Overview
Title
To direct the Federal Communications Commission to publish a list of entities that hold authorizations, licenses, or other grants of authority issued by the Commission and that have certain foreign ownership, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants the FCC to make a list of companies that have ties to other countries and can work in America because of special permissions. They will update the list every year so everyone knows which companies are connected to other countries.
Summary AI
The bill, known as the "Foreign Adversary Communications Transparency Act," requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish a list of entities that have certain foreign ownership and hold licenses or authorizations from the FCC. The list must be available on the FCC's website, and the entities listed must have significant connections to foreign governments or companies from specific foreign countries. The FCC must update this list annually and is tasked with establishing rules to gather the necessary information. This legislation aims to enhance transparency regarding foreign influence in communications networks in the United States.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Foreign Adversary Communications Transparency Act," intends to enhance public awareness regarding foreign influence in the telecommunications sector. The bill requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish an online list detailing entities that hold authorizations, licenses, or other grants provided by the FCC and have significant foreign ownership. This measure is aimed at increasing transparency concerning foreign stakes in telecommunications entities operating within the United States.
The Act obligates the FCC to establish rules for collecting information that identifies relevant entities, publish the initial list within 120 days of enactment, update it annually, and is exempt from certain provisions typically required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The definitions used in the bill refer to existing legislation, such as the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019, to clarify terms such as "covered entities" and "appropriate national security agencies."
Summary of Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from the bill's requirements and timelines. Firstly, the aggressive timeframe imposed on the FCC—120 days for rulemaking and one year to place entities on the list—raises concerns about the adequacy and thoroughness of these processes. Such rapid implementation could lead to rushed decisions without comprehensive analysis or stakeholder consultation.
Moreover, the exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act poses potential challenges regarding the balance between efficient data collection and the privacy rights of affected entities. This exemption could result in excessive data collection practices without the usual oversight that ensures data is handled responsibly.
Finally, the bill's reliance on definitions from other legislative acts may introduce complexity and require additional research by stakeholders to understand the requirements fully. This can lead to compliance challenges and potential legal ambiguities, adding another layer of difficulty for affected entities trying to navigate the requirements efficiently.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the legislation aims to provide greater transparency regarding which entities in the telecommunications industry might be influenced by foreign interests. By understanding the ownership landscape, consumers and stakeholders can assess potential risks related to privacy and national security. The publication of such a list could foster a more informed public discourse on the implications of foreign investments in critical sectors like telecommunications.
Impact on Stakeholders
The bill is likely to have varied impacts on different stakeholders. Telecommunications companies with foreign ownership interests could face increased scrutiny and regulatory burden as they comply with reporting and transparency requirements. This may lead to administrative challenges and potential changes in business operations to align with the new regulations.
Conversely, national security agencies and advocates for greater transparency might view the legislation positively. It aligns with their goals of mitigating risks associated with foreign control or influence over vital communication infrastructures.
Furthermore, granting the FCC the authority to issue rules and manage the evaluation process will require significant resource allocation. Without additional funding, the FCC might struggle to fulfill this mandate effectively, potentially impacting its capacity to manage other ongoing responsibilities.
In conclusion, while the "Foreign Adversary Communications Transparency Act" seeks to improve transparency and security in the telecommunications sector, it also presents challenges in terms of implementation timelines and compliance complexity that need careful consideration.
Issues
The aggressive timelines set in Section 2 for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to publish and update a list of entities with certain foreign ownership may result in rushed rulemaking and inadequate processes. Implementation is required within 120 days, and rulemaking within 18 months. This could compromise the thoroughness and quality of the processes.
The exemption from the Paperwork Reduction Act in Section 2(c) potentially allows for excessive data collection without sufficient oversight, increasing risks related to privacy and administrative burden on entities being reported.
References in Section 2(e) to external Acts such as the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act of 2019 and title 10, United States Code, for key definitions may make the legislation less self-contained and more challenging for stakeholders to fully understand without additional research. This complexity could create compliance issues or legal ambiguities.
The requirement in Section 2(d) for the FCC to provide annual updates to the list could require significant, ongoing resource commitments. Without additional funding or resources, this may place a strain on the FCC's capabilities, impacting its effectiveness in fulfilling other responsibilities.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Foreign Adversary Communications Transparency Act is referred to by this short title.
2. List of entities holding FCC authorizations, licenses, or other grants of authority and having certain foreign ownership Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to create an online list of entities with FCC licenses or authorizations that have significant foreign ownership. It mandates setting rules to gather information on these entities, updating the list annually, and exempts this process from certain paperwork regulations.