Overview

Title

An Act To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire, as the Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to change the name of a post office in Greenland, New Hampshire, to honor a special person named Chief Michael Maloney. It means all the official papers and signs will use his name for the post office.

Summary AI

H.R. 8868 proposes to rename the United States Postal Service facility at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire, as the “Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building.” This act ensures that any future reference to this postal facility in legal or official documents will include its new designation. The bill has successfully passed the House of Representatives and has been forwarded to the Senate.

Published

2024-12-05
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: SENATE
Status: Referred in Senate
Date: 2024-12-05
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8868rfs

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
208
Pages:
2
Sentences:
4

Language

Nouns: 82
Verbs: 13
Adjectives: 2
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 8
Entities: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.38
Average Sentence Length:
52.00
Token Entropy:
4.27
Readability (ARI):
28.60

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation, H.R. 8868, seeks to name a United States Postal Service facility located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire, as the "Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building." This designation process is straightforward: once enacted, any legal, regulatory, or informal references to this postal facility will recognize its new name.

Significant Issues

Despite its simplicity, the bill raises several issues, primarily revolving around transparency and rationale. There is no explanation within the bill regarding why the name ‘Chief Michael Maloney’ was chosen. The lack of context may lead to questions about the decision-making process and the criteria used for this designation.

Notably absent are any insights into whether consultations took place with local communities or relevant stakeholders when selecting the facility's new name. Transparency in such processes is crucial to avoid any appearance of favoritism and to ensure fairness. Moreover, while the physical act of renaming is not costly in itself, the bill does not include details about the potential expenses associated with changing signage, official documents, or maps, nor does it specify how these costs will be covered.

Impact on the Public

The impact of this bill on the general public is likely minimal. For most people, the change in name of a postal facility does not affect their daily interactions with the postal service, aside from potential updates in address labeling. However, without understanding the reasoning behind the designation, some individuals might question the relevance or appropriateness of the honor.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Locally, the naming of a federal building holds symbolic importance. If Chief Michael Maloney has significant local or historical relevance, this designation could be a point of community pride. It serves to honor his contributions and memory – assuming such connections.

Conversely, stakeholders such as local historians or community leaders may express concern or opposition if the selection process was not inclusive or if Chief Maloney's contributions are not widely recognized or deemed controversial. The absence of a clear, transparent decision-making process could lead to dissatisfaction or perceived injustices among those with stakes in local history or community identity.

Conclusion

The bill presents a simple yet symbolically significant change in naming a postal facility. However, the lack of transparency, rationale, and consideration of potential costs within the text suggests room for improvement. Addressing these issues proactively could enhance public understanding and support, ensuring the name change serves its intended purpose of honoring an individual without raising concerns of favoritism or exclusion.

Issues

  • The text does not explain if there were any consultations or criteria used to determine the suitability of naming the facility after Chief Michael Maloney, which might lead to questions about the decision-making process. [Section 1]

  • There is no explanation of the significance of the designation, which may lead to questioning why this particular name was chosen and if it is appropriate. [Section 1]

  • The designation process in the bill lacks transparency, which is important to ensure fairness and prevent perceived favoritism. The text fails to mention any processes or criteria used for naming federal buildings. [Section 1]

  • The designation of a building with a specific name may not involve direct spending, but it could lead to costs associated with changing signage, stationery, and documents. The bill lacks detail on the estimated costs involved in the renaming process and how they will be covered. [Section 1]

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire, to be officially renamed the "Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building." Any mention of this postal facility in U.S. laws, maps, or documents will now refer to it by this new name.