Overview
Title
To revise sections 552, 1461, and 1462 of title 18, United States Code, and section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1305), and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 8796 wants to change some old rules so that people don't get confused about what's okay to send in the mail or bring into the country, like not having unclear rules about things that are just for grown-ups or things that may involve abortions. This bill is trying to make sure those rules are clear and up-to-date.
Summary AI
H. R. 8796, known as the "Stop Comstock Act," proposes changes to parts of the United States Code and the Tariff Act of 1930 related to obscene materials. Specifically, it seeks to amend sections 552, 1461, and 1462 of title 18 to remove certain language about indecent materials and items associated with abortion. Additionally, it proposes changes to section 305 of the Tariff Act to remove similar references concerning immoral materials and abortion-related items. The bill aims to update the legal language and definitions regarding obscene materials.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The Stop Comstock Act seeks to amend certain sections of title 18 of the United States Code, which deals with crimes and criminal procedure, specifically concerning materials deemed obscene. It also aims to modify section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930, focusing on regulating the importation of obscene and immoral materials. This legislative proposal is put forth to modernize and clarify the language around what constitutes obscene material in US law, eliminating certain terms like "indecent" and "immoral."
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the major changes in this bill is the removal of the term "indecent" from federal statutes concerning obscene materials. This alteration raises questions about what would now be considered outside the bounds of legality, potentially narrowing the scope of prohibited materials. Furthermore, striking references to "means for procuring abortion, or other articles of indecent or immoral use" could impact access to reproductive health products, leading to significant ethical and legal debates regarding reproductive rights.
The bill also modifies the Tariff Act of 1930 by removing language that pertains to "immoral" materials and activities, such as "unlawful abortion." This change could result in adjustments to how these materials are regulated upon importation.
Broad Public Impact
For the public at large, these revisions might appear as a shift toward broader freedom of expression, reducing restrictions on materials previously categorized as indecent or immoral. However, the elimination of certain terms without clear definitions or justifications might lead to ambiguities that could complicate enforcement and interpretation of these laws, possibly stirring public debate about moral and social standards.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For stakeholders involved in reproductive health, these amendments could be deeply significant. The language change might impact the availability and legal standing of certain reproductive health products, thus influencing users' rights and access.
Law enforcement officials and legal practitioners may face challenges in aligning their practices with the new language in the bill, as it could alter how laws are interpreted and enforced regarding obscene materials. Additionally, those advocating for free speech might see these changes as a step toward less restrictive laws. Conversely, groups focused on public decency may be concerned that the removal of terms like "indecent" could make it harder to regulate content that they deem harmful to societal values.
In summary, while the Stop Comstock Act aims to update and clarify existing laws, it raises substantial questions about its implications for legality, accessibility, and moral standards in society. The absence of detailed rationale for these adjustments could lead to diverse interpretations and require stakeholders to navigate significant legal and ethical landscapes.
Issues
The amendment in Section 2(a)(1)(A) removes the term 'indecent' which may lead to ambiguity about what materials are covered and could lead to materials previously considered illegal being excluded, thus raising questions about the legal and social implications of these changes.
Section 2(a)(1)(B) strikes language related to 'means for procuring abortion, or other articles of indecent or immoral use or tendency', potentially affecting access to reproductive health products and raising ethical and legal concerns regarding reproductive rights.
The amendment in Section 2(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 strikes language covering 'immoral' materials and activities like 'unlawful abortion', which could result in changes to how import regulations are enforced and might have significant social and political implications.
Section 2(a)(2)(A) rephrases laws regarding obscene materials without providing a clear rationale, leading to ambiguities that could affect interpretation and enforcement, and potentially altering the balance between protecting public decency and freedom of expression.
The amendments make significant changes to federal laws related to obscene and indecent materials without explaining the rationale, which could lead to misunderstandings or misinterpretations about the importance and implications of these changes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Stop Comstock Act refers to the short title of a legislative bill.
2. Obscene materials Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section discusses changes to laws about obscene materials, removing outdated phrases and clarifying what is considered obscene. It also amends the Tariff Act of 1930 by eliminating parts related to immoral content and unlawful abortion, refining the language around what the Secretary handles.