Overview

Title

To amend subpart 2 of part B of the Social Security Act to promote community-based prevention services, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 8798 is a plan to change some social security rules to help more families by providing places where they can get free support and feel less lonely. It's like creating friendly centers in communities where families can go for help without having to pay.

Summary AI

H.R. 8798 proposes changes to the Social Security Act, specifically targeting subpart 2 of part B, with the goal of enhancing community-based prevention services. The bill highlights the importance of family resource centers, which serve as supportive community or school-based hubs that provide multi-generational, strengths-based, and family-centered support without cost, aiming to reduce isolation and stress among families. It specifies that the financial support for services provided by these centers can be categorized under various family support services. The amendments are set to take effect on October 1, 2026, with a possible delay if states require legislative action to comply with the new requirements.

Published

2024-06-21
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-06-21
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8798ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
613
Pages:
3
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 189
Verbs: 56
Adjectives: 26
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 26
Entities: 39

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.14
Average Sentence Length:
55.73
Token Entropy:
4.87
Readability (ARI):
29.32

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

H.R. 8798, introduced by Mr. Carey and Mr. Larson of Connecticut, seeks to amend part of the Social Security Act to promote community-based prevention services through the utilization of family resource centers. These centers serve as community or school-based hubs that offer support, services, and opportunities to families at little to no cost, aiming to build communities of peer support. The amendments would officially take effect on October 1, 2026.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues emerge with the proposed bill. Firstly, the broad definition of "family resource center" could potentially lead to misuse or misallocation of funds. This is because various types of entities might qualify for funding, including those that might not have the appropriate oversight or genuine purpose. Secondly, the bill allows expenditures for these centers to be treated as various family services without clear criteria, which could result in ambiguous and inconsistent funding allocation across different states.

Furthermore, the provision for an effective date stipulating that state legislation might be required introduces potential delays in implementing these changes. This delay could affect the timely delivery of critical services that these centers aim to provide. Finally, the lack of specific guidelines for categorizing expenditures related to family resource centers may lead to inconsistent application of funds, hindering effective oversight and accountability.

Potential Public Impact

Broadly, this bill aims to enhance community-based support for families, which could foster stronger community ties and better social support systems. If implemented effectively, family resource centers could reduce isolation and stress among families, contributing to healthier communities. However, due to the broad definition and lack of clear criteria, there is a risk of misdirected resources that could impact the quality and availability of services offered.

Impact on Stakeholders

For families, particularly those in underserved communities, the bill could present a chance to access crucial services that promote family well-being and stability. Schools and community organizations stand to benefit by potentially expanding their role as community support hubs, thereby increasing their impact.

On the other hand, state governments and agencies responsible for overseeing the implementation may face challenges due to the lack of specific guidelines. They would need to develop frameworks to ensure consistent and effective application of the bill’s provisions across their jurisdictions, which might require significant time and resources.

In summary, while the bill holds the promise of strengthening community-based prevention services, its broad definitions and lack of specific guidelines could pose significant challenges. Careful implementation and monitoring will be required to ensure the intended benefits reach those who need them most.

Issues

  • The broad definition of 'family resource center' in Section 2 could lead to misuse or misallocation of funds as it applies to a wide range of entities, potentially allowing organizations without appropriate oversight or purpose to qualify for funding.

  • The provision in Section 2 that allows expenditures for family resource centers to be treated as various types of family services without clear criteria may result in ambiguities and inconsistent application in funding allocation across different states.

  • The effective date provision in Section 2 allows for state legislation requirements that may introduce significant delays in implementing the amendments, potentially affecting the timely provision of vital services to communities.

  • The special rule in Section 2(10)(B) lacks specific guidelines on how expenditures should be categorized, which might result in inconsistent application and oversight of funds dedicated to family resource centers across states.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section of the bill provides the official short title, which is "Promoting Community-Based Prevention Services Act."

2. Promotion of community-based prevention services Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section clarifies the role of family resource centers in providing support services to families and allows these centers to be considered for certain types of social services funding. It specifies that the changes will take effect on October 1, 2026, unless a state needs to pass new laws to comply, in which case there may be a delay.