Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable tax credit for certain gun safes.
ELI5 AI
The "SAFES Act" wants to help people keep their guns locked away safely by giving them some of their money back if they buy a new gun safe, but only up to a certain amount. The goal is to make sure everyone can have safe places to keep guns so that only the right people can use them.
Summary AI
H.R. 8877, also known as the "Storing All Firearms Effectively and Safely Act" or "SAFES Act," proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to introduce a refundable tax credit for individuals buying gun safes. The bill offers a 90% credit on the purchase of gun safes, up to $500 for individuals and $1,000 for joint returns, incurred up to six years back, starting after December 31, 2024. It also mandates that by five years following the bill's enactment, a report by the Secretary of Health and Human Services will be made public, highlighting which types of gun safes are most effective in preventing unauthorized access. The bill emphasizes that no taxpayer will be required to disclose information about owned firearms to receive this credit.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, titled the "Storing All Firearms Effectively and Safely Act" or "SAFES Act," seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It introduces a refundable tax credit for individuals who purchase certain gun safes. This credit would cover 90% of the cost for a new gun safe, up to a limit of $500 for single filers and $1,000 for joint filers. The credit applies to purchases made after December 31, 2024. For gun safes acquired after 2029, the legislation requires that they be designated as highly effective at preventing unauthorized access. The bill also includes a stipulation that no additional firearm information will be collected as a condition for claiming this credit, and mandates a report by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to identify highly effective gun safes.
Summary of Significant Issues
The proposed credit's effectiveness and reasoning raise several issues. One major concern is the potential for resource misallocation by providing substantial tax credits without targeted need or proven effectiveness in improving public safety. Furthermore, the exclusion of used gun safes from the credit may disadvantage lower-income individuals and neglect environmentally beneficial practices like recycling. The bill's language, particularly terms like "highly effective," lacks specificity, potentially leading to ambiguity in implementation and enforcement. Additionally, the absence of oversight mechanisms or periodic reviews could result in inefficiencies and potential exploitation. Lastly, the prohibition on collecting firearm information could hinder the evaluation of the policy's effectiveness in enhancing safety.
Impact on the Public
The bill could have a broad impact on the public by encouraging the purchase of gun safes, aimed at enhancing firearm safety and preventing unauthorized access. However, if the credit does not effectively incentivize purchases due to market price fluctuations or doesn't clearly define eligible safes, its intended outcomes may not be fully realized. For the general taxpayer, this legislation could represent a financial benefit if they choose to purchase qualifying safes, but it requires sufficient awareness and understanding of the program to be effectively utilized.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
The bill might positively impact manufacturers of new gun safes, potentially increasing demand for their products. However, its exclusion of used safes could limit options for budget-conscious consumers and hinder businesses operating in the second-hand market. Stakeholders within lower-income brackets may find the credit insufficient without access to more affordable recycled options. Law enforcement and public safety officials may see potential benefits if the policy succeeds in reducing unauthorized gun access, but they might be concerned about the lack of data collection, which could impede comprehensive safety assessments.
In conclusion, while the SAFES Act aims to improve firearm safety through financial incentives, key concerns about its scope and implementation could affect its success. Careful consideration of the issues raised and the inclusion of more precise language and monitoring mechanisms could enhance the bill's potential impact on both public safety and stakeholder interests.
Financial Assessment
The "Storing All Firearms Effectively and Safely Act" or "SAFES Act" introduces significant financial provisions intended to promote the safe storage of firearms. This bill proposes a refundable tax credit aimed at offsetting the cost of purchasing gun safes.
Refundable Tax Credit for Gun Safes
The centerpiece of the bill is the provision of a 90% refundable tax credit for the purchase of gun safes. This credit is designed to reduce the tax burden for individuals who buy these safes. The credit is subject to an upper limit of $500 for individuals and $1,000 for those filing jointly, applicable within a span of six years. The introduction of these financial incentives aims to encourage more individuals to securely store firearms, potentially enhancing public safety.
Issues Related to Financial Provisions
Several concerns arise regarding the financial implications of this bill:
Resource Allocation and Efficiency: The bill offers substantial financial aid through a high percentage tax credit. There is a concern that if the credit is not strategically targeted towards individuals who truly need financial assistance, it might be considered wasteful spending. The absence of evidence substantiating the effectiveness of this measure in promoting safety may call into question the allocation of resources.
Exclusion of Used Safes: The bill specifies that the credit is only applicable to new gun safes, excluding used equipment. This stipulation can negatively impact lower-income individuals who might have benefited from purchasing affordable, reused safes. This exclusion also disregards the environmental benefits of promoting the market for recycled and reused goods.
Vagueness in Definitions: After 2029, the eligibility for the tax credit requires a gun safe to be "highly effective in preventing unauthorized access." The lack of specific criteria defining this standard could result in ambiguous implementation and enforcement, potentially leading to inconsistent application of the tax credit.
Inflation and Market Changes: The cap on the credit does not adjust for inflation or rising market prices over time, which may undermine the effectiveness of the tax credit as a financial incentive in the future. This could restrict its ability to genuinely make a difference in the affordability of gun safes for taxpayers.
Oversight and Assessment Concerns
Furthermore, the bill instructs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to publish a report highlighting the most effective gun safes within five years of enactment. However, there are concerns about whether the Secretary has the requisite expertise to assess the effectiveness of gun safes. The bill does not provide any oversight or review mechanisms to continually assess the usefulness and equity of this tax credit, which could lead to inefficiencies or unintended exploitation of the financial incentive.
In conclusion, while the SAFES Act provides substantial financial incentives intended to bolster public safety, several issues require careful consideration. These include concerns over effective resource allocation, the exclusion of more affordable used safes, lack of clear criteria, and the potential shortcomings of financial caps over time. Addressing these concerns could improve the bill's efficacy as a tool for promoting firearm safety.
Issues
The provision of a 90% refundable tax credit for gun safes in Section 36C might be considered wasteful spending if it is not targeted towards a specific need or if there is no substantiated evidence of its effectiveness in enhancing public safety. This raises concerns about resource allocation and fiscal responsibility in Section 2.
The definition of eligible gun safes in Section 36C(b), particularly the exclusion of used safes ('original use begins with the taxpayer'), may disadvantage lower-income individuals and fail to promote environmentally beneficial practices related to the market for recycled goods, as addressed in Section 2.
The phrase 'highly effective in preventing unauthorized access' for post-2029 eligible gun safes in Section 36C(a)(2) is vague, potentially leading to ambiguity or inconsistency in enforcement if clear criteria are not established, as noted in Section 36C.
There is no mention of oversight or periodic review mechanisms in Section 36C to ensure the ongoing effectiveness and fairness of the tax credit's implementation, which might lead to inefficiencies or exploitation.
The prohibition on the collection of information regarding firearms as a condition for receiving the credit in Section 36C(d) may limit the effective assessment of the policy's impact on gun safety and unauthorized access prevention, potentially affecting future policy adjustments.
The report on the most effective gun safes required in Section 3 does not specify clear criteria for determining 'highly effective' gun safes, possibly leading to ambiguity, and there may be concerns regarding whether the Secretary of Health and Human Services has the appropriate expertise to undertake this task.
The limitation of the lifetime tax credit amount over a taxpayer's lifetime in Section 36C(b) may not sufficiently account for inflation or changes in market prices, potentially reducing the credit's effectiveness as an incentive over time.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this act specifies its short title, which is the “Storing All Firearms Effectively and Safely Act” or the “SAFES Act”.
2. Refundable credit for certain gun safes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill introduces a tax credit for individuals who buy new gun safes, covering 90% of the cost up to $500 per year, or $1,000 for joint filers, with restrictions on claiming in consecutive years and no requirement to disclose firearm information. The credit applies to purchases after December 31, 2024, with future credit only for safes deemed highly effective in preventing unauthorized access.
Money References
- “(a) In general.—In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle for any taxable year an amount equal to 90 percent of the aggregate amount paid or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year for— “(1) in the case of any taxable year beginning before January 1, 2030, any gun safe, and “(2) in the case of any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2029, any gun safe which is of a type which has been determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the report made publicly available under section 3 of the SAFES Act to be highly effective in preventing unauthorized access. “(b) Limitation.—The amount allowed as a credit under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the excess (if any) of— “(1) $500 ($1,000 in the case of a joint return), over “(2) the aggregate amount of credits allowed under this section with respect to such taxpayer during the 6 preceding taxable years. “
36C. Credit for certain gun safes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Individuals can receive a tax credit for purchasing gun safes, covering 90% of the cost, up to a limit of $500 (or $1,000 for joint returns) within a seven-year period. The law specifies that eligible gun safes must be very effective at preventing unauthorized access, and it prohibits the collection of information about firearms for claiming this tax credit.
Money References
- (b) Limitation.—The amount allowed as a credit under subsection (a) with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year shall not exceed the excess (if any) of— (1) $500 ($1,000 in the case of a joint return), over (2) the aggregate amount of credits allowed under this section with respect to such taxpayer during the 6 preceding taxable years. (c) Gun safe.—For purposes of this section— (1) IN GENERAL.—The term “gun safe” means— (A) any device that is designed and marketed for the principal purpose of denying unauthorized access to a firearm or ammunition, and (B) any safe, gun safe, gun case, lock box, or other device that is secured by a combination lock, key lock, or lock based on biometric information which, once locked, is incapable of being opened without the combination, key, or biometric information, respectively. (2) EXCLUSION OF USED SAFES.—Such term shall not include any property unless the original use of such property begins with the taxpayer.
3. Report on most effective gun safes Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Health and Human Services is required to release a report within five years of the law's enactment. This report will identify the types of gun safes that are most effective at preventing unauthorized access.