Overview
Title
To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot program to develop a training program that teaches members of the Armed Forces to interact with digital information in a safe and responsible manner, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 8746 is a plan to teach people in the military how to be smart and safe when reading information online, so they can tell what's true and what's not. They will try different ways to learn, like on the computer or in person, and share what they think works best.
Summary AI
H.R. 8746, also known as the “SHIELD Act of 2024,” proposes the creation of a pilot program by the Secretary of Defense aimed at teaching members of the Armed Forces how to safely and responsibly interact with digital information. Within 120 days of the Act's enactment, the program will focus on identifying reliable journalism, recognizing disinformation, and avoiding information-based threats. It will utilize a variety of training methods—such as in-person, virtual, and hybrid approaches—and include a diverse range of participants to gather feedback. The program's authority will end one year after it begins, and a report with evaluations and recommendations will be submitted to the Armed Services Committees of Congress 180 days after the program's conclusion.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
Summary of the Bill
The proposed legislation, known as the "Strategic Homeland Information Education and Learning Defense Act of 2024" or the "SHIELD Act of 2024," aims to enhance digital literacy among members of the U.S. Armed Forces. The legislation mandates the Secretary of Defense to establish a pilot training program within 120 days of the bill's enactment. This program is designed to educate service members on how to safely and responsibly engage with digital information. The curriculum will cover identifying credible sources, evaluating the credibility of digital content, protecting personal data, and recognizing digital threats. Moreover, it emphasizes addressing potential insider threats related to conspiracy theories and hate-based ideologies. The program lasts for a year and will employ a mix of in-person, virtual, and hybrid training methods. Following its completion, participants and instructors will provide feedback through surveys, and a report will be submitted to Congress evaluating the program's effectiveness and providing recommendations for the future.
Significant Issues
A notable concern with the bill is the absence of a specific budget or funding allocation for the pilot program. This omission might lead to uncontrolled expenses or insufficient financial oversight. Another issue is the lack of a provision within the bill for the continuation of the program if it proves to be successful, which could stall its progress unless further legislative action is taken. Additionally, while the bill suggests the Secretary of Defense may consult with external experts, this is not mandated, potentially resulting in a program that lacks comprehensive expert input. The participant selection process lacks clear criteria and may not accurately represent the diversity necessary for meaningful feedback. The required uniform use of in-person, virtual, and hybrid delivery methods may not be the most effective approach, given potential logistical challenges or differences in delivery efficacy. Lastly, the bill could benefit from clearer guidelines on defining meaningful feedback to ensure robust evaluation of the program's outcomes.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill's emphasis on improving digital literacy among service members could have far-reaching benefits. By equipping the Armed Forces with the skills to assess and interact with digital information critically, the program aims to safeguard not only individual privacy and security but also national security interests. A more digitally literate military could reduce susceptibility to misinformation, propaganda, and cyber threats, which is increasingly vital in modern warfare and public communication.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For the Armed Forces, the pilot program represents an opportunity to enhance the digital skills and critical thinking capabilities of its members. However, the logistics of implementing various training methods might challenge the military's current educational infrastructure. Educational institutions and experts specializing in digital literacy stand to gain from potential collaboration with the Department of Defense, although the non-mandatory nature of consultation could limit this involvement. Additionally, should the compulsory educational initiatives expand beyond the pilot stage, broader service member participation could affect military schedules and operations, requiring careful integration.
In conclusion, while the SHIELD Act of 2024 presents an innovative approach to enhancing digital literacy within the Armed Forces, its successful implementation hinges on addressing the issues related to budget, expert consultation, and robust evaluation mechanisms.
Issues
The bill, particularly in Section 2, lacks a specific budget or funding allocation for the pilot program, which may lead to unforeseen expenses or a lack of financial oversight. This could become a significant issue if costs escalate without proper legislative control.
The termination clause in Section 2(c) lacks a provision for continuation if the program is deemed successful. This could necessitate further legislative action to extend or formalize the program, potentially interrupting its progress and implementation.
In Section 2(d), the optional nature of consultation ('may consult') might result in a lack of external expert involvement, leading to inadequately informed program development. This could be particularly important given the complexity of digital information literacy.
The selection criteria for participants in Section 2(b)(2) are not clearly defined beyond being geographically and demographically diverse. This could lead to arbitrary selection, lack of representativeness, and could undermine the validity of the program's feedback and outcomes.
The requirement in Section 2(b)(3) to use equal amounts of in-person, virtual, and hybrid training delivery methods may not consider the varying effectiveness or logistical challenges associated with each method. This could affect the program's overall efficacy and participant outcomes.
The language in Section 2(b) could be more specific about what constitutes meaningful feedback as a metric for participant selection and program evaluation, potentially leading to subjective evaluations and conclusions.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill states that the official title of the legislation is “The Strategic Homeland Information Education and Learning Defense Act of 2024,” which can also be referred to as the “SHIELD Act of 2024.”
2. Pilot program for digital information training for members of the Armed Forces Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill instructs the Secretary of Defense to set up a one-year pilot training program for Armed Forces members, teaching them how to interact safely with digital information. It involves developing a curriculum on identifying reliable information, protecting personal data, and addressing insider threats, and requires a diverse sample of participants to provide feedback on both the content and delivery methods—such as in-person, virtual, and hybrid. After the program, a report is to be submitted, assessing the effectiveness of different training methods and offering recommendations for any future, permanent program.