Overview
Title
To amend title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure cost sharing for a drug does not exceed the nationwide average of consumer purchase prices for such drug.
ELI5 AI
The "Lowest Price for Patients Act of 2024" is a bill that wants to make sure people don't have to pay more for medicine than what other people in the country usually pay. This will help people save money when buying their medicine, and it will be the same rule for everyone.
Summary AI
H.R. 8987, also known as the "Lowest Price for Patients Act of 2024," proposes changes to existing health laws to ensure that the cost-sharing amount a person has to pay for a drug doesn't exceed the average price people pay nationwide for that drug. The bill applies to both group health plans and individual health insurance coverage, requiring them to adjust their cost-sharing practices accordingly. It also mandates that any pharmacy benefit managers, who help with prescription drug plans, follow these rules. This legislation involves adjustments to the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and the Internal Revenue Code to implement these changes.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The "Lowest Price for Patients Act of 2024," introduced in the House of Representatives as H.R. 8987, aims to provide financial relief on prescription drugs by limiting the cost-sharing burdens that consumers face. Under this bill, for plan years beginning after its enactment, group health plans and insurance issuers would be prohibited from charging more for covered outpatient drugs at in-network pharmacies than the national average of consumer purchase prices for those drugs over the preceding year. Pharmacy benefit managers, who play a crucial role in the administration of prescription drug programs, are also required to comply with these cost-sharing limitations.
General Summary of the Bill
This legislation proposes amendments to several existing acts, including the Public Health Service Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. By introducing caps on cost-sharing measures—such as deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments—for prescription drugs, the bill seeks to ensure that consumers do not pay more than the average price for such medications nationwide. This approach is meant to offer patients across the country more predictable and manageable drug prices.
Summary of Significant Issues
A significant concern with the bill is its vagueness regarding the calculation of the "nationwide average of consumer purchase prices." This key term lacks a straightforward definition, which could lead to inconsistencies in its application and challenges in implementation. The dependence on a specific survey from the Social Security Act to determine these prices might create vulnerabilities, such as potential changes in survey methodology or data collection practices. This could affect the reliability of the cost-sharing limits set forth in the bill. Additionally, the bill does not outline specific enforcement mechanisms or penalties for non-compliance, raising questions about how these provisions will be monitored and upheld.
Impact on the Public Broadly
If effectively implemented, this bill could positively influence the broader public by providing a financial buffer against unpredictable and often high drug prices. By tethering cost-sharing measures to the national average, it reduces the variability and potential excessiveness in costs that patients might otherwise face. This standardization could bring much-needed relief to individuals and families grappling with healthcare expenses.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For consumers, especially those who require expensive ongoing medications, this bill could mean significant savings and financial predictability. By capping cost-sharing at the national average, they may avoid unexpected high costs at the pharmacy counter. However, stakeholders such as health insurance issuers and pharmacy benefit managers might see an impact on their financial structures and contractual arrangements, as the bill imposes restrictions on how costs are shared and managed. These entities may need to adjust their financial models and operations to adhere to the new requirements.
Conversely, the lack of detailed compliance measures and clarity on calculation methods could place an operational burden on these entities, leading to administrative challenges and potential legal disputes. Clarifying these aspects would be crucial to ensure smooth implementation and operation under the new rules.
In summary, while the "Lowest Price for Patients Act of 2024" presents an appealing proposition for reducing drug costs for consumers, its success hinges on clarifying key definitions and establishing robust enforcement protocols to ensure all stakeholders adhere to the intended cost limitations effectively.
Issues
The definition of the 'nationwide average of consumer purchase prices' and its calculation method is vague throughout Sections 2730, 726, and 9826. This lack of clarity could lead to inconsistencies in how cost-sharing limits are applied across different health plans and issuers.
There is no clear mechanism outlined for updating the 'nationwide average of consumer purchase prices' data annually in Sections 2730, 726, and 9826, which could result in outdated pricing benchmarks affecting cost-sharing obligations reality.
Enforcement mechanisms and penalties for non-compliance by pharmacy benefit managers, plans, and issuers are not described in Sections 2730, 726, and 9826, making it unclear how the limitations on cost sharing will be enforced or what the repercussions for non-compliance will be.
The dependence on the survey described in section 1927(f)(1)(A)(i) of the Social Security Act, referred to in Sections 2730, 726, and 9826 as a source for pricing data, may lead to inconsistencies if there are changes in survey methodology or data collection, potentially affecting the stability and reliability of cost-sharing calculations.
There could be potential ambiguity in compliance requirements for pharmacy benefit managers as stated in Sections 2730, 726, and 9826, given the lack of clarity on monitoring and enforcement, causing challenges in holding them accountable.
The term 'in-network pharmacy' is defined in Sections 2730, 726, and 9826, but the criteria for establishing a 'contractual relationship' might vary across different plans, potentially leading to disparities in how the term is interpreted and applied.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section gives the official name of the law, stating that it can be referred to as the "Lowest Price for Patients Act of 2024".
2. Ensuring cost sharing for a drug does not exceed the nationwide average of consumer purchase prices for such drug Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For plan years starting after the enactment of this section, group health plans and health insurance issuers cannot charge more for cost-sharing (like co-pays and deductibles) on covered outpatient drugs dispensed by an in-network pharmacy than the average consumer price across the country for that drug. This rule also applies to pharmacy benefit managers who must follow the same cost-sharing limits. A "covered outpatient drug" and "in-network pharmacy" are specifically defined under the Social Security Act.
2730. Limitation on cost sharing for drugs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For health insurance plans starting after this section becomes law, any group health plan or insurer can't charge more for cost sharing on covered outpatient drugs bought at in-network pharmacies than the average national price from the past year. Also, pharmacy benefit managers must follow the same rules as the plans or insurers regarding these cost-sharing limits.
726. Limitation on cost sharing for drugs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For plan years starting after this section is enacted, health plans and insurers can't charge more for covered outpatient drugs at in-network pharmacies than the nationwide average price consumers paid for the drug over the past year. Additionally, pharmacy benefit managers must also follow this rule.
9826. Limitation on cost sharing for drugs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For plan years starting after this section is enacted, a group health plan cannot make people pay more for a covered outpatient drug at an in-network pharmacy than the average price paid by consumers nationwide, using specific data for the past year. This rule also applies to pharmacy benefit managers working under the plan.