Overview

Title

To direct the Secretary of Commerce to establish a grant program to support State data infrastructure projects, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The bill wants to give states money to help them improve how they use and keep their important information safe. They will get between $1,500,000 and $5,000,000 each, with all the money for everyone adding up to a big $41,000,000 every year for five years.

Summary AI

H.R. 8751, titled the “Improving Government Data-Driven Decisions Act,” proposes the establishment of a grant program by the Secretary of Commerce to support State data infrastructure projects. The bill aims to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of State programs by improving centralized data sharing, security, and technology systems. Grants ranging from $1,500,000 to $5,000,000 would be available to State governments to support these initiatives, with a total authorization of $41,000,000 per year from 2024 to 2028. The bill emphasizes the protection of individual privacy in compliance with State and Federal laws.

Published

2024-06-14
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-06-14
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8751ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
561
Pages:
3
Sentences:
17

Language

Nouns: 184
Verbs: 43
Adjectives: 23
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 19
Entities: 37

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.58
Average Sentence Length:
33.00
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
19.99

AnalysisAI

The bill known as the “Improving Government Data-Driven Decisions Act” has been introduced in the United States House of Representatives to establish a grant program led by the Secretary of Commerce. This program is intended to bolster state data infrastructure projects. The proposed grant program aims to enhance centralized data sharing, improve data security, and ensure the effective administration of state programs and services. Under this initiative, grants ranging from $1.5 million to $5 million would be provided to state governments. To support this effort, $41 million per year has been authorized for the fiscal years 2024 through 2028.

Significant Issues with the Bill

One of the main challenges within the bill is its broad definition of "data infrastructure," which includes both technical and human elements. Without clear differentiation, this could lead to varying interpretations and implementation practices across different states. The goals outlined for the program are also quite general, which might make it difficult to measure success and ensure accountability.

Furthermore, the criteria specifying the range of grant amounts lack clarity. The bill does not provide a solid framework for determining precisely how much funding each project should receive within the specified range. This could lead to perceptions of bias or unfairness in how funds are allocated. Additionally, the application requirements are vague, offering minimal guidance to states on how to prepare and submit their grant applications, potentially resulting in inconsistencies in evaluation and approval processes.

The section on appropriations lacks details on fund management, allocation, and handling of unspent balances. This absence of specificity may contribute to budgeting issues or inefficient use of the allocated funds.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the successful implementation of this bill could significantly enhance the capability and efficiency of state programs and services. Improved data infrastructure might facilitate better decision-making, thus benefitting the general public through more effective resource allocation and service delivery.

However, the ambiguity in the bill’s language and criteria could negatively impact state governments attempting to secure and utilize the grants. States might face challenges in understanding application requirements or demonstrating compliance with broadly defined objectives, which could hinder effective participation in the program.

For state agencies specifically responsible for data infrastructure, an increased focus on enhancing capabilities such as data management and security would likely constitute a significant positive impact. These agencies could leverage grant funds to innovate and upgrade their systems, hence contributing to more robust state data ecosystems. Conversely, inefficiencies in fund distribution or allocation might lead to disparities among states, especially those with less experience or resources to navigate a potentially complex application process.

In conclusion, while the bill possesses the potential to drive substantial improvements in state-level data infrastructure, stakeholders must address its inherent vagueness and develop clearer guidelines to maximize its intended benefits.

Financial Assessment

The bill, identified as H.R. 8751 or the "Improving Government Data-Driven Decisions Act," outlines financial provisions aimed at enhancing data infrastructure for state governments. This commentary addresses the financial aspects as described in the bill, focusing on grant allocations and issues related to funding.

Financial Allocations

The bill authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to create a grant program specifically for supporting state-level data infrastructure projects. Under this program, each grant awarded must fall between $1,500,000 and $5,000,000. This range is established to ensure that each funded project has sufficient financial resources to significantly impact state data systems.

Additionally, the bill authorizes an annual appropriation of $41,000,000 for each fiscal year from 2024 through 2028. This appropriation is intended to cover the total cost of the grant program, providing financial support for multiple projects across different states over a five-year period.

Issues Related to Financial Allocations

Several issues have been identified related to the financial elements of the bill:

  1. Range of Grant Amounts: While the bill specifies a grant size range from $1,500,000 to $5,000,000, it lacks criteria for determining specific allocations within this range. This absence of guidance could result in perceptions of unfairness or inconsistency in how funds are distributed among competing states. Without transparent criteria, states may feel that the distribution is arbitrary.

  2. Management of Appropriations: The annual appropriation of $41,000,000 is substantial, yet the bill does not specify how these funds will be allocated or managed across various states and projects. Furthermore, there is no guidance on handling unspent funds, which could lead to budgeting inefficiencies. States and administrators may require additional clarity to ensure funds are used effectively and in a manner that delivers measurable improvements in data infrastructure.

  3. Vague Application Requirements: Section 2(d) describes application requirements in broad terms, which may lead to inconsistencies in the applications submitted by states. Inconsistent applications could further complicate fair distribution of the fixed grant range and annual appropriations, affecting the overall effectiveness of the program.

By addressing these issues, the bill could enhance clarity, fairness, and efficiency in the allocation and use of financial resources dedicated to improving state data infrastructures. As it stands, the bill outlines significant financial commitments, but requires additional detail to maximize the impact of these funds and ensure equitable access and outcomes for all participating states.

Issues

  • The definition of 'data infrastructure' in Section 2(f) combines both technical and human elements without clear differentiation, which could lead to varied interpretations and implementation challenges across different State projects.

  • The language regarding the goals and definitions of the 'data infrastructure' in Section 2(b) is broad and may result in difficulties in measuring success or ensuring accountability for the grant program.

  • Section 2(d) contains vague application requirements ('such form, at such time, and containing such information as the Secretary determines appropriate'), offering little concrete guidance to applicants which could lead to inconsistencies in applications received and possibly unfair selection processes.

  • Section 2(e) specifies a grant size range ($1,500,000 to $5,000,000) without concrete criteria for determining the allocation within this range, risking perceptions of inconsistent or unfair distribution of funds.

  • Section 2(g), regarding the authorization of appropriations, lacks specificity about how the $41,000,000 annual funds will be allocated, managed, or how unspent balances would be handled, which may lead to budgeting issues or inefficient use of funds.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill provides its short title, which is the “Improving Government Data-Driven Decisions Act.”

2. Data infrastructure grant program Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a grant program established by the Secretary of Commerce to improve data infrastructure for state governments. It aims to enhance data security, efficiency, and privacy in state programs, with grants ranging from $1.5 million to $5 million, and allocates $41 million per year from 2024 to 2028 for this purpose.

Money References

  • — (1) MINIMUM.—The minimum amount of a grant under the Program shall be $1,500,000.
  • (2) MAXIMUM.—The maximum amount of a grant under the Program shall be $5,000,000.
  • (g) Authorization of appropriations.—There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the Program $41,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028.