Overview
Title
To require each agency to evaluate the permitting system of the agency, to consider whether a permit by rule could replace that system, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The FREE Act is a plan to make getting permits from the government quicker and easier by allowing them to be automatically approved if people promise to follow certain rules. Agencies must look at their current systems to see if they can use this new faster way, and they still get to check if people are actually following the rules.
Summary AI
H.R. 8784, known as the "Full Responsibility and Expedited Enforcement Act" or the "FREE Act," aims to streamline the permitting process within federal agencies by introducing a "permit by rule" system. This system would allow permits to be automatically approved within 30 days if applicants certify compliance with specific written standards, reducing delays and costs. Agencies must evaluate their existing permitting systems, report their findings to Congress, and transition to the new system where feasible, while retaining the right to audit and enforce compliance. The bill also outlines measures for maintaining previous systems if they provide unique value and sets guidelines for agency oversight and applicant appeals.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
House Bill 8784, also known as the "Full Responsibility and Expedited Enforcement Act" or the "FREE Act," aims to overhaul the permitting processes used by federal agencies. The bill mandates that each agency assess its current permitting system and consider replacing it with a "permit by rule" system. This new approach is anticipated to streamline the permitting process, creating clear standards for application and imposing a 30-day approval timeframe. The bill emphasizes reducing delays and costs for both the government and applicants, with agencies maintaining the authority to audit compliance and enforce standards post-approval.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several significant issues:
Timelines and Reporting: The bill requires agency heads to submit a comprehensive report to Congress within 240 days. This timeline may be tight for larger agencies with more intricate permitting systems, potentially leading to rushed evaluations.
Automatic Approval Risks: The provision for automatic permit approval after 30 days, absent any action by the agency, raises concerns about inadequate review of applications, which could result in permits being issued to non-compliant entities.
Burden of Proof in Appeals: During appeals, the burden of proof rests with the agency. If many appeals arise, this could overwhelm agencies, especially those with limited resources.
Lack of Clear Guidelines: Terms such as "reasonable interpretation" and "good faith effort," central to the approval and appeals process, remain vaguely defined, possibly leading to disputes or inconsistencies.
Concurrent Systems Complexity: The option for agencies to maintain both traditional and new permitting systems could create administrative challenges and additional costs.
Broad Impact on the Public
The bill's proposal for a "permit by rule" system could have a widespread impact by significantly reducing the time required for permit approvals. This efficiency could lead to faster project starts in areas relying on federal permits, such as infrastructure, energy, and construction. For the general public, these changes might translate to quicker completion of public projects and developments, potentially spurring economic growth and improving services.
However, the introduction of automatic approvals may increase risks if applications bypass thorough reviews, which could lead to environmentally or socially harmful activities proceeding without necessary oversight. The public might also face uncertainty if agencies struggle to recalibrate operations under new rules while simultaneously maintaining accountability standards.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Government Agencies: Agencies might face challenges in transitioning to the new system, especially in managing the dual process of traditional and new permit schemes. Additionally, financial strains could emerge from increased appeals, where they bear proof burdens and potential attorney fees.
Businesses and Applicants: Businesses applying for permits could benefit significantly from reduced wait times and clearer application criteria, improving operational planning and reducing costs related to permit acquisition. However, they may also face new compliance and certification requirements under the "permit by rule" system, potentially increasing initial application responsibilities.
Environmental and Community Organizations: These stakeholders may express concerns about the potential weakening of oversight in permit approvals, especially if compliance checks occur post-approval. The changes could be seen as prioritizing business speed over thorough environmental and community impact assessments.
In conclusion, while the FREE Act offers potentially beneficial reforms to the federal permitting process, careful considerations and safeguards must be put in place to balance efficiency with responsible oversight and environmental protection.
Issues
The timeline for agency heads to submit a comprehensive report to Congress (240 days) may be insufficient for all agencies depending on their size and the complexity of their permitting processes as specified in Section 3(a).
Automatic approval of permits after 30 days if no action is taken could lead to potential risks if agencies are unable to adequately review applications within that timeframe, as addressed in Section 3(b).
The clause stipulating that the burden of proof rests on the agency during appeals could potentially overwhelm agencies with limited resources, especially if many appeals are filed, as discussed in Section 3(b)(3)(E).
There is no explicit mention of the measures or guidelines that would prevent an agency from stalling or discouraging the permit issuance using their discretion, which is an issue identified in Section 2.
The language regarding 'reasonable interpretation of substantive standards' and 'good faith effort to comply' could be subjective and lead to disputes, requiring clearer definitions or guidelines, as noted in Section 3(b)(3)(D).
Concurrent use of both old and new permitting systems could lead to administrative complexity and additional costs for agencies, as mentioned in Section 3(f).
The requirement to issue permits by rule prior to having fully transitioned and assessed their effectiveness may lead to premature implementation issues, outlined in Section 3(c).
The section does not specify what constitutes 'value' that the previous permitting system may offer over a permit by rule, leading to subjective determinations, as noted in Section 3(f)(1).
The restriction on agency settlement agreements could limit agencies' flexibility in unique cases where settlement might be beneficial for all parties, as discussed in Section 3(d).
The definition of 'compelling interest' is vague and could be interpreted differently, potentially leading to inconsistent application across cases, identified in Section 2(4).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the Act gives it two possible titles: the “Full Responsibility and Expedited Enforcement Act” or the “FREE Act”.
2. Findings Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Congress finds that the current permitting system allows too much discretion and lacks time constraints, creating delays and high costs. To address this, they propose a "permit by rule" process that sets clear standards, requires applicants to certify compliance, and mandates a streamlined 30-day approval period, allowing the Government to focus on auditing compliance rather than delaying permits.
3. Permit by rule Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a new system called "permit by rule," requiring each agency to report to Congress and potentially replace their current permit systems. This process aims to simplify approval by automatically granting permits if applications meet specific standards, with mechanisms for audit, enforcement, and appeals included for oversight and fairness.