Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Education to award grants to State educational agencies for the purpose of implementing, administering, and evaluating programs that provide tutoring to students in elementary and secondary schools, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 896 helps kids learn better by giving money to schools for special tutoring programs, so if a student needs extra help with their schoolwork, there will be more tutors to support them.
Summary AI
H.R. 896, known as the “Expanding Access to High-Impact Tutoring Act of 2025,” aims to improve student learning outcomes by providing grants to state educational agencies, which will then distribute subgrants to local educational agencies for launching and managing tutoring programs in elementary and secondary schools. The bill outlines how funds should be used, prioritizes local agencies with higher needs, and establishes an Advisory Board to oversee program standards and ensure tutoring efforts have a positive impact on academic achievement. Additionally, the bill encourages the creation of a national tutoring workforce and ensures that implementing these programs doesn't interfere with existing employee rights and agreements.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Expanding Access to High-Impact Tutoring Act of 2025," aims to enhance educational outcomes by establishing a comprehensive tutoring grant program targeting elementary and secondary schools in the United States. This bill would authorize the Secretary of Education to distribute grants to state educational agencies. These agencies would then allocate the funds to local school districts to implement high-quality tutoring programs. The goal of the tutoring initiative is to assist students in improving their academic performance with a focus on subjects like math and reading. The bill foresees program monitoring and evaluation as essential components and proposes to build a nationwide tutoring workforce.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the noteworthy issues with the bill is its vagueness around the funding allocation, particularly evident in the phrase "such sums as may be necessary," which lacks a specific financial cap. This could lead to concerns about overspending and accountability. Additionally, the criteria for grant approvals are not clearly defined, raising potential issues of bias. The involvement of external parties, like the Advisory Board, adds another layer of complexity, which could delay implementation.
Furthermore, prioritizing certain educational agencies for subgrants might be challenging due to references to other complex legislation. This complexity in understanding potential benefits could obstruct effective participation from under-resourced agencies. The stringent requirement for the student-to-tutor ratio and regular program evaluations impose additional logistical hurdles that might be difficult for smaller agencies to navigate.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill holds the promise of enhancing the quality of education through targeted tutoring interventions, potentially leading to improved student performance. By focusing on high-impact tutoring, the initiative could support student recovery, particularly in the wake of COVID-19 disruptions that left many students lagging in core competencies like math and reading. However, the success of this bill in making a tangible impact across the U.S. could be stymied by the lack of clarity in funding and operational guidelines.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Educational Agencies: State and local educational agencies could benefit from increased funding to support students. However, the lack of clear guidance and the bureaucratic demands may pose a challenge, particularly for agencies with fewer resources and administrative capabilities.
Students and Teachers: Students stand to gain from additional academic support, which could close learning gaps exacerbated by recent challenges such as the pandemic. Teachers may face additional duties, but these could be mitigated by partnering with well-supported volunteer and workforce programs. Yet, the stringent tutor-to-student ratio could put pressure on staffing, potentially affecting teacher workload and morale.
Nonprofit and Research Organizations: These entities could see increased collaboration opportunities under this bill, potentially benefiting from funds and partnerships to assist in evaluating and refining educational programs. However, they would need to contend with the approval processes that could delay implementation.
In conclusion, the "Expanding Access to High-Impact Tutoring Act of 2025" is a significant step toward addressing educational challenges in the U.S. While promising in theory, the execution would need careful consideration and clarity in its operational framework to ensure that the intended impacts are realized effectively and efficiently.
Issues
The term 'such sums as may be necessary' in Section 2(a) is vague, potentially leading to overspending or lack of financial accountability due to the absence of a clear budget or cap on allocated funds.
Section 3(b) lacks clearly defined criteria and transparency for the approval of grant applications by the Secretary and the Advisory Board, which might lead to potential biases or unfair award processes.
In Section 4(b), the priority criteria for awarding subgrants could impose challenges for local educational agencies due to references to multiple external acts and sections, which might complicate understanding and compliance.
Section 4(d)(3)(C)(i)(I)(BB) implies financial withdrawal from ineffective programs, which could suddenly disrupt educational support and adversely affect student outcomes if not promptly and effectively managed.
The establishment of the Advisory Board in Section 5 without defined financial parameters may lead to potential wasteful spending if not properly monitored and controlled.
The complex and lengthy language used to describe the duties of the Advisory Board in Section 5(d) may hinder understanding and implementation, potentially reducing the Board's effectiveness.
In Section 6(b)(1)(B), the requirement for a stringent student-to-tutor ratio of no more than 3-to-1 might impose significant logistical and financial challenges, especially for local educational agencies with limited resources.
The coordination with government entities such as AmeriCorps in Section 7 is vaguely defined and lacks specific details on involvement and compensation, which could result in inefficiencies and misallocation of resources.
The phrase 'through bargaining, or where bargaining does not exist, through collaboration with the State or local educator union' in Section 8 might create ambiguity regarding processes in areas with limited union representation or authority.
Section 9 references terms defined in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, requiring readers to cross-reference another document, which can be cumbersome and limit accessibility.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill provides its official short title, which is the "Expanding Access to High-Impact Tutoring Act of 2025."
2. Authorization and distribution of funds Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the bill authorizes the allocation of necessary funds for the years 2026 to 2030 and details how these funds should be distributed: 80% for grants to state educational agencies, 10% for developing a nationwide tutoring workforce, 5% for evaluation activities by state agencies, and 5% for tasks assigned to the Advisory Board.
3. High-impact tutoring grant program established Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The High-impact Tutoring Grant Program is created to help improve students' learning based on each state's academic standards. Each state can apply for grants by submitting required plans, and the grant amounts will be distributed based on the funds they received in the previous year under a specific federal education program.
4. Subgrants to local educational agencies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes how state educational agencies can give out grants to local educational agencies for tutoring programs in schools. It explains the criteria for awarding these grants, such as prioritizing areas with high need, and sets rules for how the money should be used, reported on, and possibly renewed, making sure these funds are in addition to other education funds and encouraging collaboration with various stakeholders.
5. Advisory board Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes an Advisory Board within the Department of Education to evaluate, assist, and provide guidance on tutoring programs at the elementary and secondary levels. It outlines the board's responsibilities, such as approving plans, providing technical assistance, reviewing requests, coordinating training, and developing a tutoring workforce, all aimed at improving student academic outcomes through effective tutoring strategies.
6. Subgrant uses Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Local educational agencies receiving subgrants are required to use the funds to set up tutoring programs in math and reading that are aligned with classroom work, conducted by trained and observed professionals or volunteers, and operated consistently throughout the school year. These programs may include technology and virtual components, must be regularly evaluated for their impact on student achievement, and should provide monthly updates on the tutoring hours, days, and student participation to both the Advisory Board and State educational agency.
7. Nationwide tutoring workforce Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines how the Advisory Board, working with various educational and service organizations, will establish a nationwide tutoring workforce. This involves identifying staffing needs, providing funding and training for tutors, including teachers and volunteers, and creating programs to recruit local community members and students to work as tutors in schools facing staff shortages.
8. Bargaining Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If a tutoring program under this Act affects the work conditions of school employees, it must be negotiated with the relevant employee unions before starting. Additionally, if this Act's requirements conflict with existing employee rights under other laws or agreements, the latter will take precedence and won't cause funding issues.
9. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines important terms for the Act. It specifies that several key terms have the same meanings as in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. It also explains that a "program administrator" is someone responsible for ensuring a tutoring program complies with the Act and for managing tutor training and observations.