Overview
Title
An Act To increase access to agency guidance documents.
ELI5 AI
The "GOOD Act" is like a rule for making sure all the important papers that big government groups use to guide their actions are easy to find online, so everybody can see them if they want to. This helps people understand what these groups are doing and makes everything more open and fair.
Summary AI
H.R. 890, also known as the "Guidance Out Of Darkness Act" or "GOOD Act," aims to make agency guidance documents more accessible to the public. Under this proposed law, agencies are required to publish all guidance documents online in one designated location and also link them from their websites. The Act provides a timeline for posting both newly issued and existing guidance documents, with exceptions for those exempt under the Freedom of Information Act. It also mandates a report on agency compliance within five years of enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The "Guidance Out Of Darkness Act" or "GOOD Act" is designed to improve public access to guidance documents issued by federal agencies. The bill mandates that all guidance documents be published in an accessible online format. This includes newly issued documents, which must be published on the date they are released, and existing documents, which must be published within 180 days of the Act’s enactment. The goal is to ensure transparency and accessibility of agency guidance documents, which can include memos, letters, blog posts, and speeches that interpret or explain policy but do not carry the force of law.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the crucial issues within this bill is the broad definition of "guidance document." This wide-ranging definition may lead to ambiguity regarding what qualifies as a guidance document, making it challenging to implement and understand uniformly across various agencies. The inclusion of informal items like blog posts and speeches adds to this complexity.
The bill requires all guidance documents to be published online but lacks detailed guidance on how this should be done. This absence of specifics, such as the online platforms to be used and deadlines for publication, might result in inconsistencies and delays amongst agencies. Moreover, the bill does not outline consequences for non-compliance, which could hinder its effectiveness.
Another area of concern is the lack of oversight measures to ensure compliance with the mandate that documents be accessible in a single, centralized online location. Without mechanisms to enforce this requirement, there's a risk that agencies may not fully comply, which could undermine the transparency goals of the bill.
Additionally, the language regarding the exemption of documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is vague. This could create ambiguity about which documents are exempt and potentially lead to inconsistent application across agencies, impacting transparency.
Impact on the Public and Stakeholders
Broadly, the bill, by mandating the publication of guidance documents online, aims to enhance transparency and accessibility for the general public, organizations, and businesses. This could empower individuals and entities by making it easier to understand various agency policies and interpretations that might affect them.
However, due to the expansive definition of guidance documents, there's a potential risk of information overload with a wide array of documents, some of which might not be significant to the public, leading to challenges in sifting through relevant information.
For specific stakeholders such as legal professionals, businesses, and advocacy groups, the increased accessibility to these documents could provide valuable insights into agency thinking and policy direction, potentially informing decision-making and strategy.
On the downside, stakeholders may face challenges due to the lack of clear guidelines and enforcement mechanisms within the bill. Agencies might interpret and implement the requirements differently, creating uneven access to information. This could put smaller organizations or individuals without extensive legal resources at a disadvantage compared to larger entities with the capacity to navigate complex regulatory information.
In summary, while the GOOD Act has the potential to significantly improve transparency and public access to agency guidance, its effectiveness will largely depend on how clearly and consistently it is implemented across various federal agencies.
Issues
The definition of 'guidance document' in Section 2 is broad and could lead to ambiguity in its interpretation and application, as it includes diverse items like blog posts and speeches. This expansive scope might impact the formal status and influence of such documents, leading to varied interpretations that may favor certain entities over others.
Section 3 lacks clear methods, platforms, and deadlines for the publication of guidance documents on the internet, which could lead to inconsistencies across agencies and indefinite delays. It also lacks enforcement mechanisms for non-compliance, potentially affecting transparency and accountability.
The absence of oversight or accountability measures in Section 4 regarding the publication of guidance documents in a single location may lead to inefficiencies and the risk of non-compliance by agencies, which could undermine the bill's intent to improve access.
Section 5's language about documents exempt from disclosure under FOIA is unclear and may create transparency concerns. It doesn't specify which types of guidance documents are exempt, leading to potential ambiguity and inconsistency in application.
The requirement in Section 8 for a compliance report to be submitted 'not later than 5 years' after enactment might delay accountability. The section also lacks specific criteria for evaluating compliance, leading to potential ambiguity about the report's scope and effectiveness.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act gives it its official name, stating that it may be referred to as the "Guidance Out Of Darkness Act" or the "GOOD Act".
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section defines key terms used in the Act. It explains that the term "agency" refers to what is described in section 551 of title 5, United States Code, and the "Director" means the head of the Office of Management and Budget. It also details that a "guidance document" is an agency statement that offers policy or interpretation advice but does not have the force of law, and includes various forms such as memos, letters, and speeches.
3. Publication of guidance documents on the internet Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Agencies are required to publish new guidance documents online on the day they are issued, following specific rules. Additionally, any existing guidance documents must also be published online within 180 days of the law's enactment.
4. Single location Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Agencies must publish all their guidance documents in one main location on a specific website chosen by the Director. Each agency must also feature a clear link on its own website to this location, ensuring the documents are organized as guidance and appropriately categorized.
5. Documents and information exempt from disclosure under FOIA Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
If a document or information issued by a government agency is exempt from being shared with the public under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), then it does not have to follow the rules of this Act.
6. Rescinded guidance documents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, it states that when a guidance document from an agency is officially canceled, the agency must keep a record of it and clearly show that it has been rescinded. They must also provide any court case number if the cancellation was due to a court order and note the date on which it was rescinded.
7. Rules of construction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that this Act does not affect the validity of guidance documents if they are not followed, and it does not change whether guidance documents must go through congressional review.
8. Report on agency compliance Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Comptroller General is required to submit a report on how well agencies are following the rules of the Act to specific committees in the House of Representatives and the Senate within five years of the Act being enacted.