Overview
Title
To establish Department of Homeland Security funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that have a relationship with Confucius Institutes, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
This bill says that schools in the United States won't get money from Homeland Security if they have special deals or connections with certain places in China, like Confucius Institutes. If they want to keep getting money, they have to stop those connections.
Summary AI
H. R. 881 aims to restrict funding from the Department of Homeland Security to colleges and universities that have relationships with Confucius Institutes, the Thousand Talents Program, or other Chinese entities of concern. To continue receiving funding, these institutions must end any contracts, agreements, or gifts from these entities. The bill also mandates a report from the Department of Homeland Security to Congress detailing any institutions with such relationships that are receiving funds.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Bill
H.R. 881 is a legislative proposal introduced in the 119th Congress. The primary aim of the bill is to establish funding restrictions for institutions of higher education that maintain a relationship with Confucius Institutes or are associated with entities labeled as "Chinese entities of concern." These restrictions pertain specifically to funding from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The bill mandates that any university or college having ties with these Chinese entities must terminate such relationships to retain eligibility for DHS funds. Additionally, it requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to report on institutions that maintain such associations while receiving federal funds.
Significant Issues
Several significant issues arise from the text of the bill:
Ambiguous Definitions: The bill uses terms like "Chinese entity of concern" and provides criteria that include vague and broad descriptions, such as "purposefully undermines the United States’ relationship with Taiwan." These descriptors might lead to varied interpretations and inconsistent application.
Lack of Clarity in Process: The bill does not clearly define how educational institutions can terminate their relationships with specified Chinese entities to regain funding eligibility, which could create confusion and hinder compliance.
Undefined Enforcement Role: The Secretary of Homeland Security's role in enforcing these restrictions is not detailed well enough, leading to potential uncertainty in how the bill would be practically implemented.
No Appeal Process: There is no provision for institutions to appeal or dispute their classification as having a relationship with these entities, potentially resulting in fairness and transparency concerns.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill reflects growing concerns regarding the influence of foreign entities in the United States. If enacted, it might reassure the public about the integrity of higher education institutions and reduce foreign influence in academic settings. However, it could also lead to increased administrative burdens on universities as they navigate compliance with these restrictions.
Impact on Stakeholders
Universities and Colleges: Institutions of higher education that host Confucius Institutes or have ties to specified Chinese entities would face significant impacts. They might need to assess and possibly sever established partnerships or risk losing federal funding from the DHS. This could lead to a reduction in academic resources or partnerships that some institutions currently find beneficial.
Chinese Educational and Cultural Exchanges: The bill could strain U.S.-China educational and cultural exchanges. Confucius Institutes, often seen as facilitators of cultural and language programs, might face closures, limiting students' access to these opportunities.
U.S. Government and National Security Agencies: From a government perspective, the bill could enhance oversight and control over foreign influence in higher education, aligning with broader national security strategies. However, the effective implementation depends on resolving ambiguities and defining clear processes and roles.
Overall, while aiming to secure the national interest, the bill presents challenges related to definitions, enforcement, and institutional compliance that require careful consideration and possibly, further legislative refinement to ensure balance and fairness.
Issues
The term 'Chinese entity of concern' used in Section 2 includes vague criteria such as 'purposefully undermines the United States’ relationship with Taiwan,' which could lead to varied interpretations and potential inconsistencies in enforcement.
Section 2 lacks a detailed process for how an 'institution of higher education' can terminate its relationship with a Confucius Institute or Chinese entity of concern to regain fund eligibility, potentially leaving institutions without clear guidance.
The role of the Secretary of Homeland Security in enforcing the restrictions and limitations described in Section 2 is not sufficiently defined, creating potential uncertainty in its implementation.
The definition of 'Chinese entity of concern' in Section 2 includes broad terms such as 'engages in malicious activities,' which might be difficult to enforce consistently and could lead to arbitrary or uneven application.
Section 2 does not specify how the information reported by the Secretary of Homeland Security will be used by the relevant committees, creating ambiguity around the purpose and subsequent actions taken based on the report.
There is no provision in Section 2 for institutions of higher education to appeal or dispute their classification or the determination of a relationship with the entities mentioned, which could lead to potential disputes or challenges regarding fairness.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act gives it a short title: the "DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act."
2. Limitations on Confucius Institutes’ host schools Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that any college or university affiliated with a Confucius Institute or the Thousand Talents Program or any Chinese entity of concern will not receive funds from the Department of Homeland Security unless they sever these ties. It also mandates a report to Congress on colleges with these connections that still receive funds.