Overview
Title
To establish a uniform definition of rural area for all rural development programs administered by the Department of Agriculture.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 9019 is like a big rulebook that wants to make sure everyone understands what the word "rural" means the same way when the Department of Agriculture helps small towns and farms. It plans to change some old rules to match up and let the Agriculture boss figure out how to make it all work smoothly.
Summary AI
H.R. 9019 aims to create a consistent definition of "rural area" for all rural development programs under the Department of Agriculture. This bill proposes changes to existing laws, such as the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act and the Rural Electrification Act, to ensure that the definition of "rural area" is uniform across various statutes. It also includes amendments to the Housing Act of 1949 to align the definition across different sectors. The bill specifies that these changes will take effect 180 days after its enactment, and it mandates the Secretary of Agriculture to develop necessary rules for implementation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
H.R. 9019, titled the "Rural Area Population Act," aims to create a uniform definition of what constitutes a "rural area" for all rural development programs administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The bill proposes amendments to the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, aligning the definition across various related laws. The central change involves replacing the term "urbanized" with "urban," which may alter the eligibility criteria for certain areas. The bill sets an effective date of 180 days post-enactment and instructs the Secretary of Agriculture to develop rules necessary for implementing these new definitions.
Significant Issues
A significant issue raised by the bill is the change from "urbanized" to "urban" in defining rural areas. This adjustment might affect which areas qualify as "rural" under USDA programs, potentially altering funding or support eligibility. However, the bill does not provide details on how this change impacts the scope of these areas, leading to potential ambiguity.
The implementation period of 180 days is another notable aspect, as the bill does not clarify why this timeframe is necessary. This lack of rationale may result in uncertainty or delays in rolling out the new definitions, affecting stakeholders dependent on USDA rural programs.
Additionally, the bill entrusts the Secretary of Agriculture with rulemaking responsibilities without explicit guidance, which might lead to varied interpretations of how the new definitions should be implemented. This open-ended directive could result in inconsistencies in program application and oversight.
The repeated references to the definition without providing the updated details could leave gaps in understanding for those impacted, leading to confusion among stakeholders and affecting consistent application across regions.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the public might experience changes in which communities qualify as rural, affecting which areas can access USDA rural development resources. These adjustments could lead to shifts in where federal support is directed, influencing local economies and community development opportunities.
Specific stakeholders, such as rural communities, local governments, and developers, may be affected positively or negatively. Areas that are newly classified as rural might benefit from additional funding and support. Conversely, regions previously considered rural might lose access to essential programs, impacting economic development and infrastructure projects.
Farmers, agricultural businesses, and other entities relying on USDA rural programs could face significant changes in eligibility and need to adjust their operations accordingly. The uncertainty around rulemaking and the definition changes might necessitate strategic planning and advocacy to ensure continued support and clarify any new benefits or restrictions imposed by the redefined rural classification.
Issues
The definition changes from 'urbanized' to 'urban' in Section 343(a)(13) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act could significantly alter the classification of what constitutes a 'rural area', impacting eligibility for various USDA rural development programs. The lack of clarity regarding these changes may lead to disputes or confusion in program implementation. [Section 2(a)]
The omission of a rationale for the 180-day implementation period creates uncertainty around the urgency or effects of the changes made by the bill, potentially delaying important updates to program administration. [Section 2(d)]
The broad directive for rulemaking given to the Secretary of Agriculture without specific guidance may result in varied interpretations and implementations, impacting consistency and fairness in the application of the law. [Section 2(e)]
Repeated references to the definition of 'rural area' without an updated or detailed definition in the text leave gaps that may affect the understanding of its implications across different regions and stakeholders. [Section 2(a)]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official name of the law is the “Rural Area Population Act.”
2. Uniform definition of rural area for USDA rural development programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends various parts of existing laws to create a uniform definition of "rural area" for USDA rural development programs by changing specific terms in the laws and aligning them with the definition in the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act. It also provides a timeline of 180 days for these changes to take effect and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish necessary rules for implementation.