Overview

Title

To direct the Secretary of Education to conduct a study regarding the use of mobile devices in elementary and secondary schools, and to establish a pilot program of awarding grants to enable certain schools to create a school environment free of mobile devices.

ELI5 AI

The Focus on Learning Act is all about checking how using phones and tablets in schools affects kids' learning and feelings. It also wants to test out locking these devices away during school to see if it helps kids focus better, but some special uses, like translation or health needs, are allowed.

Summary AI

H.R. 8993, also known as the Focus on Learning Act, seeks to have the Secretary of Education study how mobile devices affect students in elementary and secondary schools. The bill also proposes a pilot program to award grants to certain schools to create environments free of mobile devices by using secure storage for the devices during school hours. The study will look at how mobile device usage impacts student learning, mental health, and classroom behavior, and report the findings to Congress. Participating schools in the pilot program can allow limited exemptions for mobile device use, such as for health reasons or for students needing translation assistance.

Published

2024-07-10
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-10
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8993ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
1,189
Pages:
6
Sentences:
31

Language

Nouns: 355
Verbs: 98
Adjectives: 102
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 35
Entities: 43

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.51
Average Sentence Length:
38.35
Token Entropy:
5.06
Readability (ARI):
22.58

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

H.R. 8993, also known as the "Focus on Learning Act," aims to address the pervasive use of mobile devices in elementary and secondary schools. The proposed legislation directs the Secretary of Education to conduct a comprehensive study on the effects of mobile devices on various aspects of student experience, including learning, mental health, and behavior. In parallel, it proposes the establishment of a pilot program. This program would provide grants to certain schools to create environments free from mobile devices. These schools would secure students' mobile devices during school hours, except in specific situations that require mobile access, such as for health monitoring or for students with disabilities.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the primary concerns raised in the bill is its broad definition of "mobile device," which could unintentionally include a wide array of electronic devices beyond personal mobile phones. This presents challenges in terms of enforcement and practicality for schools.

The process for selecting schools to participate in the pilot program is largely left to the discretion of the Secretary of Education. This raises concerns about transparency and the possibility of bias in the selection process. Additionally, while the bill allocates $5 million for the pilot program, it does not specify how this funding will be distributed over the fiscal years 2024 to 2028. This lack of clarity could lead to inadequate budgeting and financial management.

Moreover, there is no specified budget for the study on mobile device use, which could lead to inefficiencies and unnecessary expenditures. The bill also allows up to 2% of the total funds for administrative expenses—this percentage could potentially divert significant resources away from the program’s primary objectives if not properly managed.

Another issue is the lack of specific guidelines for managing the secure containers meant to hold students' mobile devices. This raises concerns about security and the privacy of these devices while in school custody. Additionally, although the bill requires parental notification and feedback on the device-free environment, it lacks clarity on how this feedback will influence the decision-making process.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill strives to create a learning environment less distracted by mobile devices, potentially enhancing focus and academic success among students. By studying the effects of mobile devices and implementing the pilot program, lawmakers aim to gather data that could shape future educational policies. However, without careful planning and oversight, schools might face challenges in implementing these policies efficiently and equitably.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For students, especially those who rely on mobile devices for health reasons or language assistance, any missteps in managing exemptions could negatively affect their learning experience and safety. Teachers and administrators might benefit from clearer guidelines and increased control over classroom environments, which could lead to improved teaching dynamics.

Parents are essential stakeholders, and the bill acknowledges their importance by requiring their notification and input. However, the effectiveness of their involvement could be compromised if their feedback is not adequately integrated into policy decisions.

Lastly, educational agencies are tasked with implementing the pilot program, and insufficient guidance or resources could result in varied execution and potential inequities between participating schools. The intent of the bill is positive, yet careful consideration is necessary to ensure that the benefits of reduced mobile device distractions do not come at the cost of essential accessibility and transparency.

Financial Assessment

The bill, titled the Focus on Learning Act, introduces several financial aspects related to the establishment of a pilot program intended to create school environments free of mobile devices. Here's a breakdown of the financial references and how they tie into the raised issues:

Appropriation and Spending Overview

The primary financial element of the bill is the authorization of funds to support its initiatives. Specifically, the bill sets aside $5,000,000 for the pilot program for the fiscal years 2024 through 2028. This amount is intended to enable participating schools to purchase secure containers and install lockers, creating environments where student mobile devices can be stored during school hours.

Issues with Financial Transparency and Planning

The bill, however, does not specify how the $5,000,000 is to be distributed across the specified period. This lack of detailed financial planning is a concern because it can impact both transparency and the ability of schools to plan budgets effectively. Understanding how funds will be allocated each year is crucial for schools to manage resources efficiently, avoid shortfalls, and make the necessary investments for the program's success.

Administrative Expenses

The bill allows up to 2% of the allocated funds to be used for administrative expenses, data collection, and conducting a study on mobile device use in schools. While administrative costs are necessary, there is an issue raised concerning potentially excessive use of funds for administrative purposes. If not closely monitored, this allocation could overshadow the program's direct objectives, such as the installation of secure storage solutions in schools.

Absence of Budget for the Study

Notably, the bill mandates a study on the impact of mobile device use in schools, yet it does not specify a separate budget or estimated cost for conducting this research. This omission could lead to inefficiencies or wasteful spending, as there is no clear financial guideline or constraint related to this part of the initiative. Moreover, without a defined budget, it’s challenging to assess whether the allocated resources are adequate or excessive.

In conclusion, while the Focus on Learning Act sets a clear financial groundwork for its objectives, the absence of detailed budgetary allocations and transparent financial planning raises concerns. These areas require careful attention to ensure that the program remains both fiscally responsible and effective in achieving its intended outcomes.

Issues

  • The broad definition of 'MOBILE DEVICE' in Section 2 could potentially include a wide range of electronics beyond personal mobile devices, raising concerns about overreach and enforcement challenges for schools.

  • The process for selecting participating schools in the pilot program as outlined in Section 4 is determined solely by the Secretary of Education, which lacks transparency and may lead to potential bias or lack of diverse stakeholder input.

  • Section 4 outlines the allocation of $5,000,000 for the pilot program but does not specify the distribution of funds across the fiscal years 2024 through 2028, which could affect transparency and budget planning.

  • Section 3 doesn't specify a budget or estimated cost for conducting the study on mobile device use, which could result in potential wasteful spending and inefficiencies.

  • The definition of 'SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT FREE OF MOBILE DEVICES' in Section 2 does not provide specific guidelines on managing secure containers, raising concerns about security and privacy of students' devices.

  • In Section 4, the provision allowing up to 2% of total funds for administrative expenses may become excessive if not properly monitored, potentially overshadowing the program's direct objectives.

  • The lack of detailed criteria for qualifying communication systems for participating schools in Section 4 could lead to inconsistent implementations and potential safety issues.

  • The parental notification and feedback process described in Section 4 lacks detail on how parental feedback will influence program implementation, possibly leading to stakeholder disengagement.

  • Section 2 relies on external documentation for definitions of 'ESEA TERMS' without providing them within the bill, potentially leading to confusion for those unfamiliar with the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that it can be called the “Focus on Learning Act.”

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section defines key terms used in the Act. It outlines what is meant by "mobile device," "school environment free of mobile devices," "school hours," and references the definitions of several educational terms from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965.

3. Study Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that within two years of the law being passed, the Secretary of Education, along with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, must conduct a study on how using mobile devices in elementary and secondary schools affects student learning, health, and behavior. A report with the study's findings should be submitted to Congress and made available to the public.

4. Pilot program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary of Education will start a pilot program to award grants for schools to create mobile device-free environments by purchasing secure containers and lockers. Participating schools must involve their community in planning, notify parents, and can allow limited mobile device use for health monitoring, students with disabilities, or language translation.

Money References

  • (e) Parental notification.—Each local educational agency that applies for participation in the pilot program under this section shall— (1) notify parents of students enrolled in elementary schools and secondary schools that are served by the agency and that may become participating schools— (A) not less than 30 days before submitting an application under this section; and (B) upon receipt of a grant award under this section; and (2) solicit feedback from such parents before applying for the grant about the local educational agency's desire to implement a school environment free of mobile devices. (f) Administrative expenses.—The Secretary of Education may use not more than 2 percent of the amounts made available to carry out this section for administrative expenses, data collection, and carrying out the study required under section 3. (g) Authorization of appropriations.—There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section, $5,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2024 through 2028.