Overview

Title

An Act To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire, as the Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to change the name of a post office in Greenland, New Hampshire, to honor a person named Chief Michael Maloney, so from now on, everyone will call it the "Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building."

Summary AI

H. R. 8868 is a bill that designates the United States Postal Service facility located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire, to be named the "Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building." This change applies to all references in laws, maps, regulations, documents, papers, or other records of the United States.

Published

2024-12-21
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: JOINT
Status: Enrolled Bill
Date: 2024-12-21
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8868enr

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
1
Words:
183
Pages:
1
Sentences:
8

Language

Nouns: 70
Verbs: 8
Adjectives: 3
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 7
Entities: 20

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.22
Average Sentence Length:
22.88
Token Entropy:
4.26
Readability (ARI):
13.33

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

This legislative document, designated as H.R. 8868, seeks to rename a facility of the United States Postal Service located at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire. The proposal is to call this facility the "Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building." This piece of legislation is a straightforward act focusing on naming a public building to honor an individual presumed to have significant importance, although the text does not provide further context about the honoree.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the text of this bill:

  1. Lack of Context and Justification: The bill does not offer any justification or background information about Chief Michael Maloney or why this particular post office is being renamed in his honor. Without context, the public may question the criteria used for selecting this name.

  2. Transparency in Naming Process: The process by which federal buildings are named should be transparent. The bill does not mention whether there was any form of consultation or predetermined criteria that guided this decision. This absence of process documentation raises questions about the fairness and transparency of the naming procedure.

  3. Cost Considerations: Renaming a postal facility may not involve direct government spending, but there could be incidental costs, such as changing signage, updating stationery, or modifying documents and records. The bill does not estimate these costs or detail how they would be covered.

Potential Public Impact

The general public might experience minimal impact from this administrative change. However, the significance lies in the symbolic gesture of honoring individuals through federal building names. The lack of transparency and context might lead to skepticism or a sense of exclusion from those not privy to the reasons behind the renaming decision.

Stakeholder Impacts

Community and Family of Chief Michael Maloney: Assuming Chief Maloney has connections to the local or broader community, this act could be a source of pride and recognition for his family and local stakeholders who might celebrate their connection to a federally recognized building.

Taxpayers: There could be minor concerns regarding any public funds allocated for the rebranding of the postal facility. Taxpayers may expect clear communication on why and how funds are used when altering publicly owned properties.

United States Postal Service: As the responsible entity for implementing the name change, the USPS might encounter logistical and financial implications. This includes ensuring that all references to the facility in official documentation are updated to align with the new naming requirement.

By addressing these elements, the commentary captures the essence of the legislative initiative while rigorously exploring the practical implications and concerns surrounding the bill.

Issues

  • The process for naming federal buildings should be transparent to ensure fairness and prevent perceived favoritism; the text lacks any mention of such processes. (Section 1)

  • There is no explanation of the significance of the designation, which may lead to questioning why this particular name was chosen. (Section 1)

  • The text does not explain if there were any consultations or criteria used to determine the suitability of naming the facility after Chief Michael Maloney. (Section 1)

  • The text lacks detail on the estimated costs involved in the renaming process and how they will be covered. (Section 1)

  • The designation of a building with a specific name may not involve direct spending, but it could lead to costs associated with changing signage, stationery, and documents. (Section 1)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill designates the United States Postal Service facility at 609 Portsmouth Avenue in Greenland, New Hampshire, to be officially renamed the "Chief Michael Maloney Post Office Building." Any mention of this postal facility in U.S. laws, maps, or documents will now refer to it by this new name.