Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an excise tax credit for certain heavy trucks when operated in power take-off mode.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9059 is like a special coupon for big trucks that use a lot of fuel when working, like trucks with concrete pumps. If the trucks meet the rules, they get to pay less for their fuel, starting in 2025.
Summary AI
H.R. 9059 seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by introducing an excise tax credit specifically for certain heavy trucks that operate in power take-off mode, such as mobile mounted concrete boom pump vehicles. The bill outlines that if these vehicles do not meet specific requirements, they can still qualify for the tax credit, but the payment for gasoline used will be limited to 55 percent of the total tax imposed on the gasoline. These changes would apply to fuel used in taxable years ending after December 31, 2024.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The legislation titled H.R. 9059 seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by introducing an excise tax credit for certain heavy trucks, specifically those operating in power take-off mode. The main focus is on mobile machinery, such as mobile mounted concrete boom pump vehicles, which utilize a power take-off mechanism to function while stationary. These vehicles would be eligible for a tax credit on the gasoline they consume, though this credit is capped at covering just 55% of the fuel tax imposed on the gasoline used in these vehicles. This new amendment is set to apply to fuel used in taxable years ending after December 31, 2024.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is its potential to provide preferential treatment to manufacturers and operators of mobile mounted concrete boom pump vehicles. There is concern that the specific exception may favor certain entities and potentially distort market competition. Additionally, the reason behind the choice to cap the credit at 55% for gasoline usage is not entirely clear and could result in inequities among different vehicle types.
Furthermore, the language used in the bill is complex and might result in ambiguity, especially regarding terms like "related subordinate parts." The intricate calculations and numerous references within the amendments could complicate understanding and compliance for relevant stakeholders.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, the bill's implications are somewhat indirect. By introducing a tax credit for certain heavy trucks, particularly those used in the construction and infrastructure sectors, there could be potential downstream effects such as influencing the cost of services that rely on such vehicles. If operators can benefit from tax credits, it may translate into reduced operational costs and possibly lower prices for end consumers.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders such as operators and manufacturers of the designated heavy trucks, the bill presents potential financial benefits by reducing fuel costs through the excise tax credit. This could incentivize the use of specific machinery types and potentially drive innovation in fuel-efficient technologies. However, these advantages might come at the expense of competitive balance if certain manufacturers or operators gain a higher market share due to these provisions.
Conversely, stakeholders outside the specifically mentioned vehicle categories may perceive the credit cap as unfairly advantageous to mobile mounted concrete boom pump vehicles, raising concerns about equitability across different heavy truck types. Furthermore, stakeholders might need professional advice to navigate the complex language and ensure compliance, potentially increasing operational overheads.
In conclusion, while the bill offers financial benefits for specific truck operators, it raises questions about market fairness and practical implementation challenges that need to be carefully considered.
Issues
The exception provided in subclause II for the 'mobile mounted concrete boom pump vehicle' may favor certain manufacturers or operators, raising concerns about potential preferential treatment, which could lead to market distortions or unfair competition. This issue is found in Section 1.
The cap on the payment at 55 percent for gasoline used in the specified vehicles, as stipulated in subclause II, diverges from standard norms for similar tax credits. The reason for this specific percentage cap might raise fairness and equity concerns among different types of vehicles. This issue is highlighted in Section 1.
The definition of 'related subordinate parts' in subclause III may lead to ambiguity and require further clarification to prevent misinterpretation. This could create uncertainties in implementing the tax credit effectively. This issue is noted in Section 1.
The complexity of the language and structure within the amendments, with multiple references and calculations, might pose challenges for stakeholders to understand and apply the provisions without expert assistance, potentially leading to compliance difficulties. This concern is identified in Section 1.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Excise tax credit for certain concrete pump trucks Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Internal Revenue Code to ensure that certain concrete pump trucks, which meet specific criteria, can qualify for a tax credit on the gasoline they use, but the credit is limited to 55% of the gas tax imposed. The updated rules will start applying to fuel used in tax years ending after December 31, 2024.