The bill titled H. R. 9014 proposes an amendment to title 5 of the United States Code. Its primary aim is to set and clarify the time limits—known as statutes of limitations—for individuals seeking legal remedies in response to agency actions. It is an effort to streamline the process and ensure clarity for those who might be adversely affected by such actions.

General Summary of the Bill

At its core, the bill aims to provide a clear framework around the timeframe within which legal actions can be initiated against agency decisions. Section 1 introduces the bill under the short title "Corner Post Reversal Act." Section 2 proposes an amendment stating that unless a different law specifies otherwise, any legal action must be started within six years from when the agency action was finalized. This implies that once a governmental agency finalizes a decision, affected parties would have a six-year window to contest it legally.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the bill:

1. Ambiguity: The phrase "Except as otherwise expressly provided by law" in Section 2 is vague. It does not specify what exceptions might apply or where these exceptions could be found. This could lead to varying interpretations and a lack of consistency in applying the statute of limitations.

2. Complexity: The requirement that actions be commenced within six years of a decision being "finalized" could be complex and confusing. The exact date when an agency action is considered "finalized" might require legal interpretation, potentially complicating matters for those seeking to challenge a decision.

3. Lack of Context: Section 1 provides the bill's short title without elaborating on its purpose. This lack of detail could lead to misunderstandings about the bill's objectives and its broader impact.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill could enhance clarity and predictability for those looking to initiate legal action against agency decisions. By setting a standardized timeframe, individuals and organizations can better plan their legal strategies. However, the bill's ambiguous and complex language regarding exceptions and the definition of "finalized" actions may also create hurdles. If potential litigants misinterpret these terms, they may miss their opportunity to file a claim, leaving them without legal recourse.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, including individuals adversely affected by agency actions, attorneys, and advocacy groups, could experience both positive and negative impacts:

• Positively, the bill provides a clear timeframe, increasing legal predictability and aiding in strategy formulation. It might prevent agencies from delaying actions excessively, knowing a clear limitation period applies.

• Negatively, stakeholders may face difficulties in determining precisely when the statute of limitations begins, especially if agency actions are phased or complex. The ambiguity of exceptions could also lead to uncertainty and potential disputes in court, increasing legal costs and reducing access to justice for some individuals. Advocacy groups might face challenges in advising communities on engaging with agency actions effectively due to these uncertainties.

In conclusion, while H. R. 9014 sets out to clarify legal processes regarding agency actions, it does present significant challenges that need addressing to ensure it benefits all stakeholders as intended. Clearer language and definitions within the bill could mitigate these concerns, promoting fairer and more accessible legal remedies.