Overview

Title

Making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

This bill is like a big money plan that gives out money to help farmers, make sure our food is safe to eat, make homes nicer in the countryside, and help with food programs. But it also has rules that say "no" to some things, like changing certain food rules or using certain building materials, which might make some people unhappy.

Summary AI

The bill H.R. 9027 is designed to allocate funds for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, to support programs related to Agriculture, Rural Development, the Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies in the United States. It includes appropriations for a variety of activities such as agricultural research, food safety, rural housing, nutrition assistance programs, and international food aid. The bill also imposes certain restrictions and guidelines on how funds can be used, and includes provisions related to food labeling, environmental requirements, and the regulatory oversight of agricultural and nutritional programs. Additionally, it specifies several program eligibility rules and administrative procedures to ensure the effective implementation of the funded programs.

Published

2024-07-12
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-07-12
Package ID: BILLS-118hr9027rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
75
Words:
28,753
Pages:
130
Sentences:
430

Language

Nouns: 8,979
Verbs: 2,280
Adjectives: 1,780
Adverbs: 349
Numbers: 1,586
Entities: 1,791

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.67
Average Sentence Length:
66.87
Token Entropy:
5.89
Readability (ARI):
37.88

AnalysisAI

The bill under consideration, H.R. 9027, is a comprehensive funding proposal for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025. It seeks to allocate federal government funds to various agricultural and food programs, including initiatives in rural development, support for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and associated agencies.

General Summary

H.R. 9027 is designed to distribute financial resources to agricultural programs, rural development projects, and the FDA, with specific appropriations for agricultural research, food safety inspections, rural utilities, and housing, among other areas. The act spans a wide array of programs, detailing how federal funds should be allocated for each segment. The bill includes notable conditions and restrictions related to the use of federal funds, including prohibitions on implementing certain regulations and guidelines.

Significant Issues

One prominent issue within the bill is the prohibition on promoting or advancing Critical Race Theory through federally funded programs. This restriction raises concerns about academic freedom and could provoke legal challenges related to free speech. Another point of contention is the limitations on implementing new FDA rules regarding menthol in cigarettes and flavored cigars, which could slow regulatory actions aimed at protecting public health.

The bill also restricts funding for USDA-financed housing under updated efficiency standards, potentially impacting energy consumption and overall housing energy costs in the future. Additionally, various sections address prohibitions on spending for excessive labeling requirements, such as the mandate for the term "genetically engineered" to appear in the market names of certain animals, potentially imposing additional costs on companies.

Impact on the Public

The bill's wide-ranging financial allocations aim to support a variety of programs crucial to agriculture, food safety, and rural development. While it appears to provide clear direction on funding, several prohibitions and conditions could influence the effectiveness of certain policies, such as energy efficiency improvements or public health guidelines concerning sodium reduction. These conditions might delay necessary updates, ultimately affecting public benefit from these programs.

Impact on Stakeholders

Certain stakeholder groups might be positively or negatively impacted by the bill's provisions. Educational institutions discussing Critical Race Theory could face restrictions due to the funding prohibition, affecting curricular development. On the other hand, food industry stakeholders might benefit from the FDA's slowed progress on sodium reduction guidelines and tobacco regulation changes.

Rural communities could be significantly influenced by restrictions on using non-U.S. materials for rural development projects, potentially raising costs and affecting project feasibility. Meanwhile, USDA programs focused on agriculture and rural development could struggle under restricted funds from user fees, limiting their self-financing capabilities.

Overall, while H.R. 9027 seeks to distribute federal resources across essential sectors, its conditions and prohibitions could have a wide-ranging impact on the ability to effectively adapt to evolving public health, educational, and developmental needs.

Financial Assessment

The bill H.R. 9027 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2025, encompasses a vast array of financial allocations for programs in Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and related agencies. These appropriations are aimed at ensuring comprehensive support across various sectors including agricultural research, nutrition assistance, food safety, rural housing, and international food aid.

Financial Allocations Overview

The bill outlines numerous appropriations, such as $40,457,000 for the Office of the Secretary and $31,025,000 for the Office of the Chief Economist. It designates funds for agricultural research, exemplified by $1,793,829,000 allocated to the Agricultural Research Service for salaries and expenses. Furthermore, there is a specific appropriation for Rural Development, including $346,087,000 for Rural Development salaries and expenses, and $493,230,000 for rural community facilities programs. These investments aim to uphold and progress various critical domains within agricultural and rural policies.

Link to Identified Issues

Several sections of the bill have been tagged as potentially contentious. For instance, the restriction under Section 744 disallowing funds to promote or advance Critical Race Theory might be seen as limiting educational and academic freedom, despite not directly affecting financial allocations. Moreover, the bill's prohibition on implementing FDA rules regarding menthol in cigarettes, as seen in Section 733, may enable tobacco industries to resist compliance costs, though potentially at the risk of public health.

Another issue is illustrated in Section 764, which mandates genetically engineered animals to be labeled with “genetically engineered,” potentially imposing additional labeling costs on producers. While this speaks to consumer transparency, it might also lead to a debate on economic implications for affected companies.

Similarly, Section 757 highlights a restriction on adopting sodium reduction guidelines without prior assessment. This restricts potentially beneficial public health advances, hinting at a possible financial underpinning driven by food industry influences concerned with adapting to abrupt regulatory changes.

In Section 743, funds are prohibited from enforcing updated energy efficiency standards, which might lead to long-term costs due to inefficiencies. The lack of enforcement could increase energy consumption, adding expenses that could have been mitigated through updated regulations.

Another financial consideration comes from the $50,000,000 rescinded from the Natural Resources Conservation Service under Section 765. This reduction may influence conservation operations and suggests a balancing act between present fiscal constraints and future environmental investments.

Conclusion

The appropriations within this bill have far-reaching implications spanning across numerous sectors. While primarily focused on agricultural and rural support, the financial stipulations interact complexly with regulatory and policy debates, including public health, academic freedom, and environmental sustainability. The careful delineation of funds reflects competing priorities and the intricate balance Congress must manage in allocating limited resources to varied, yet interconnected, programmatic needs.

Issues

  • The prohibition on funds being used to carry out any program, project, or activity that promotes or advances Critical Race Theory or any concept associated with it may stifle academic freedom and provoke legal challenges about free speech or educational rights. [Section 744]

  • The prohibition on the implementation, administration, or enforcement of certain FDA rules regarding menthol in cigarettes and characterizing flavors in cigars may hinder prompt regulatory actions that could benefit public health, potentially protecting tobacco industry interests. [Section 733]

  • The requirement to include 'genetically engineered' in market names for engineered animals could incur additional labeling costs for companies without discussing funding or financial assistance, potentially affecting market fairness. [Section 764]

  • The section that prevents spending for implementing sodium reduction guidelines without a prior assessment might delay beneficial public health guidelines and could be perceived as accommodating food industry interests. [Section 757]

  • The restriction on updating minimum energy efficiency standards for USDA-financed housing could hinder efforts to improve energy efficiency, potentially leading to increased energy consumption and costs in the long term. [Section 743]

  • The prohibition on funds for enforcing FDA rules for specific agricultural products like wine grapes and almonds might result in inconsistent safety standards and lack of oversight, potentially seen as favoritism towards certain industries. [Section 738]

  • Soon after the closure of an Agricultural Research Service Facility, the conveyance authority allowing transfer of property without clarity on when consideration is required might lead to favored treatment of certain institutions. [Section 759]

  • Approval by the Secretary of Agriculture for loan program level increases without specified conditions could lead to potential excessive increases and prioritization without adequate oversight. [Section 724]

  • Exemption from usual aggregate limits for APHIS employee premium pay in response to animal disease outbreaks could result in significant additional expenses without clear criteria for the same. [Section 761]

  • The requirement that foreign-produced iron and steel not be used in certain rural development projects may impact costs and effectiveness, with vague waiver criteria potentially leading to inconsistent applications. [Section 734]

  • Limit on the use of funds for the development of user fees underlines financial pressure on agency capabilities for execution of their activities, potentially impacting self-financing options. [Section 728]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill allocates funds from the Treasury for programs related to Agriculture, Rural Development, the Food and Drug Administration, and other connected agencies for the fiscal year ending on September 30, 2025.

701. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is allowed to use funds from this Act to buy new cars for the department, as long as the total number of cars does not exceed the number from 2018. Before buying more cars, the Secretary must decide that the new vehicles are needed for safety, cost-saving, or protecting people and property, and cannot increase the number of cars from 2018 without getting approval from Congress within 30 days.

702. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is allowed to move unused funds to improve financial and tech services in the Department of Agriculture, with strict conditions requiring prior approvals from agency heads and Congress. The funds are primarily for the Department's benefit, especially for the National Finance Center, which must remain under specific management and can use a small part for new equipment and emergencies.

703. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In SECTION 703, the law states that unless specifically mentioned otherwise, money allocated in this Act cannot be used beyond the end of the current fiscal year.

704. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Funds from this Act cannot be used to pay more than 10% of the total direct cost as indirect costs on agreements between the USDA and nonprofit organizations if the purpose is mutual interest programs. However, the Act allows for normal payment of indirect costs on grants or contracts if they apply a similar cost basis to all agencies funded by this Act.

705. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Department of Agriculture can use its current year's funding for direct and guaranteed loans until the money is completely used up, as long as these loans are for specific programs: the Rural Development Loan Fund, Rural Electrification and Telecommunication Loans, and the Rural Housing Insurance Fund.

706. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that the Department of Agriculture cannot use funds from this Act to get new technology systems or major upgrades without approval from the Chief Information Officer and a review board. It also specifies that funds over $25,000 require written approval, but for projects up to $250,000, the Chief Information Officer may allow spending without written approval based on the agency's performance.

Money References

  • Provided further, That notwithstanding section 11319 of title 40, United States Code, none of the funds available to the Department of Agriculture for information technology shall be obligated for projects, contracts, or other agreements over $25,000 prior to receipt of written approval by the Chief Information Officer:
  • Provided further, That the Chief Information Officer may authorize an agency to obligate funds without written approval from the Chief Information Officer for projects, contracts, or other agreements up to $250,000 based upon the performance of an agency measured against the performance plan requirements described in the explanatory statement accompanying Public Law 113–235.

707. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Funds provided under section 524(b) of the Federal Crop Insurance Act are allowed to be used until they are completely spent, regardless of the fiscal year in which they were allocated.

708. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Any former borrowers from the Rural Utilities Service who have paid back their loans under the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as well as nonprofit utilities eligible for such loans, can receive assistance in the same way as current borrowers under this law.

709. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that, unless a law says otherwise, up to $20 million of unspent money from the budget for wages and running costs for the Farm Service Agency can be used until September 30, 2026, specifically for technology-related expenses.

Money References

  • Except as otherwise specifically provided by law, not more than $20,000,000 in unobligated balances from appropriations made available for salaries and expenses in this Act for the Farm Service Agency shall remain available through September 30, 2026, for information technology expenses. ---

710. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that no money from this Act can be used for employees of the agencies it funds to travel first-class if it goes against specific federal regulations.

711. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that funds from the Commodity Credit Corporation can be used for salaries and administrative expenses when implementing certain programs from the Agricultural Act of 2014. These funds can be used without being subject to limitations on fund transfers or allotments.

712. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that up to $2,900,000 can be used from the funds provided by the Act for the necessary expenses of the Department of Agriculture's advisory committees, panels, commissions, and task forces. This excludes panels involved in negotiated rule-making and those assessing competitively awarded grants.

Money References

  • Of the funds made available by this Act, not more than $2,900,000 shall be used to cover necessary expenses of activities related to all advisory committees, panels, commissions, and task forces of the Department of Agriculture, except for panels used to comply with negotiated rule makings and panels used to evaluate competitively awarded grants. ---

713. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that funds from this Act cannot be used to create or maintain a computer network unless it blocks access to pornography. However, this restriction does not apply to funds used by law enforcement or other entities for criminal investigations or legal activities.

714. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section sets a limit on how much money can be used for certain food programs under section 32 of a 1935 law, capping it at about $1.43 billion. It also specifies that some funds will not be available for certain activities until October 1, 2025, and any unused funds at that time can be carried over to the next year, but with restrictions on their use.

Money References

  • Notwithstanding subsection (b) of section 14222 of Public Law 110–246 (7 U.S.C. 612c–6; in this section referred to as “section 14222”), none of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this or any other Act shall be used to pay the salaries and expenses of personnel to carry out a program under section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935 (7 U.S.C. 612c; in this section referred to as “section 32”) in excess of $1,427,930,000 (exclusive of carryover appropriations from prior fiscal years), as follows: Child Nutrition Programs Entitlement Commodities—$485,000,000; State Option Contracts—$5,000,000; Removal of Defective Commodities—$1,660,000; Administration of section 32 Commodity Purchases—$37,178,000: Provided, That none of the funds made available in this Act or any other Act shall be used for salaries and expenses to carry out in this fiscal year section 19(i)(1)(E) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, as amended, except in an amount that excludes the transfer of $195,000,000 of the funds to be transferred under subsection (c) of section 14222 of Public Law 110–246, until October 1, 2025:
  • Provided further, That $195,000,000 made available on October 1, 2025, to carry out section 19(i)(1)(E) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, as amended, shall be excluded from the limitation described in subsection (b)(2)(A)(x) of section 14222 of Public Law 110–246 for fiscal year 2026:
  • Provided further, That of the total funds made available in the matter preceding this proviso that remain unobligated on October 1, 2025, such unobligated balances shall carryover into fiscal year 2026 and shall remain available until expended for any of the purposes of section 32, except that any such carryover funds used in accordance with clause (3) of section 32 may not exceed $350,000,000 and may not be obligated until the Secretary of Agriculture provides written notification of the expenditures to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress at least two weeks in advance:

715. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress has included a rule in Section 715 that prohibits using federal funds to pay government workers who write budget proposals assuming income from new user fees unless those fees have already been made into law, or the budget clearly states how it will cut spending if the fees are not approved before a committee meets to work on the 2025 budget.

716. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section restricts the use of funds provided by this Act, or previous acts, to agencies unless specific conditions are met. It prohibits actions like creating new programs or reorganizing offices without prior notification and approval from Congress, ensuring that any significant changes to funding, personnel, or programs undergo scrutiny and receive advance approval.

Money References

  • (b) None of the funds provided by this Act, or provided by previous Appropriations Acts to the agencies funded by this Act that remain available for obligation or expenditure in the current fiscal year, or provided from any accounts in the Treasury derived by the collection of fees available to the agencies funded by this Act, shall be available for obligation or expenditure for activities, programs, or projects through a reprogramming or use of the authorities referred to in subsection (a) involving funds in excess of $500,000 or 10 percent, whichever is less, that— (1) augments existing programs, projects, or activities; (2) reduces by 10 percent funding for any existing program, project, or activity, or numbers of personnel by 10 percent as approved by Congress; or (3) results from any general savings from a reduction in personnel which would result in a change in existing programs, activities, or projects as approved by Congress; unless the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or the Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (as the case may be) notifies in writing and receives approval from the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress at least 30 days in advance of the reprogramming or transfer of such funds or the use of such authority. (c) The Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or the Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall notify in writing and receive approval from the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress before implementing any program or activity not carried out during the previous fiscal year unless the program or activity is funded by this Act or specifically funded by any other Act.
  • (d) None of the funds provided by this Act, or provided by previous Appropriations Acts to the agencies funded by this Act that remain available for obligation or expenditure in the current fiscal year, or provided from any accounts in the Treasury derived by the collection of fees available to the agencies funded by this Act, shall be available for— (1) modifying major capital investments funding levels, including information technology systems, that involves increasing or decreasing funds in the current fiscal year for the individual investment in excess of $500,000 or 10 percent of the total cost, whichever is less; (2) realigning or reorganizing new, current, or vacant positions or agency activities or functions to establish a center, office, branch, or similar entity with five or more personnel; or (3) carrying out activities or functions that were not described in the budget request; unless the agencies funded by this Act notify, in writing, the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress at least 30 days in advance of using the funds for these purposes.

717. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is allowed to charge a one-time fee for any guaranteed business and industry loan, but this fee cannot be more than 3% of the guaranteed principal amount of the loan. This is an exception to a specific section of a larger agricultural law.

718. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Funds allocated to certain government agencies, like the Department of Agriculture and the FDA, cannot be used to share reports or responses from the appropriations hearing process with people outside of these agencies.

719. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that unless there is a law already allowing it, no government agency can use funds from this Act to create news stories meant for the U.S. public without clearly stating in the story that it was made or funded by that agency.

720. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Employees of the Department of Agriculture cannot be transferred to a different agency or office for more than 60 days in a fiscal year unless the agency receiving the employee pays back the employee's original agency for their salary and expenses during the transfer period.

721. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section requires the Secretary of Agriculture, the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, the Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the Chairman of the Farm Credit Administration to submit a detailed spending plan to Congress within 30 days of the bill's enactment. This plan must cover all funds available under the Act, including user fees, detailing how they will be spent by program, project, and activity.

722. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to define "natural cheese" as cheese made by specific coagulation processes or in line with set standards, and requires that the label "natural cheese" can only be used if the cheese meets this definition. Additionally, it ensures national consistency in labeling by updating related sections of the Act.

723. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that when deciding who is eligible for help from Rural Housing Service programs, the Secretary should not count people who are in prison.

724. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is allowed to increase the amount of certain loans and loan guarantees by up to 25% without needing more budget authority, as long as they inform the Committees on Appropriations in both the House and the Senate at least 15 days before making the change.

725. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that credit card refunds or rebates transferred to the Working Capital Fund cannot be used without prior written notification to and approval from Congress. These funds can only be used for buying or improving property, plant, and equipment needed for better financial and IT services at the Department of Agriculture, including cloud technology.

726. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The government will not use funds from this Act to enforce the "variety" rules from a 2016 SNAP regulation until the Secretary of Agriculture changes the definition of "variety" to allow more items to qualify in each staple food category. Until these changes are made, the rules in place before the 2014 Agricultural Act will continue to apply to SNAP retailers.

727. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section grants the Secretary of Agriculture the same authority over certain guaranteed loans and eligible lenders under the Housing Act of 1949 as already provided under a different section of the same Act.

728. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the United States Department of Agriculture from using any funds from the Act to propose, finalize, or implement regulations that would create new user fees according to a specific U.S. Code, starting from the date this Act is enacted.

729. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill section prohibits the use of government funds to create or enforce several specific agriculture-related rules published by the Department of Agriculture, including those on poultry grower contracting, market integrity, and unfair practices. However, it does allow funds to be used to withdraw or cancel these rules and to notify those affected by any investigations or enforcement actions under these rules.

730. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section allows the Secretary to charge establishments for FSIS inspection services outside of regular hours and on holidays. The money collected is considered overtime or holiday pay and is used to cover additional inspection costs without needing more funding approval.

731. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is required to conduct audits in different countries or regions, evaluating factors like veterinary control, disease history, livestock traceability, and emergency responses. The findings from these audits must be shared with the public, while ensuring that they align with U.S. obligations under international trade agreements.

732. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

A bank mentioned in 12 U.S.C. 2128 is allowed to make loans and offer financial help to cooperatives and other non-federal entities in rural areas for things like waste processing or disposal, setting up telecommunications, and producing electricity for use or sale.

733. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

None of the funds from this Act can be used by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to introduce or implement new rules about tobacco products, like banning menthol cigarettes or setting nicotine limits, until the FDA completes a list of specific actions, including updating enforcement guidance, requiring foreign manufacturer registration, coordinating with customs on imports, and reporting progress to Congress.

734. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Federal funds for rural water and waste projects can only be used if the iron and steel products are made in the U.S., but exceptions are allowed if it goes against public interest, if U.S.-made products aren't available or cost too much, and if plans were approved before the law was passed. The Secretary will oversee this and allow the public to give input on requests for exceptions.

735. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Section 735 states that the money provided by this law cannot be used to try to influence Congress on any law or funding issues, except for communicating with Members of Congress in a way allowed by law.

736. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that at least 10% of funds from specified rural development programs be dedicated to areas known as "persistent poverty counties," which are counties or U.S. territories where 20% or more of the population has lived in poverty for the past 30 years. This allocation applies, even if some activities are funded through different means, and includes county seats slightly exceeding population limits.

737. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

None of the funds from this Act can be used for acknowledging or processing applications for drug or biological research that involves creating or altering human embryos to include genetic changes that can be passed on. If such an application is submitted, it will be treated as if it was never received and the research cannot proceed.

738. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that no funds provided by this or any other law can be used to enforce certain FDA rules about growing and handling produce, specifically when it comes to wine grapes, hops, pulse crops, or almonds.

739. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

For the school years 2024–2025 and 2025–2026, this section states that the funds from this Act cannot be used to stop schools from substituting vegetables for fruits in the school breakfast program as outlined in the Child Nutrition Act of 1966.

740. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the use of funds from this or any other Act to go against specific agricultural laws or to ban the movement, processing, sale, or use of legally grown hemp.

741. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is allowed to waive the requirement for matching funds as specified in section 412(g) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998.

742. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In Section 742, the bill states that no government funds can be used to create or enforce any rule that would lower the monthly milk allowance in a specific federal nutrition program, known as WIC, based on regulations from April 2023. This includes not allowing changes proposed by the Department of Agriculture in April 2024.

743. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

None of the money from this Act can be used by the Department of Agriculture to enforce new energy efficiency rules for housing they finance, as mentioned in a specific government notice.

744. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

None of the money given by this Act can be used for any program or activity that supports or teaches Critical Race Theory or related ideas.

745. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Manufacturers can keep following old FDA rules for labeling food as "healthy" until the compliance date given in a new FDA final rule. During this time, no state can impose different rules from either the old or the updated federal standards for "healthy" labels.

746. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Funds from the Food for Peace Act can only be used to help countries facing food shortages if there are proper monitoring systems in place, as decided by the Administrator, to ensure the food aid reaches those who truly need it and isn’t misused.

747. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

None of the funds from this Act can be used to buy poultry or seafood from China for the school lunch and breakfast programs in the U.S.

748. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

For the school year 2025–2026, only those school food authorities with a negative balance in their nonprofit school food service accounts as of June 30, 2024, must set the price for paid lunches according to specific federal guidelines.

749. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that any funds the Secretary withholds under a specified law can be used for grants focused on biotechnology risk assessment research. Additionally, the Secretary is allowed to move these funds within different parts of the Department of Agriculture to support the grants.

750. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Funds from the Department of Agriculture cannot be used to relocate any staff office or agency from their mission area as of August 1, 2018, to a different mission area without a new law specifically allowing this move.

751. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary can use funds from this Act or any other Act to support programs that help prevent floods and protect watersheds. These include the Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations Program, the Watershed Rehabilitation Program, and the Emergency Watershed Protection Program. The funds can be used for technical services related to these programs, even if it contradicts certain sections of previous laws.

752. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In administering a pilot program from the 2018 Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public Law 115–141) for rural assistance, the Secretary of Agriculture can include communities identified as "Areas Rural in Character" for eligible assistance. However, only up to 10% of funds from the "Distance Learning, Telemedicine, and Broadband Program" can be used for this specific purpose.

753. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section specifies that funds from this Act cannot be used by certain officials, including the Secretary of Agriculture and others, to display any flag at their facilities except for the U.S. flag, the flag of a U.S. state, territory, or the District of Columbia, a tribal government flag, an official flag of a U.S. department or agency, or the Prisoners of War/Missing in Action flag.

754. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that $40 million from the unused funds initially provided for the Agricultural Appropriations Act of 2010 will be taken back. However, funds marked as an emergency requirement by Congress are protected and will not be rescinded.

Money References

  • SEC. 754. Of the unobligated balances from amounts made available to carry out section 749(g) of the Agricultural Appropriations Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–80), $40,000,000 are hereby rescinded:

755. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that no funds provided by this or any other law can be used to execute or support certain executive orders and action plans related to racial equity, diversity, and inclusion within the Federal Government, or to establish a Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer.

756. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the use of any funds from the Act by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to create or promote new rules for food manufacturers about Listeria monocytogenes until the FDA takes into account the latest scientific research when developing its guidelines, particularly for foods that do not help Listeria grow.

757. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section prohibits the Food and Drug Administration from using funds from this Act to create or promote new guidelines or regulations for food manufacturers that aim to reduce sodium in the general population over the long term until a study is conducted to evaluate the effects of current short-term sodium reduction efforts.

758. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section specifies that federal funds cannot be used to penalize individuals for actions based on their religious beliefs about marriage being between a man and a woman. It defines discriminatory actions, like altering tax status or withholding federal benefits, and ensures that individuals maintain accreditation, licensure, or certification under federal law if such penalties are due to their religious convictions.

759. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to close an agricultural research laboratory in East Lansing, Michigan, and can transfer ownership of the property, with or without payment, to a land grant college or university that originally owned the land.

760. Hemp Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the definition of "hemp" in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to specify that hemp refers to parts of the Cannabis plant with a THC concentration of 0.3% or less, and it excludes certain products and seeds. It also defines "hemp-derived cannabinoid product" as any product made from hemp for human or animal use, excluding industrial hemp.

761. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

APHIS employees who work on animal disease outbreaks can receive premium pay without it being limited by usual pay caps, and this rule is treated as if it started on January 1, 2023.

762. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that no funds from this Act can be used to pay for personnel to inspect horses under certain sections of federal laws and regulations related to meat inspection and agriculture.

763. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine have been asked to give advice on alcohol consumption to help create the 2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The Secretaries of Health and Human Services and Agriculture must use this advice, and the guidelines should be based on the best available scientific research.

764. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Any engineered animal that was approved before February 19, 2019, must have the words "genetically engineered" included in its market name, regardless of any other law.

765. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that $50 million from unused funds allocated for conservation activities under the "Natural Resources Conservation Service—Conservation Operations" will be taken back. However, it ensures that no funds will be taken from amounts deemed necessary for emergencies by Congress.

Money References

  • SEC. 765. Of the unobligated balances from prior year appropriations made available for conservation activities under the heading “Natural Resources Conservation Service—Conservation Operations”, $50,000,000 are hereby rescinded:

766. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture can join the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to assess transactions involving agriculture if they might affect national security. They need to alert the committee about land deals or investments that could be risky, especially if they involve certain foreign governments.

767. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Department of Agriculture's agencies and offices can use their allocated funds to reimburse the Office of the General Counsel for services provided under temporary agreements. This reimbursement authority is in addition to any other authorized transfer of funds by law.

768. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section forbids the use of funds from the Act for enforcing the "Requirements for Additional Traceability Records for Certain Foods" until the FDA finishes at least four pilot projects testing food traceability with industry partners. Additionally, the compliance date for the rule must be extended to at least two years after these projects are successfully completed.

769. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Health and Human Services, along with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, has 120 days to create a plan for potentially setting up an Abraham Accords Bureau within the Food and Drug Administration. This plan will involve working with the Department of State and governments involved in the Abraham Accords to decide the bureau's location, responsibilities, and staffing needs.

770. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 and the Livestock Mandatory Reporting Act of 1999 by extending the expiration date from 2024 to 2025.

771. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section states that funds from this Act cannot be used by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to process certain requests from companies controlled by China or other foreign countries of concern, unless those companies received prior approval from the Secretary of Agriculture. Additionally, processing will resume only after the Secretary of Agriculture confirms to Congress that China is meeting its agricultural biotechnology commitments from the 2020 trade agreement.

772. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Agriculture is required to update food packages to include peanut-containing foods for infants within 180 days of the law's enactment, ensuring these foods are safe according to the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. "Covered Food Packages" refers to specific food packages defined by federal regulations and recently revised by the Department of Agriculture.

773. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Agricultural Marketing Service is required to regularly test incoming molasses at northern border entry points to ensure it meets U.S. standards, with results shared with Customs and Border Protection and made publicly available. The service must implement this within 180 days and report on the progress to the Appropriations Committees.

774. Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section labeled SEC. 774 indicates that there is $0 specified, suggesting no funds are allocated or required for this section.

Money References

  • SEC. 774. $0. ---