Overview

Title

To require the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to issue a final rule requiring any card issuer that issues a pre-approved credit card to a senior citizen to provide fraud alerts to certain individuals, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The "Janie Wynn Protecting Elders from Financial Exploitation Act" is a rule that wants credit card companies to help protect older people from being tricked or losing their money by sending alerts when something strange happens with their credit card or bank account. It also wants bank workers to learn how to spot when someone might be trying to take advantage of a senior's money.

Summary AI

H.R. 8922, titled the "Janie Wynn Protecting Elders from Financial Exploitation Act," seeks to protect senior citizens from financial fraud related to pre-approved credit cards. It mandates the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to create a rule that requires card issuers to provide fraud alerts to senior citizens and a designated individual, unless waived. The bill also requires banks and credit unions to train their employees to recognize signs of financial exploitation, alert senior citizen account holders to unusual account activities, and notify them within 24 hours of any suspicious transactions.

Published

2024-07-02
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-02
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8922ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,124
Pages:
6
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 364
Verbs: 78
Adjectives: 78
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 33
Entities: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.15
Average Sentence Length:
112.40
Token Entropy:
4.99
Readability (ARI):
57.80

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

H.R. 8922, titled the "Janie Wynn Protecting Elders from Financial Exploitation Act," aims to safeguard senior citizens against financial exploitation through enhanced monitoring and alert systems by financial institutions. Introduced by Mr. Higgins of Louisiana, the bill mandates the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection to enforce new regulations. These regulations require credit card issuers to send fraud alerts to senior cardholders and a trusted individual they select. Additionally, banks and credit unions must train employees to recognize questionable account activities that could indicate exploitation and notify seniors within 24 hours of detecting such activities.

Significant Issues

One of the key concerns with the bill is the operational burden it places on financial institutions. The requirement to notify seniors of irregular activities within 24 hours may incur significant costs, especially for smaller banks and credit unions. The bill does not clearly define what constitutes ‘irregular activity,’ potentially complicating compliance efforts. Moreover, the timeframe of 180 days for the issuance of a final rule may be insufficient for proper interagency coordination and public feedback.

The bill allows cardholders to waive fraud alert notifications by acknowledging increased risk, a provision that might expose seniors to exploitation without adequate safeguards. Furthermore, the bill uses complex legal terminology referencing other laws, making it difficult for those unfamiliar with these laws to fully understand its implications without additional context.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the general public, particularly senior citizens, the bill strives to enhance protections against financial fraud and exploitation. By ensuring that unusual activities on financial accounts are quickly detected and addressed, seniors may enjoy improved financial security.

However, this legislation could impose notable challenges on financial institutions, especially smaller ones. The requirement for constant vigilance and rapid communication of fraud alerts necessitates significant investment in staff training and technological systems upgrades. While this may improve fraud prevention capabilities, the associated costs could be passed on to consumers in the form of higher fees or service charges.

Credit card issuers may face a burden complying with the fraud alert requirements, which demand detailed and possibly immediate responses to suspicions of fraudulent activity. The need to provide 24/7 support as part of these alerts could increase operational costs substantially.

Overall, while H.R. 8922 may strengthen consumer protections for seniors, it raises critical considerations about feasibility and costs for the financial institutions tasked with implementing its provisions. Balancing the effectiveness of senior financial protection with the operational realities faced by banks and credit card companies will be crucial for the bill's successful implementation.

Financial Assessment

The bill titled "Janie Wynn Protecting Elders from Financial Exploitation Act" has important implications for financial institutions, specifically in terms of how they handle fraud prevention and monitoring, especially for senior citizens. Although it does not directly allocate federal funds or specify financial appropriations, the bill entails requirements that could lead to increased costs for card issuers, banks, and credit unions.

Financial Implications for Financial Institutions

One of the primary financial references in the bill is the requirement for financial institutions—including banks and credit unions—to train their employees to better identify signs of financial exploitation. This training mandate, as outlined in Section 2(a)(2), could incur additional costs for these institutions, as they may need to either develop internal training programs or engage third-party services to meet this requirement.

In addition to training expenses, the bill also stipulates that these institutions must notify account holders within 24 hours of any unusual or suspicious account activities. Implementing such real-time monitoring and notification processes might pose a significant financial burden, especially for smaller institutions that do not currently possess advanced technological infrastructures. These institutions could face substantial compliance costs to upgrade systems capable of this level of monitoring and real-time alerts.

The bill's expansive list of triggers for unusual activities—ranging from irregular credit card charges to changes in account activity—complicates compliance further. Preparing for and responding to such a broad array of potential alerts can necessitate substantial investment in both technological upgrades and operational processes. The provision to monitor for a "gap in check numbers," as mentioned in Section 2(a)(2)(L), illustrates the complexities involved, as it may require sophisticated algorithmic checks that smaller financial institutions might struggle to implement without significant investment.

Operational Burdens on Card Issuers

For card issuers, the requirement to provide fraud alerts for pre-approved credit cards to senior citizens involves implementing systems that can send real-time alerts via phone calls, emails, or text messages. This duty, although pivotal in protecting senior citizens, presents an operational challenge, as it demands around-the-clock availability. Issuers must be capable of addressing suspected fraudulent activity at any time, thus necessitating robust customer support and monitoring systems.

The bill includes a waiver provision in which cardholders can choose not to receive fraud alerts, creating a potential vulnerability if seniors unknowingly accept increased risk. The operational processes to manage and document these waivers might also entail additional costs for card issuers, particularly in retaining these records for the stipulated period.

Conclusion

While the "Janie Wynn Protecting Elders from Financial Exploitation Act" does not directly involve spending or financial disbursement from the federal budget, it imposes operational and financial responsibilities on financial institutions. These requirements, aimed at safeguarding senior citizens from financial exploitation, demand enhanced monitoring, training, and alert systems. Such mandates could result in increased operational costs, particularly for smaller institutions that may lack the necessary resources or infrastructure to comply seamlessly with the bill's extensive fraud alert and monitoring requirements.

Issues

  • The requirement for notifying any senior citizen of irregular account activity within 24 hours may impose substantial compliance costs on institutions. This could be particularly challenging for smaller banks or credit unions without clearly defined thresholds for what constitutes 'irregular activity'. [Section 2(a)(2)]

  • The provision that demands a final rule issuance within 180 days might be overly aggressive, potentially hindering comprehensive interagency coordination and adequate public feedback. [Section 2(a)]

  • The language identifying 'an individual selected by the cardholder who is at least 25 years old' for fraud alerts is vague. Additional guidance on how to effectively verify these individuals could be beneficial. [Section 2(a)(1)(B)]

  • The waiver provision allowing cardholders to waive fraud alert notifications by acknowledging increased risk could leave seniors vulnerable without clear conditions or protections. [Section 2(b)]

  • The extensive list of account monitoring triggers, such as detecting a 'gap in check numbers', may be difficult for financial institutions to implement both technologically and practically. It could require substantial investment in new systems or processes. [Section 2(a)(2)(L)]

  • The definition of 'fraud alert' necessitates detailed and possibly immediate communication about fraud suspicion, creating a potential operational burden on card issuers to provide 24/7 support. [Section 2(c)(5)]

  • The bill contains legal terminology referencing other laws (such as the Truth in Lending Act and Federal Credit Union Act), making it complex for those unfamiliar with these laws to fully comprehend the bill without additional context. [Section 2(c)]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states its short title, which is the "Janie Wynn Protecting Elders from Financial Exploitation Act".

2. Prevention of senior citizen financial exploitation Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires new rules to protect senior citizens from financial exploitation. Credit card companies must send fraud alerts to seniors and a trusted person of their choosing, while banks must train employees to spot unusual account activities that could signal exploitation, such as irregular transactions or account changes, and notify the senior within 24 hours of detection.

Money References

  • (a) In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, shall issue a final rule requiring— (1) any card issuer that issues a pre-approved credit card to a senior citizen to provide fraud alerts for such credit card upon activation to— (A) the cardholder; and (B) except as provided in subsection (b), an individual selected by the cardholder who is at least 25 years old and— (i) is a relative or spouse of the cardholder; or (ii) has provided a description to the card issuer of the nature of their relationship with the cardholder; and (2) each depository institution and credit union to provide training to employees who perform fraud detection services on how to identify account activity that is indicative of financial exploitation of a senior citizen and notify any senior citizen that possesses an account with the depository institution or credit union within 24 hours of any such account activity occurring in such account, including— (A) the irregular use of— (i) an automated teller machine; (ii) a credit card; (iii) an online banking service; or (iv) a wire transfer; (B) an irregular cash withdrawal; (C) an irregular credit card charge; (D) the absence of a regularly occurring deposit; (E) account activity in a previously inactive account; (F) the addition of an authorized user to an account; (G) a change of address associated with an account; (H) an inability to cover a charged payment due to insufficient funds in an account; (I) a request for a credit limit increase; (J) a charged payment for the purchase of gift cards or prepaid debit cards worth over $100 in total; (K) an electronic payment from an account through the Automated Clearing House network to a recipient with no history of prior payment from such account; and (L) a gap in the check number of checks cashed from an account.