Overview
Title
An Act To expedite under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and improve forest management activities on National Forest System lands, on public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, and on Tribal lands to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 8790, the "Fix Our Forests Act," is a plan to help clean up and take care of forests that are too full and catch fire easily, by using tools and teamwork to make them safer and healthier for everyone.
Summary AI
H.R. 8790, known as the "Fix Our Forests Act," is a legislative proposal aimed at expediting forest management activities across various jurisdictions, including National Forest System lands, public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, and Tribal lands. The bill seeks to address the challenges of overgrown and fire-prone forests by implementing measures such as hazardous fuels management, promoting collaborative tools to reduce wildfire risk, and improving forest health. It also emphasizes transparency, technology development, and the expansion of public-private partnerships to enhance forest resilience and ecosystem restoration. Additionally, the act includes provisions for litigation reform and community-focused wildfire defense initiatives to protect vulnerable areas in the wildland-urban interfaces.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Overview of the Fix Our Forests Act
The "Fix Our Forests Act" is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing forest management activities on National Forest System lands, public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, and Tribal lands. Its goals include reducing wildfire risks, improving forest health, protecting communities situated in wildland-urban interfaces, and utilizing technology and partnerships for better forest resilience. The Act also places emphasis on specific initiatives such as supporting white oak tree restoration and provides measures for improving transparency and accountability in forest management.
Significant Issues
Environmental Concerns and NEPA Exclusions
One of the bill's most significant aspects is its exclusion from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements for the designation of fireshed management areas. This could raise environmental concerns by potentially limiting public engagement and oversight, as decisions could be made without comprehensive environmental reviews.
Vegetation Management and Hazard Trees
The bill proposes increasing the distance for managing hazard trees near power lines from 10 feet to 150 feet. This increase may lead to substantial changes in how vegetation is managed, potentially affecting a large swath of ecosystem. There is concern that this might result in significant financial and environmental implications without detailed guidelines.
Focus on Specific Tree Species
Sections focusing on specific tree species, such as the white oak, could be seen as prioritizing certain ecological needs over others. The rationale behind this prioritization is not well-explained, which may lead to questions about potential favoritism or bias. This could be a pressing concern among environmental stakeholders advocating for broader ecological diversity.
Potential Impacts on the Public
General Public
For the broader public, the Act's initiatives on wildfire risk reduction and community protection may offer significant safety benefits, particularly for those living in fire-prone areas. By encouraging more effective forest management, the likelihood of destructive wildfires could be reduced, potentially saving homes, lives, and reducing economic losses.
Specific Stakeholders
Environmental Groups: While some environmental groups may welcome the focus on wildfire reduction and forest restoration, others might express concern over the Act's NEPA exclusions, which could lead to decisions being made without adequate environmental assessments.
State and Local Governments: The reliance on state laws for definitions related to special districts may introduce inconsistencies that state and local governments need to address, potentially causing confusion and collaboration challenges.
Indigenous Tribes: Tribal lands are directly mentioned in the Act, suggesting opportunities for enhanced forest resilience and management in partnership with Tribal governments. However, potential jurisdictional ambiguities may arise, necessitating clear communication and collaboration.
Fire Management Agencies: Agencies may benefit from streamlined processes and improved coordination. However, increased responsibilities, such as reporting and data tracking, may require additional resources and funding that the Act does not currently provide.
Financial Implications
The bill's provisions, particularly those lacking clearly defined budget allocations or funding sources, might raise concerns about financial accountability. The absence of spending caps in certain sections could lead to unplanned or excessive expenditures, prompting calls for more rigorous fiscal oversight.
Conclusion
The Fix Our Forests Act presents a comprehensive approach to addressing wildfire risks and improving forest health across various land types in the United States. While it offers potential benefits in safety and ecological resilience, significant concerns remain, particularly regarding environmental review processes, financial accountability, and equitable focus on diverse ecological needs. The Act's effectiveness will likely depend on the careful implementation of its provisions and ongoing engagement with a broad range of stakeholders.
Financial Assessment
Financial Summary
H.R. 8790, known as the "Fix Our Forests Act," contains several financial references primarily related to project funding and financial support mechanisms. The bill adjusts spending thresholds, such as amending Section 14(d) of the National Forest Management Act of 1976 by increasing the threshold from $10,000 to $55,000. This change allows for more significant financial outlays for certain types of projects without additional approvals, reflecting inflation adjustments and increased costs over time.
Financial Allocations and Related Issues
One key financial element addressed is the expansion of project size limits from 3,000 acres to 10,000 acres in Section 106. This increase might raise concerns about environmental impacts due to larger projects being potentially funded or approved with less oversight, which can lead to significant political and legal debates regarding financial accountability and resource use.
In Section 401, the Wildland Fire Management Casualty Assistance Program includes provisions for reimbursing next-of-kin's travel expenses when visiting injured firefighters or wildland fire support personnel. The absence of a cap on these reimbursements poses a risk of incurring excessive costs, putting financial strain on the program's budget and requiring careful monitoring to avoid unplanned spending increases.
Vague Financial References
Sections such as 505, 506, and 507 display a lack of clarity regarding funding sources and budget allocations. This ambiguity could hinder the bill's implementation by introducing potential financial accountability concerns. Without clear delineation of how these programs will be funded and managed financially, there's a risk of unplanned spending, which can impact the effectiveness of the proposed forest management and restoration activities.
Consistency and Jurisdictional Concerns
The reliance on state laws for defining "special district" in Section 111 may lead to inconsistencies due to variations across different states. Such legal discrepancies can affect not only how funds are allocated and managed but also raise challenges in ensuring nationwide uniformity in financial disbursement and project execution.
Overall, while H.R. 8790 aims to address forest management and restoration with substantial financial inputs, careful attention to the specifics of funding sources, program costs, and spending limits is crucial to effectively manage and optimize the financial resources involved.
Issues
The exclusion of NEPA requirements for the designation of fireshed management areas in Section 101 may raise environmental concerns and limit public engagement or oversight, which could be politically and legally significant.
The ambiguity and lack of specificity in Section 203 regarding the increased distance from 10 feet to 150 feet for hazard tree removal near power lines may lead to significant changes in vegetation management efforts and could have financial and environmental implications.
The potential overlap and lack of definitions for certain terms, such as 'wildfire exposure' and 'fireshed management areas', in Sections 104 and 101 could lead to confusion and inefficiencies in implementation, affecting legal clarity and resource allocation.
The provision in Section 304 for a GAO study on the feasibility of a new Federal agency for wildland fire response could imply significant future government expenditure, which carries financial and political ramifications.
The adjustment of project size limits from 3,000 acres to 10,000 acres in Section 106 might lead to concerns about environmental impact or reduced oversight, which could be politically and legally contentious.
Favoritism or prioritization concerns are present in Sections 501, 503, and 507, focusing heavily on white oak species over other ecological needs without clear justification, potentially leading to ethical issues.
The lack of clarity regarding funding sources and budget allocations in multiple sections, such as Sections 505, 506, and 507, raises financial accountability concerns and the potential for unplanned spending.
The reliance on state laws for the definition of 'special district' in Section 111 may lead to inconsistencies across different states, posing legal challenges.
The broad and complex language across the bill, such as in Sections 105 and 301, might make it difficult for non-experts to understand, limiting transparency and public accessibility.
In Section 401, the absence of a cap or limit on reimbursement for next-of-kin travel expenses could lead to excessive costs, raising financial concerns.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The "Fix Our Forests Act" outlines a comprehensive plan to address wildfire risks and improve forest health through landscape-scale restoration, protecting communities in wildland-urban interfaces, and increasing transparency and technology use. It also includes measures for firefighter casualty assistance, strengthening white oak resilience, and enhancing public-private partnerships for water source protection.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section provides definitions for terms used in the bill, including roles such as the Director of the Fireshed Center and Secretaries of Departments, as well as concepts like firesheds, forest plans, and hazardous fuels management activities. It also clarifies the meaning of geographic areas like National Forest System lands and Indian forest land or rangeland, and identifies entities such as State, special district, and relevant Congressional Committees.
101. Designation of fireshed management areas Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes guidelines for identifying and managing "fireshed management areas" to reduce wildfire risks. These areas are selected based on wildfire exposure risks, and the selection process includes consultation with relevant authorities and uses mapping updates every five years. The selection is exempt from the National Environmental Policy Act requirements.
102. Fireshed center Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Fireshed Center, established by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of the Forest Service, will consist of representatives from various federal agencies to assess and manage fire and smoke risks. Its purposes include improving data tools, promoting coordination among different levels of government and organizations, and streamlining processes related to wildland fire management and recovery.
103. Fireshed registry Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary, through the Director of the Fireshed Center, to maintain a publicly accessible Fireshed Registry that includes detailed geospatial data on wildfire risks and management activities for individual firesheds. It also mandates the availability of this data for local communities to aid in developing community wildfire protection plans, as well as the maintenance of a database to track federal environmental reviews and the effectiveness of fireshed management projects.
104. Shared stewardship Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that the Secretary must, within 90 days of receiving a request, make a shared stewardship agreement with a state's Governor or an Indian Tribe to work together on reducing wildfire risks and assessing areas prone to fires. It also mentions that these agreements can be updated to include more areas or to address new wildfire dangers if the Governor or Tribe asks for it.
105. Fireshed assessments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section details the process and requirements for conducting fireshed assessments, where the Secretary and state Governors or Indian Tribes evaluate wildfire risks within designated areas and plan projects to manage these risks, prioritizing community safety and environmental protection. Additionally, it allows for local government participation, uses advanced technology and data for assessments, and excludes National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) processes.
106. Emergency fireshed management Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the initiation and management of fireshed projects by designated officials to reduce wildfire risks through activities like hazardous fuel management, tree removal, and vegetation control. It also expands existing rules and areas for fire management, including new definitions and increased maximum areas for treatment projects under various acts such as the Healthy Forests Restoration Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
107. Sunset Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The authority granted by this section of the law will end 7 years after the law is first put into action.
111. Modification of the treatment of certain revenue and payments under good neighbor agreements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to Section 8206 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 expand the definition of entities eligible to manage funds from good neighbor agreements to include "special districts" and extend the deadline for using these funds from 2024 to 2029. Additionally, the amendments allow these entities to use the funds for various restoration and road management activities and apply to projects started both before and after the enactment of the new bill.
112. Fixing stewardship end result contracting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text amends the Healthy Forests Restoration Act to ensure forest management contracts can last up to 20 years and introduces provisions that require 10% of the contract value to be paid to contractors if long-term contracts are canceled. A long-term contract is defined as one lasting more than 5 years.
113. Intra-agency strike teams Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes intra-agency strike teams to help with reviewing various environmental and historic regulations, preparing sites for fireshed management projects, and carrying out these projects. These teams can be made up of federal employees, private contractors, and volunteers, and the authority for these teams will end seven years after the law is enacted.
114. Locally-led restoration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the National Forest Management Act of 1976 increases the threshold amount from $10,000 to $55,000 and further adjusts this amount annually for changes in the Consumer Price Index starting in 2025. Additionally, it mandates the Secretary to seek bids for fireshed management projects 30 days after the law is enacted.
Money References
- (a) Threshold adjustment.—Section 14(d) of the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 472a(d)) is amended by— (1) striking “$10,000” and inserting “$55,000”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “Beginning on January 1, 2025, and annually thereafter, the amount in the first sentence of this subsection shall be adjusted by the Secretary for changes in the Consumer Price Index of All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor.”. (b) Fireshed management projects.—Beginning on the date that is 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall solicit bids under section 14 of the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (16 U.S.C. 472a(d)) for fireshed management projects under section 106. ---
115. Joint Chiefs landscape restoration partnership program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Joint Chiefs landscape restoration partnership program in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act has been revised to include additional goals such as recovery from wildfires and enhancement of natural resources. It also updates certain priorities and reporting timelines, extending requirements through 2028 for some provisions.
116. Collaborative forest landscape restoration program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section updates the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program under the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 by making amendments that include the use of innovative strategies, addressing monitoring questions, supporting collaborative processes, and expanding geographical and ecological considerations for forest management. It also extends the program's authorization through 2029.
117. Utilizing grazing for wildfire risk reduction Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Agriculture, through the Forest Service, is tasked with creating a plan to use livestock grazing to help reduce wildfire risks. This includes allowing grazing on more land during emergencies, targeting specific areas for grazing, using temporary permits to manage plant growth, using grazing to help land recover after fires, and applying all relevant legal powers.
118. Program to support priority reforestation and restoration projects of Department of the Interior Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Program to Support Priority Reforestation and Restoration Projects of the Department of the Interior is a plan that requires the Secretary of the Interior, along with other federal agency leaders, to identify and support important reforestation and restoration projects on lands affected by unexpected events like wildfires. This involves creating cooperative agreements, consulting with tribes and local governments, and submitting yearly reports to Congress, and it will expire seven years after the law is enacted.
121. Commonsense litigation reform Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A bill section outlines rules for courts regarding agency actions related to fireshed management projects. It restricts court interventions unless there is a significant environmental risk and limits judicial reviews to certain conditions, while also setting time frames for filing claims and defining relevant terms like "agency document" and "covered agency action."
122. Consultation on forest plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed changes to the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act state that no additional consultations are needed when new species are listed or critical habitats are designated, or when new information highlights effects on such species or habitats, as long as these occur after a land or forest management plan has been approved, amended, or revised. This means that ongoing plans do not have to be reviewed each time new species or critical habitats are recognized unless they impact the plan in ways not previously considered.
201. Community wildfire risk reduction program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Community Wildfire Risk Reduction Program is established by the Secretaries to help reduce wildfire risks and damage in communities, especially those in wildland-urban areas. The program will involve multiple federal agencies, support research and community partnerships for fire resistance, and provide simplified, unified grant application processes, with a planned termination after seven years.
202. Community wildfire defense research program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Community Wildfire Defense Research Program, established under this bill, is an initiative led by the Secretaries to enhance the fire-resistance of buildings and communities through innovative designs and materials. It includes a competition to encourage new ideas, promotes collaboration with the Department of Energy, and will terminate seven years after the law is enacted.
203. Vegetation management, facility inspection, and operation and maintenance relating to electric transmission and distribution facility rights-of-way Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Federal Land Policy and Management Act by expanding the distance within which hazard trees must be managed near power lines to 150 feet, requiring consultation with private landowners about tree removal, and establishing a timeline for the plan review process, including automatic approval procedures and detailed correspondence for plans needing modifications.
204. Categorical exclusion for electric utility lines rights-of-way Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section establishes a categorical exclusion for certain forest management activities related to electric utility line rights-of-way, exempting them from environmental assessments unless they occur in protected wilderness areas or places where vegetation removal is prohibited by Congress. It also specifies that permanent roads cannot be built, though existing roads can be maintained, and temporary roads must be removed within three years.
205. Seeds of success Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The "Seeds of Success strategy" is a plan, to be developed within two years, aimed at boosting the domestic supply of seeds by enhancing interagency coordination, promoting the use of native plants after wildfires, creating partnerships for plant restoration, expanding seed storage, and improving permit processes. This strategy requires collaboration between the Secretaries and the Secretary of Defense, and they must report progress to the relevant Congressional Committees.
301. Biochar innovations and opportunities for conservation, health, and advancements in research Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill outlines a program for developing and commercializing biochar, a type of carbonized biomass. It sets rules for demonstration projects, provides funding for research, and aims to promote the use of biochar for environmental benefits and job creation, particularly in rural areas. The program will involve partnerships and grants, with activities taking place across various regions and focusing on innovations in biochar applications.
302. Accurate hazardous fuels reduction reports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that starting the fiscal year after the act is enacted, the Secretary concerned must report to Congress on hazardous fuels reduction activities on federal lands. The report should detail the acres treated, wildfire risk levels, effectiveness of activities, and other specifics, while ensuring accuracy through standardized data collection procedures. Additionally, a GAO study will review the implementation of these reporting requirements, and no extra funds are authorized for these activities.
303. Public-private wildfire technology deployment and demonstration partnership Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, a pilot program is established for testing and demonstrating new technologies to prevent, detect, communicate, and mitigate wildfires. The program involves collaboration between federal agencies and various covered entities, such as private companies and educational institutions, with a focus on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and augmented reality, and will last for 7 years.
304. GAO study on Forest Service policies Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that the Comptroller General of the United States has 3 years from the enactment of the Act to conduct a study on the Forest Service. This study will evaluate the Forest Service's wildland firefighting effectiveness, budget transparency, and the idea of creating a new federal agency for handling wildland fires. A report of the study's findings must then be submitted to Congress.
305. Forest Service Western headquarters study Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Chief of the Forest Service is required to conduct a study within 5 years to evaluate locations for a new Western headquarters, considering options in at least three states west of the Mississippi River. The study will examine the benefits of this new headquarters, such as better customer service, improved employee recruitment and retention, and operational efficiency. A report on the findings must then be submitted to Congress.
306. Keeping forest plans current and monitored Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines duties for the Secretary to ensure forest plans are up-to-date and shared publicly, emphasizing compliance with legal requirements, prioritizing revisions for outdated plans, and establishing a central website for forest plans and reports. Additionally, if the Secretary fails to act quickly and honestly on these tasks due to insufficient funding, these directives become invalid for the affected plans, and a court can expedite plan completion.
307. Container Aerial Firefighting System (CAFFS) Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to evaluate and report on the use of container aerial firefighting systems for combating wildfires, with input from national aviation committees. The findings must be submitted to specific congressional committees within a specified timeframe.
308. Study on pine beetle infestation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates the Secretary of Agriculture, via the Forest Service Chief, to conduct a study on the pine beetle infestation in the northeastern U.S. within one year of the Act's enactment and to present a report on the findings to relevant Congressional Committees.
401. Wildland Fire Management Casualty Assistance Program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Wildland Fire Management Casualty Assistance Program aims to support the families of firefighters and wildland fire support personnel who are injured or killed in the line of duty. The program includes notification and financial assistance for travel expenses, management procedures for effective case handling, and collaboration with various government agencies to ensure survivors receive necessary benefits and support.
501. White Oak Restoration Initiative Coalition Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The White Oak Restoration Initiative Coalition is established as a voluntary group involving various governmental and non-governmental entities to enhance the health and growth of white oak trees in the U.S. It aims to improve collaboration, make policy recommendations, and support research and outreach efforts for white oak restoration, with administrative support and potential funding provided by the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture.
502. Forest Service pilot program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes a program where the Secretary of Agriculture will start five pilot projects in national forests to restore white oak trees. At least three of these projects must take place in forests that are reserved from the public domain, and the program will end seven years after the law is enacted.
503. Department of the Interior white oak review and restoration Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of the Interior is tasked with checking land managed by the Department of the Interior, like wildlife refuges, to see if white oak trees are there and if it's possible to restore them. After reporting the findings to Congress, they will start five projects to help white oak trees grow again, with the option to work with other groups on these projects. This work, including all related authority, will end seven years after the law is enacted.
504. White oak regeneration and upland oak habitat Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The "White Oak and Upland Oak Habitat Regeneration Program" is established by the Secretary of Agriculture to improve and regenerate white oak forests across the United States through scientific and collaborative efforts with various agencies and organizations. The program includes initiatives like grants and technical assistance for restoration activities and is set to operate for 7 years from the enactment of the Act.
505. Tree nursery shortages Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of Agriculture to create a plan within one year to increase the capacity of tree nurseries across the country to address seedling shortages. The plan should be scientifically based and focus on solving regional seedling shortages, supporting reforestation efforts, enhancing seedling diversity, and overcoming obstacles to nursery expansion.
506. White oak research Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to collaborate with Tribes or institutions, including specific land grant colleges, to research various aspects of white oak trees, such as genetic diversity and reforestation techniques. This authority will expire 7 years after the bill's enactment, and allows for consultation with various entities to enhance the research.
507. USDA formal initiative Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Agriculture, through the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Forest Service, will start a program focused on white oak trees to help re-establish forests, improve current ones, assist private landowners, enhance nursery stock, and adapt seedlings. This initiative will last for 7 years after the law is enacted.
508. Authorities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section describes how the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture can use their powers under this law, along with other laws, to complete projects. These projects could include partnerships called "good neighbor agreements" and "stewardship contracting projects" under specific Acts.
601. Water source protection program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Water Source Protection Program section of the bill amends existing law to detail how non-federal, state, local, and private lands can be involved in water and forest health projects. It explains the priorities and requirements for these projects, the need for collaboration with non-federal partners, and guidelines for creating water source management plans that use the best scientific information to enhance ecological integrity.
602. Watershed condition framework technical corrections Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 304(a) of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 removes the words "protection and" from paragraphs (3) and (5), altering how the legislation addresses certain aspects of watershed condition management.