Overview

Title

To require the development of a workforce plan for the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 9037 is a bill that asks people in charge of FEMA, who help out when bad things happen like storms or fires, to make a plan to hire and train more workers. They want to make sure they have enough help and that everyone works well together, but they won't get any extra money to do this.

Summary AI

H.R. 9037 is a bill that mandates the creation of a detailed workforce plan for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The plan aims to enhance FEMA's human resources by addressing staffing gaps, developing training programs, and improving efficiency. It requires regular updates every three years and includes provisions for evaluating progress, identifying workforce needs, and implementing cost-effective strategies. Additionally, it ensures compliance with existing practices by integrating recommendations from relevant federal authorities.

Published

2024-12-05
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-12-05
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9037rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,551
Pages:
12
Sentences:
16

Language

Nouns: 480
Verbs: 128
Adjectives: 51
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 45
Entities: 93

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.39
Average Sentence Length:
96.94
Token Entropy:
4.93
Readability (ARI):
51.25

AnalysisAI

The Federal Emergency Mobilization Accountability (FEMA) Workforce Planning Act, introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives as H.R. 9037, mandates the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to develop a comprehensive human capital operating plan. This plan is intended to enhance the agency's workforce efficiency and effectiveness. The bill establishes requirements for a detailed, strategic evaluation of FEMA's workforce to identify and address staffing gaps, improve skills, and increase cost efficiency.

General Summary

The bill primarily requires the FEMA Administrator to create a plan to manage and improve the agency's workforce. This plan must be submitted within a year of the bill's enactment and updated every three years. It should cover various facets, including performance metrics, a detailed analysis of costs, recruitment strategies, and handling workforce attrition. It emphasizes using best practices from the Office of Personnel Management and other authorities in federal workforce management. Importantly, the bill specifies that no new funds will be allocated for implementing the plan.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise with this legislation. First, while the bill calls for performance metrics to evaluate progress, it lacks clear criteria for such evaluations. This absence could result in inefficient oversight and ineffective implementation. Additionally, the bill does not include accountability measures for unmet goals, potentially weakening follow-through and evaluation processes.

Furthermore, by prohibiting additional funding, the bill might limit the plan's effectiveness, especially if existing resources are insufficient. The use of vague terms like "best practices" and "strategies and practices" could lead to varying interpretations and inconsistent application. Complex language used in specifying requirements may also impede understanding among stakeholders. Moreover, terms like "cadre" are not clearly defined, possibly causing confusion. Finally, the plan lacks consideration of systemic workplace issues like culture, which might impact staff retention and morale.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this bill aims to fortify FEMA's workforce to ensure efficient disaster response and management. An effectively enhanced workforce could improve the agency's ability to manage emergencies, ultimately providing better service to communities in crisis.

Impact on Stakeholders

For FEMA Employees: The bill's focus on improving skills and addressing staffing gaps could mean better training and career development opportunities. However, without additional funds, current employees might face increased workloads as the agency attempts to meet new objectives with existing resources.

For Federal Emergency Management: The legislation has the potential to streamline workforce operations, making FEMA more efficient in responding to emergencies. However, without new funding, the agency might struggle with resource allocation, potentially compromising the quality and speed of disaster response.

For Lawmakers and the Government: The bill reflects a legislative push toward more accountability and strategic management in federal agencies. It aligns with broader efforts to enhance federal workforce efficiency, though its success will largely depend on implementation and oversight.

The FEMA Workforce Planning Act represents an ambitious effort to bolster FEMA's workforce efficiency by mandating strategic planning. However, its effectiveness may be tempered by the absence of additional funding, lack of clear evaluative criteria, and potential oversight challenges without robust accountability measures.

Issues

  • The requirement to develop a human capital operating plan under Section 2(b) mandates clarity on performance metrics. The lack of specific criteria to evaluate the effectiveness of progress toward goals could lead to inefficiencies and ineffective oversight.

  • Section 2(d) requires a range of detailed analyses and strategies, yet lacks defined accountability measures in the event that goals are not achieved. This could lead to a lack of proper oversight and follow-up on the plan’s implementation.

  • The prohibition of new funding in Section 2(f) could severely limit the effectiveness of the workforce plan, especially if existing resources are inadequate to meet the goals laid out in the plan.

  • Terms such as 'best practices' and 'strategies and practices' in Section 2(c) are vague and lack precise definitions, potentially leading to inconsistent application and interpretation of the workforce plan.

  • The language in Section 2, particularly in lists of requirements for the plan development and contents, is complex and could be simplified to improve clarity and understanding among stakeholders.

  • The omission of clear definitions for specific terms, like 'cadre' in Section 2(d), could lead to interpretation issues and inconsistent application across different contexts within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

  • Section 2(d) mandates addressing workforce attrition and recruitment, yet neglects to emphasize systemic issues such as workplace culture. Addressing these systemic issues may be crucial to effectively manage staff attrition and enhance recruitment efforts.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act establishes the short title as the “Federal Emergency Mobilization Accountability (FEMA) Workforce Planning Act”.

2. Fema workforce plan Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to create and update a human capital operating plan every three years to improve its workforce. This plan should outline strategies for addressing staffing gaps, enhancing skills, and boosting cost efficiency, among other things, and is to be reviewed for compliance by the Comptroller General without the need for additional funds.