Overview

Title

To set aside funds for payments to Indian tribes and tribal consortia under subpart 1 of part B of title IV of the Social Security Act.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to make sure that some money is always saved to help Native American groups take care of kids, like making sure they are safe and happy. It says that 3% of a big pile of money each year needs to go to these groups, but only if there’s enough so that nobody loses out.

Summary AI

The bill H. R. 8921, titled the “Tribal Child Welfare Support Act,” proposes changes to the Social Security Act to ensure that a portion of funds are specifically set aside for payments to Indian tribes and tribal consortia for child welfare services. It mandates that the Secretary of Health and Human Services directly pay these funds to tribal organizations. The bill also stipulates that 3% of the total funds allocated annually under a certain section be reserved for these purposes, provided that the total available funds meet a specified threshold to prevent reducing any state's allotment. These changes aim to strengthen support for child welfare services within Native American communities.

Published

2024-07-02
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-02
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8921ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
585
Pages:
3
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 162
Verbs: 42
Adjectives: 42
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 31
Entities: 48

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.04
Average Sentence Length:
45.00
Token Entropy:
4.67
Readability (ARI):
23.71

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The bill titled “Tribal Child Welfare Support Act” is designed to amend the Social Security Act. The primary goal is to ensure that a portion of funds under part B of title IV of the Social Security Act is specifically allocated to Indian tribes and tribal consortia for child welfare services. The bill mandates that 3 percent of these funds be set aside for direct payments to Indian tribes or tribal consortia once certain fiscal conditions are satisfied. The legislative proposal underscores a commitment to supporting tribal organizations directly in administering child welfare services.

Summary of Significant Issues

One of the most significant issues presented by the bill is the lack of a clear assessment of need or performance for determining the 3 percent reservation of funds for Indian tribes. This could lead to perceptions of favoritism or inefficiency, as the allocation of funds is not tied to performance indicators or need assessments. Moreover, the language describing the fiscal threshold — stipulating that the funds be reserved only if the available amount meets or exceeds 103 percent of the fiscal year 2024 allocation — may be both complex and tied to potentially obsolete benchmarks, raising concerns about administrative ambiguity and compliance challenges.

Additionally, the phrase concerning the designation of entities within tribal consortia lacks specificity, possibly leading to confusion regarding which entity is responsible for receiving or managing the funds. This lack of clarity could hinder the effective administration and use of the funds intended for child welfare.

Public Impact

For the public at large, the bill reflects an effort to uplift historically marginalized communities by directing federal resources toward the needs of Indian tribes. Its successful implementation could help address longstanding disparities in child welfare services within tribal areas, potentially improving outcomes for children and families within these communities.

Impact on Stakeholders

Positive Impact on Tribal Communities:

The bill has the potential to positively impact Indian tribes and tribal consortia by ensuring a dedicated portion of federal funds is channeled directly to them. This has the potential to empower tribes to more effectively operate child welfare programs that resonate with cultural practices and community needs. Such financial commitments could enable more culturally-sensitive support systems for children and families, improving welfare and stability.

Possible Challenges and Negative Impact:

On the flip side, the designated 3 percent reserves could be viewed as disproportionate, especially if not aligned with assessed needs or performance metrics. There's a risk that other stakeholders, possibly those within state agencies or other community organizations who face tight budgets, might perceive this allocation as diverting necessary resources, which might otherwise be distributed through competitive or needs-based assessments.

The ambiguity in operational language, particularly concerning the designation of managing entities within consortia, could lead to administrative complications or inefficiencies. Without clear guidelines, tribal organizations might face challenges in accurately deploying funds intended for their welfare programs, potentially leading to bureaucratic delays or misallocation disputes.

Overall, while the bill seeks to offer dedicated support to Indian tribes, its long-term success will likely depend on the clarity of its provisions and the establishment of robust frameworks to ensure the efficient and equitable use of allocated funds.

Issues

  • The amendment requires the Secretary to reserve 3 percent of funds for payments to Indian tribes and tribal organizations without a clear assessment of need or performance. This could be perceived as unfairly favoring these groups. (Section 2)

  • The language in the amendment regarding the threshold for reserving funds is complex, which may lead to misunderstandings regarding when the funds should be allocated as part of the State's allotment. This could complicate the administration and enforcement of the policy. (Section 2)

  • The determination that 3 percent of funds should be reserved only if the amount for a fiscal year meets or exceeds 103 percent of the fiscal year 2024 allocation might be based on arbitrary or outdated data. This could lead to inefficiencies. (Section 2)

  • The phrase 'such tribal organizations of, or entity established by, the Indian tribes that are part of the consortium as the consortium shall designate' lacks specificity, potentially causing confusion about which entity is responsible for managing or receiving funds. (Section 2)

  • Section 1 provides only the short title of the Act without detailed information or language to evaluate for potential issues. However, it is clear and straightforward. (Section 1)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this Act states that it will be called the “Tribal Child Welfare Support Act.”

2. Set-aside of funds for payments to Indian tribes and tribal consortia for child welfare services Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The text outlines changes to the Social Security Act to ensure that funds are directly paid to Indian tribes and tribal consortia for child welfare services, reserving 3 percent of the funds for these payments if certain fiscal conditions are met. If the required funding level is not reached, the funds will be considered part of the state's allotment where the tribal organization is located.