements. The sudden implementation of increased fines without clear guidance or support could lead to financial strain, especially for those already operating on thin margins.
Regulatory Authorities: Entities responsible for enforcing the amended laws might see an increase in their workload as they process and address violations under the new regulations. It will require effective training and resource allocation to ensure that the heightened penalties are applied consistently and fairly.
In summary, while H.R. 9137 presents a robust approach to enforcing labor laws more stringently, there is a need for clearer guidelines and support mechanisms to ensure that it achieves its goals without disproportionately affecting small businesses and ensuring equitable application across the board. Proper consideration of these issues could help balance the intent of safeguarding workers' rights with the realities faced by employers.
Financial Assessment
The bill, titled the “Labor Enforcement to Securely Protect Workers Act” or “LET’S Protect Workers Act,” addresses various aspects of worker and child protection through increased civil monetary penalties. Here’s a closer look at the financial aspects presented within the bill:
Summary of Financial References
The bill outlines a comprehensive increase in civil penalties across multiple labor and safety laws. These increases are aimed at enhancing enforcement and compliance with existing regulations.
Child Labor Penalties: The amendments propose that anyone violating child labor provisions may face penalties not exceeding $150,000 and not less than $1,500 per employee affected. If a violation results in death or serious injury of a minor, the penalty could rise to $700,000, but no less than $7,000, with the potential for doubling in cases of repeated or willful violations.
Wage and Hour Violations: Penalties for such violations can now reach up to $25,000 per violation. For repeated or willful violations, this amount can increase to $50,000.
Safety and Health Violations: Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, various penalties are increased. The highest penalty referenced rises from $70,000 to $800,000.
Farmworker Protections: Penalties here are increased significantly from $1,000 to $30,000.
Mine Safety Penalties: The bill suggests various amendments, with specific penalties reaching up to $200,000 for subsequent retaliation offenses.
Family and Medical Leave Violations: Civil money penalties in this area are capped at $25,000 per offense.
Unfair Labor Practices: Employers found committing unfair labor practices could face penalties up to $50,000, which may be doubled to $100,000 for repeated offenses involving serious harm.
Analysis of Financial References in Relation to Identified Issues
One of the primary issues identified in the bill is the significant increase in civil penalties, which could be perceived as punitive. For instance, raising the penalty for certain safety violations from $70,000 to $800,000 without detailed justification or impact analysis may have a disproportionate impact on smaller businesses. Without clear data showing these penalties' effectiveness in improving safety standards, these measures might be more punitive than corrective.
The bill’s complexity, particularly with the higher penalties, could lead to confusion among smaller employers who might lack the resources or legal expertise to understand these changes fully. The language used in describing the financial penalties does not account for the diverse range of businesses it affects, possibly leading to unintentional non-compliance.
Additionally, the lack of specific enforcement mechanisms or monitoring to ensure consistent application of these penalties presents a challenge. While the penalties are designed to deter violations, if not applied consistently or transparently, their effectiveness could be compromised.
Moreover, the absence of detailed criteria or guidelines for determining or contesting penalties, especially in cases involving unfair labor practices, raises concerns about transparency and fairness. Employers may find the process daunting or arbitrary, particularly when penalties can reach up to $100,000 for serious violations.
The recordkeeping and notice requirements are another area where financial implications are significant. Ensuring compliance might demand additional resources from businesses, particularly in cases where overlapping regulations could lead to redundancy and confusion.
Conclusion
Increases in civil monetary penalties as described in the bill aim to strengthen worker protections and ensure compliance with labor laws. However, without a clear rationale and detailed guidelines accompanying these financial references, the amendments may pose challenges, especially for smaller enterprises. The bill outlines significant financial consequences for non-compliance but lacks comprehensive guidance and support frameworks that could aid businesses in adhering to these new standards effectively.
Issues
The significant increase in civil penalties across various labor and safety laws in Section 2 could be viewed as punitive rather than corrective, lacking detailed justification or impact analysis, which may disproportionately impact smaller businesses without achieving the desired safety improvements.
The complexity and lack of clarity in the language used within Section 2 amendments could lead to confusion or misinterpretation by small business owners or operators who may not have legal expertise, potentially resulting in unintentional non-compliance.
Section 4 does not provide clear guidelines on how civil penalties for unfair labor practices are determined or how employers can contest or appeal these penalties, which may raise concerns about fairness and transparency in enforcement.
The bill lacks specific enforcement mechanisms or monitoring details for ensuring compliance with the increased penalties in Section 2, which could lead to inconsistencies in application.
In Section 5, potential redundancy and ambiguity in recordkeeping requirements between different acts may cause confusion and inconsistent application, possibly resulting in unintended non-compliance among employers.
The bill does not provide a rationale for how the increased penalty amounts in Section 2 were determined, raising questions about whether these amounts are proportionate to the violations addressed.
The use of complex legal language in Section 3 involving cross-references within the Employee Retirement Income Security Act could make the bill less accessible and understandable to the general public and stakeholders directly affected by the changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act provides its short title, which is the “Labor Enforcement to Securely Protect Workers Act” and also alternatively called the “LET’S Protect Workers Act.”
2. Improved protection for workers and children through meaningful civil penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section of the bill focuses on increasing civil penalties for various labor-related violations, such as child labor and wage and hour protections, under acts like the Fair Labor Standards Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act, Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, and others. It also introduces new penalties for violations related to mine safety, family, and medical leave, aiming for better protection of workers and stricter enforcement of existing labor laws.
Money References
- (a) Child labor.—Section 16(e)(1)(A) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(e)(1)(A)) is amended to read as follows: “(A) Any person who violates the provisions of sections 12 or 13(c), relating to child labor, or any regulation issued pursuant to such sections, shall be subject to a civil penalty as follows: “(i) Not more than $150,000, but not less than $1,500, for each employee who was the subject of such a violation. “(ii) Not more than $700,000, but not less than $7,000, with regard to each such violation that causes the death or serious injury of any employee under the age of 18 years, which penalty may be doubled where the violation is a repeated or willful violation.”
- (b) Wage and hour protections.—Section 16(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(e)), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended— (1) in paragraph (2)— (A) in the first sentence— (i) by striking “repeatedly or willfully”; and (ii) by striking “not to exceed $1,100 for each such violation” and inserting “not to exceed, for each such violation, $25,000 or, if such a violation is a repeated or willful violation, $50,000”; and (B) in the second sentence, by striking “not to exceed $1,100 for each such violation” and inserting “not to exceed, for each such violation, $25,000 or, if such a violation is a repeated or willful violation, $50,000”; (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as paragraphs (4), (5), and (6), respectively; and (3) by inserting after paragraph (2), as so amended, the following new paragraph: “(3) Any person who violates section 11(c) shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 for each such violation.”
- (c) Workers’ health and safety.—Section 17 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 666) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) by striking “$70,000” and inserting “$800,000”; and (B) by striking “$5,000” and inserting “$60,000”; (2) in subsection (b), by striking “7,000” and inserting “$80,000”; (3) in subsection (c), by striking “$7,000” and inserting “$40,000”; (4) in subsection (d), by striking “$7,000” and inserting “$80,000”; and (5) in subsection (i), by striking “$7,000” and inserting “$40,000”. (d) Farmworker protections.—Section 503(a)(1) of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (29 U.S.C. 1853(a)(1)) is amended by striking “$1,000” and inserting “$30,000”.
- (3) CIVIL PENALTY FOR RETALIATION.—Section 110(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 820(a)) is further amended— (A) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and (B) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following: “(4) If any person violates section 105(c), the Secretary shall propose, and the Commission shall assess, during any 3-year period, a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 or more than $100,000 for the first occurrence of such violation by such person, and not less than $20,000 or more than $200,000 for any subsequent violation by such person.”
- (4) BLACK LUNG BENEFITS PENALTIES.—Section 423(d)(1) Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 933(d)(1)) is amended by striking “$1,000” and inserting “$50,000 but not less than $5,000”.
- — (1) INTERFERENCE WITH RIGHTS AND PROCEEDINGS.—Section 107(b) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2617(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: “(4) CIVIL PENALTY.—In addition to any sums recovered by the Secretary pursuant to paragraph (2), any employer that violates section 105 may be assessed a civil money penalty not to exceed $25,000 for each separate offense.”
- (2) NOTICE.—Section 109(b) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2619(b)) is amended by striking “$100” and inserting “$2,500”.
- (3) RECORDKEEPING.—Section 106(b) of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2616(b)) is amended by adding “Any employer that violates this subsection may be assessed a civil monetary penalty not to exceed $2,500 for each separate offense.” at the end.
3. Enforcement of certain requirements for employee health plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines changes to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, specifically enhancing enforcement related to mental health and substance use disorder benefits by including penalties for plan sponsors, administrators, service providers, or issuers who fail to comply with these requirements. It also modifies existing sections to allow the Secretary to collect civil penalties and enforce rules regarding parity in mental health benefits and the use of genetic information.
4. Improving workplace democracy through civil monetary penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the National Labor Relations Act introduce civil penalties for employers who commit unfair labor practices, with fines up to $50,000 for each violation. If the violation results in serious harm to an employee or is repeated within five years, the fines can be doubled to $100,000, and these penalties apply in addition to any other actions taken by the Board.
Money References
- Section 12 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 162) is amended— (1) by striking “Sec. 12. Any person” and inserting the following: “SEC. 12. Penalties. “(a) Violations for interference with board.—Any person”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “(b) Civil penalties for unfair labor practices.—Any employer who commits an unfair labor practice within the meaning of section 8(a) shall be subject to a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for each such violation, except that, with respect to such an unfair labor practice within the meaning of paragraph (3) or (4) of section 8(a) or such a violation of section 8(a) that results in the discharge of an employee or other serious economic harm to an employee, the Board shall double the amount of such penalty, to an amount not to exceed $100,000, in any case where the employer has within the preceding 5 years committed another such violation of such paragraph (3) or (4) or such violation of section 8(a) that results in such discharge or other serious economic harm.
12. Penalties Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Any individual who interferes with the board can face penalties according to the law.
5. Securing workers’ rights through responsible recordkeeping and notice to employees Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses amendments to existing laws to ensure that violations related to recordkeeping by employers are considered ongoing until the employer complies with the law or the requirement to keep those records ends. It also mandates that the Secretary of Labor update regulations within one year to align with these amendments.
6. Effective dates; application Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments in sections 2, 3, and 4 of this act will be effective starting January 1, 2025, and will apply to violations occurring on or after that date, except for a specific case mentioned in section 2(e)(2)(B). The changes in section 5 will become effective immediately when the act is enacted and will cover violations happening from that date forward.