Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude overtime compensation from gross income for purposes of the income tax.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 8938 is about changing the rules so that when people work extra hours and earn more money, the extra money they make won't be counted when figuring out how much tax they need to pay. So, if someone works a lot of overtime, they might end up paying less in taxes.

Summary AI

H.R. 8938, known as the “Keep Every Extra Penny Act of 2024,” proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The bill aims to exclude overtime pay from being considered as part of an individual's gross income for income tax purposes. This means that when calculating taxes, the money earned from working overtime would not be counted, potentially leading to lower tax bills for workers who earn overtime pay. The changes would apply to all overtime compensation earned after the act is enacted.

Published

2024-07-08
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-08
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8938ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
285
Pages:
2
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 96
Verbs: 20
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 18
Entities: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
21.92
Token Entropy:
4.47
Readability (ARI):
12.73

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Bill 8938, titled the “Keep Every Extra Penny Act of 2024,” proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. This legislation seeks to exclude overtime compensation from what is considered gross income for income tax purposes. Introduced by Mr. Fulcher and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, the bill aims to reduce the taxable income base by allowing individuals to retain the full amount of their overtime earnings, rather than having it taxed as part of their general income.

Summary of Significant Issues

This bill presents several important considerations and potential challenges:

  1. Fiscal Impact: The exclusion of overtime pay from taxable income could significantly reduce government tax revenue. Without a corresponding approach to balance this reduction, such as spending cuts or an increase in other types of revenue, there could be a noticeable fiscal imbalance.

  2. Implementation and Administration: The effective date for this change is aligned with the bill's enactment, which may pose administrative hurdles. Employers will need to adjust their payroll systems, and employees might face challenges in understanding new tax filing protocols.

  3. Clarity and Accessibility: The bill references Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 without providing context, potentially confusing those unfamiliar with the legislation. Clarity about which types of overtime compensation this applies to would be beneficial.

  4. Impact on Various Sectors: Different industries have varying practices and levels of reliance on overtime work. The lack of a sectoral impact analysis raises questions about equity and fairness in how different groups might be affected.

  5. Potential for Ambiguities and Misuse: The bill does not inherently include limits or conditions for excluding overtime compensation, leaving room for potential misinterpretations that could affect both taxpayers and government revenue streams.

Broad Impact on the Public

For the general public, particularly hourly wage earners who rely heavily on overtime to supplement their income, this bill could offer a financial reprieve. Individuals may see an increase in their take-home pay as their overtime earnings would not be diminished by federal income tax. This could improve the financial wellbeing of many workers, potentially increasing disposable income and stimulating consumption.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Workers and Families: Those who primarily work hourly jobs and earn overtime will likely benefit the most, as they would keep more of their earnings. This could lead to enhanced lifestyles and potentially increased savings or investments in personal development.

Employers and HR Departments: Employers may face initial administrative challenges in adapting to new payroll requirements, needing to invest in system updates and training staff. However, in the long term, the change may be perceived as employee-friendly, possibly improving workplace morale and retention.

Government and Public Services: On the downside, a decrease in taxable income may lead to reduced federal revenue, impacting public services and programs funded by income taxes. Policymakers might need to explore alternative funding strategies to maintain service levels.

In conclusion, while the “Keep Every Extra Penny Act of 2024” aims to offer financial benefits to workers, it also presents challenges that need careful consideration and planning, particularly regarding its broader economic implications and the diversity of impacts across different employment sectors.

Issues

  • The exclusion of overtime compensation from gross income, as outlined in Section 2 and Section 139J, could lead to significant reductions in tax revenue. This may result in fiscal imbalance if not offset by spending cuts or increased revenue from other sources.

  • The amendment in Section 2 intends to exclude overtime compensation from gross income without providing a fiscal impact analysis, leaving the overall effect on government revenue unclear.

  • The effective date of the amendment, tied to its enactment, as mentioned in Section 2, could create administrative challenges for both employers and employees, particularly concerning payroll systems and tax filing obligations.

  • Section 139J's lack of specification or limits on the exclusion of overtime compensation may lead to ambiguities or misuse, potentially impacting both taxpayers and government revenue.

  • The bill, mainly in Section 139J, refers to section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 without context, requiring readers to seek additional information to fully understand the provision.

  • There is no mention in Section 2 and Section 139J of how the exclusion impacts different sectors or industries, raising equity and fairness concerns as it might affect them unevenly.

  • The use of the term 'gross income' in Section 139J without a clear definition could lead to confusion about its scope and application, impacting both taxpayers and the administrative process.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this bill establishes its short title, which is the “Keep Every Extra Penny Act of 2024”.

2. Exclusion of overtime compensation from gross income Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section proposes that overtime pay should not be counted as part of a person's taxable income according to the Internal Revenue Code, and it will take effect for overtime compensation received after the law is enacted.

139J. Overtime compensation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Gross income does not count overtime pay that is required by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.