Overview

Title

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude certain students from the calculation to determine if certain private colleges and universities are subject to the excise tax on net investment income, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to change how certain schools count some of their students when figuring out if they have to pay a special tax, and it also asks these schools to tell more about how they count these students.

Summary AI

The bill H.R. 8913, titled the "Protecting American Students Act," proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It aims to amend the way private colleges and universities determine if they are subject to an excise tax on their net investment income by excluding certain students from this calculation. Additionally, the bill requires these institutions to report specific information regarding the application of this excise tax, ensuring that they disclose the number of students considered both before and after applying the new exclusion criteria. These changes would take effect for taxable years starting after December 31, 2024.

Published

2024-07-02
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-07-02
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8913ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
588
Pages:
3
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 180
Verbs: 41
Adjectives: 40
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 32
Entities: 40

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.38
Average Sentence Length:
58.80
Token Entropy:
4.73
Readability (ARI):
32.14

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

This bill, titled "Protecting American Students Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It aims to modify the calculation method used to determine whether certain private colleges and universities should be taxed on their net investment income. Specifically, the bill proposes excluding some students from this calculation, particularly those who do not meet certain eligibility criteria under existing education laws. Additionally, the bill mandates that these educational institutions report specific data regarding student numbers used in tax calculations. The changes are set to take effect for tax years starting after December 31, 2024.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill presents several significant issues that may affect its clarity and implementation:

  1. Lack of Clarity on Policy Intent: The bill does not explain the rationale behind excluding certain students from the tax calculation, leaving stakeholders to speculate about the policy's intent or potential benefits.

  2. Technical Complexity: The language is heavily technical, making numerous cross-references to existing legislation. This might pose comprehension challenges for those not familiar with tax laws or educational regulations.

  3. Undefined Terms: Key terms, such as "eligible educational institution," are not clearly defined within the bill, which could lead to confusion about which colleges or universities are impacted by this legislation.

  4. Incomplete Reporting Guidance: The bill does not detail how institutions should compute the number of students for reporting purposes, leading to potential inconsistencies in reporting practices.

  5. Administrative Cost Concerns: The bill does not consider the possible administrative burdens on educational institutions, particularly smaller ones, which might face challenges complying with new reporting requirements.

  6. Lack of Enforcement Measures: There is no mention of penalties or measures for non-compliance, which may weaken the bill's effectiveness in ensuring that institutions provide accurate and timely data.

Impact on the Public Broadly

The bill's impact on the public at large may center around its effects on private educational institution taxation and funding. If certain students are excluded from calculations, it might lead to fewer institutions being subject to the excise tax on net investment income, potentially reducing tax revenues. This outcome could either enable these institutions to allocate more resources to educational purposes or diminish public funds used for broader educational support.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Private Colleges and Universities: These stakeholders might benefit from reduced tax burdens if they fall below the taxable threshold due to the student exclusions. However, the complexity and potential increase in administrative requirements could pose new challenges, especially for smaller institutions with limited resources.

Students: There is a potential indirect benefit to students, as institutions facing lower tax liabilities might redirect resources toward improving student services or lowering tuition fees. However, the bill does not explicitly address how such benefits would be realized.

Policy Makers and Tax Authorities: The absence of clearly defined terms and enforcement mechanisms could create challenges in implementing and overseeing compliance with the new rules. The need for clearer guidelines and proper communication would be paramount for effective governance.

Overall, while the bill seeks to refine how private college investments are taxed, it raises several questions about its implementation and effect, necessitating further clarification and possibly additional legislative refinement to ensure all stakeholders clearly understand and can comply with the intended law.

Issues

  • The amendment in Section 2 does not explain the reason for excluding certain students from the calculation of whether private colleges and universities are subject to the excise tax on net investment income. This lack of clarity on the policy's intent or benefit could lead to misunderstandings or unintended consequences.

  • Section 2 is highly technical and involves cross-references to existing laws, such as the Higher Education Act of 1965, which may be difficult for non-experts to understand. This complexity could create challenges in both compliance and public understanding.

  • The term 'eligible educational institution' in Section 2 is not clearly defined within the bill text itself, creating potential confusion about which institutions can apply the student exclusion.

  • Section 3 lacks sufficient detail on how the number of students is to be calculated, particularly regarding paragraph (3) of section 4968(b). This could lead to inconsistencies and confusion in complying with the reporting requirements.

  • The implications of the reporting requirements in Section 3 on the administrative costs for private colleges and universities, particularly smaller institutions, are not discussed. This omission might mean that the financial or operational burdens are not fully considered, impacting their ability to comply.

  • There is no mention in Section 3 of measures or penalties for non-compliance with the reporting requirements, which might not effectively encourage accurate or timely reporting.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the short title for this legislation is the “Protecting American Students Act.”

2. Certain students not taken into account for purposes of calculation to determine if certain private colleges and universities are subject to excise tax on net investment income Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The amendment to Section 4968(b) of the Internal Revenue Code states that for determining whether certain private colleges and universities are subject to an excise tax on their investment income, certain students will not be counted if they do not meet specific eligibility requirements. This change will take effect for taxable years starting after December 31, 2024.

3. Requirement to report certain information with respect to application of excise tax based on investment income of private colleges and universities Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill mandates that private colleges and universities report specific information regarding the number of students considered for calculating an excise tax on investment income. This amendment will apply to tax years starting after December 31, 2024.