Overview

Title

To require covered platforms to remove nonconsensual intimate visual depictions, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "TAKE IT DOWN Act" is a rule that says websites have to take down private pictures and videos if someone shares them without asking the person in the picture first. It aims to protect people, especially kids, from having their pictures shown online without permission.

Summary AI

H.R. 8989, known as the "TAKE IT DOWN Act," mandates that online platforms remove intimate images or videos shared without consent if they identify the person depicted. The bill updates the Communications Act to prohibit using online services to publish such content without consent, especially targeting deepfakes and images of individuals under 18. It requires platforms to have a process for removing these images upon request and outlines penalties for violations, including fines and imprisonment. The Federal Trade Commission is given the power to enforce these rules as unfair or deceptive practices.

Published

2024-07-10
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-10
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8989ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
4
Words:
2,708
Pages:
15
Sentences:
54

Language

Nouns: 638
Verbs: 191
Adjectives: 242
Adverbs: 28
Numbers: 90
Entities: 90

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.21
Average Sentence Length:
50.15
Token Entropy:
5.16
Readability (ARI):
26.72

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, known as the "Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act" or "TAKE IT DOWN Act," seeks to address an ongoing concern with the unauthorized sharing of intimate visual images online. This bill specifically targets "covered platforms," which are broadly defined as websites or applications primarily serving user-generated content, and mandates the removal of nonconsensual intimate images. The act aims to criminalize the intentional disclosure of such visual depictions, enforce penalties for violations, and establish procedures for the timely removal of this content when reported. Moreover, the Federal Trade Commission is given the task of enforcing these rules.

Summary of Significant Issues

One critical issue revolves around the definition of "covered platforms," which could lead to ambiguity. The lack of clarity in what constitutes a platform that "primarily provides a forum for user-generated content" might allow platforms to make minor adjustments to evade regulation. Another concern is the absence of a clear process for verifying the identity of individuals requesting content removal, leaving room for potential misuse through false requests. Additionally, the bill's timeline for removing content—within 48 hours—might be challenging for smaller platforms, particularly those with limited resources.

The complex language and extensive cross-referencing to other legislative documents could hinder comprehension and enforcement, necessitating additional legal resources to interpret. The undefined criteria for penalties could lead to inconsistent interpretations and applications. Similarly, the act omits discussions on costs and resources required for enforcement, which calls into question the financial feasibility of implementing the bill’s provisions, especially for federal authorities such as the FTC.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, this bill aims to protect individuals from harassment and exploitation through unauthorized sharing of intimate images, offering a legal recourse to mitigate potential harms. For the general public, this bill could provide a sense of safety and control over personal content shared online, addressing concerns around privacy invasions and digital consent. Highlighting these protections is crucial in the digital age, where online safety is a growing concern.

Specific stakeholders, such as victims of nonconsensual intimate image sharing, could benefit significantly from the TAKE IT DOWN Act, gaining tools to expedite the removal of harmful content and legal support against perpetrators. However, for online platforms, especially smaller ones, the demands of swift content review and removal could lead to operational strains, increased costs, and potential legal challenges due to the ambiguous definitions and liability provisions.

On a broader scale, internet platforms will likely need to reassess and potentially enhance existing content moderation practices to meet the bill’s requirements. This could further influence the digital service landscape through heightened emphasis on user data protection and inline safety filters. While these changes might bolster public confidence in digital platforms, they may simultaneously result in increased operational costs or stricter content regulations, impacting user experience and platform accessibility.

Conclusion

The TAKE IT DOWN Act addresses a critical aspect of digital privacy by targeting the unauthorized sharing of intimate visual content. Notwithstanding its potential positive implications for personal privacy and victim protection, the bill's ambiguous aspects and logistical challenges may lead to practical hurdles in its enforcement and application. The impact on various digital platforms and their users will hinge upon careful implementation and potential revisions to address these identified issues, ensuring that intended benefits are fully realized.

Issues

  • The bill's definition of 'covered platform' in Section 4 potentially leaves ambiguity about the scope of regulated entities by not clearly defining what constitutes 'primarily provides a forum for user-generated content', which could allow some platforms to evade regulation through minor adjustments in content curation.

  • In Section 3, the lack of criteria for verifying the identity of individuals requesting content removal could lead to misuse of the process through false requests, posing potential ethical and legal challenges.

  • The timeline for content removal given in Section 3 (48 hours) might be unrealistic for smaller platforms with limited resources, potentially resulting in noncompliance with the bill.

  • Section 2's complex language and cross-referencing to other acts create barriers to understanding and may hinder legal clarity and enforcement.

  • The lack of detailed criteria for determining penalties in Section 2 could lead to inconsistent enforcement and interpretation by legal entities.

  • The absence of budgetary considerations or a cost analysis for implementing the bill's provisions in Section 2, such as handling forfeitures and distributing restitution, raises concerns about the financial feasibility of the bill's enforcement.

  • Section 3 does not provide protections for individuals if the removal process fails, risking prolonged exposure of nonconsensual content, which poses ethical issues.

  • The provision for limitation on liability in Section 3 could lead to vagueness in what constitutes a 'good faith' effort by platforms, resulting in potential legal uncertainty and disputes.

  • The enforcement mechanism under Section 3 grants broad jurisdiction to the Federal Trade Commission without specifying the resources or strategies to be used, which may impact the practical enforceability of the bill.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text refers to the short title of a legislative bill. This Act can be called the "Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act" or simply the "TAKE IT DOWN Act."

2. Criminal prohibition on intentional disclosure of nonconsensual intimate visual depictions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text amends the Communications Act of 1934, creating a criminal offense for intentionally sharing intimate images of someone without their consent, unless certain exceptions apply, and outlines penalties like fines and imprisonment. It includes special rules for images involving minors and specifies conditions under which sharing is permissible, adds penalties for issuing threats related to such sharing, and addresses forfeiture and restitution requirements upon conviction.

3. Notice and removal of nonconsensual intimate visual depictions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a mandate for online platforms to create a process allowing individuals to report and request the removal of intimate images posted without their consent. These platforms must act on these requests within 48 hours, while the Federal Trade Commission is responsible for enforcing these rules as a violation of fair practices under existing law.

4. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section of the Act, key terms are explained: "Commission" refers to the Federal Trade Commission, while terms like "consent," "deepfake," and "identifiable individual" are defined by another law. A "covered platform" is any online platform mainly for user content but does not include broadband providers, email services, or sites with mostly preselected content and limited user interaction.