Overview
Title
An Act To establish Department of Homeland Security funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that have a relationship with Confucius Institutes, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 881 is about making sure colleges in the U.S. don't get special money from the Department of Homeland Security if they work with certain Chinese groups, like Confucius Institutes, unless these partnerships are considered safe for the country.
Summary AI
H.R. 881, known as the “DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act,” proposes to restrict Department of Homeland Security funding to U.S. higher education institutions that have ties with Confucius Institutes or certain Chinese entities. If a school has partnerships or receives support from these organizations, it cannot receive DHS funding unless it ends the relationship. There is a provision for the Secretary of Homeland Security to issue waivers if the relationship is deemed secure and in the national interest. The bill also requires DHS to assist schools in understanding and following these rules and mandates regular reports on the bill's implementation.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, known as the "DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act," is designed to address concerns regarding the influence of foreign entities, specifically those related to China, within U.S. institutions of higher education. The legislation seeks to restrict funding from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to colleges and universities that maintain relationships with Confucius Institutes, the Thousand Talents Program, and certain identified Chinese entities deemed as "entities of concern."
Bill Summary
At its core, the bill mandates that any U.S. college or university with ties to these identified entities will lose eligibility for DHS funding unless they sever those relationships. A waiver can be granted by the Secretary of Homeland Security if stringent conditions demonstrating strong security measures are met. Additionally, the bill requires regular reporting to Congress regarding the implementation and impact of these restrictions.
Significant Issues
Several significant issues have been identified in connection with this legislation. Foremost, the bill's definitions of key terms like "Chinese entity of concern" and "Confucius Institute" are broad and may possess a level of ambiguity. Such broad terminology could inadvertently affect a wide range of educational institutions beyond those intended. The waiver provision also endows considerable discretionary power to the Secretary of Homeland Security, which could result in subjective or inconsistent application, raising concerns about fairness.
Furthermore, the process for renewing waivers lacks clarity, specifically about how conditions will be consistently evaluated. The absence of specific guidance on what constitutes the "national security interests" allows for subjective interpretation, which could lead to arbitrary decisions.
Potential Impact on the Public
Broadly, the legislation could lead to a reevaluation of international partnerships by U.S. educational institutions to avoid losing federal funding. This could result in reduced opportunities for students to engage with educational programs that were previously available through such international collaborations.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Educational Institutions: Universities and colleges might face financial challenges if they lose federal funding due to existing international partnerships. Institutions may need to allocate resources to evaluate and potentially restructure international agreements to comply with the new law.
Students and Researchers: Students and academia engaged in programs or research supported by these partnerships could find themselves without the resources or opportunities that were previously available. While this may encourage a focus on safety and national security, it could also limit academic freedoms and the scope of international collaboration.
National Security Agencies: The bill strengthens certain oversight mechanisms with respect to foreign relationships of concern. However, without clear guidelines and consistent application, these measures might lead to inconsistencies in national security efforts.
Conclusion
While the "DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act" aims to protect national interests by scrutinizing foreign influence within educational settings, its broad definitions and discretionary waiver processes present potential challenges. It will require careful implementation to ensure that it does not unintentionally hinder educational collaborations while holding genuine security concerns in check. How well this balance is maintained will determine the extent of the bill’s long-term impact on educational institutions and national security.
Issues
The definitions provided for 'Chinese entity of concern' and 'Confucius Institute' in Section 2 are complex and may require further clarification to ensure they are not overly broad or ambiguous, potentially affecting numerous institutions of higher education across the U.S.
The waiver provision in Section 2 grants significant discretionary power to the Secretary of Homeland Security and requires consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, which could lead to inconsistent application if not clearly defined, affecting the fairness and transparency of the process.
The language regarding the renewal of waivers in Section 2 is potentially unclear, specifically how 'all of the conditions described in such paragraph continue to be satisfied' will be regularly and uniformly assessed, potentially leading to unequal treatment of institutions.
Section 2 does not specify how the Secretary of Homeland Security will ensure compliance and adequately monitor institutions, which could lead to unequal enforcement or oversight issues and might undermine the bill's objectives.
There is no specific guidance in Section 2 on what constitutes the national security interests of the United States under subclause (A) of the waiver condition, potentially leading to subjective interpretations and problematic applications.
The requirement for notification to congressional committees 30 days before waiver issuance or renewal in Section 2 may not be sufficient time for oversight or action if concerns arise, potentially affecting the transparency and accountability of the waiver process.
The reporting requirement in Section 2 outlines that reports should include institutions with relationships to the concerning entities but may lack transparency or public access, limiting broader scrutiny and potentially affecting public trust.
The technical assistance provision in Section 2 lacks detail on what forms of assistance will be provided, which might affect the consistency and usefulness of support offered to institutions of higher education, impacting their ability to comply with the law.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act gives it a short title: the "DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act."
2. Limitations on Confucius Institutes’ host schools Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits U.S. colleges and universities with ties to Confucius Institutes, the Thousand Talents Program, or certain Chinese institutions from receiving funds from the Department of Homeland Security unless they cut these relationships. However, the Secretary of Homeland Security can grant waivers if there are strong security measures in place, and must report to Congress on how these rules are being followed.