Overview

Title

To direct the Secretary of Labor to issue nonmandatory guidance on reducing the threat of violence in the workplace, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

The Safe Workplaces Act is like a plan for making workplaces safer. It asks a group of worker safety experts to come up with ideas on how to stop violence at places like stores and schools, which will help workers stay safe, but using these ideas is like having a helpful suggestion, not a must-do rule.

Summary AI

H.R. 8669, known as the "Safe Workplaces Act," directs the Secretary of Labor to create guidelines to help reduce violence in the workplace. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health will first conduct a study to identify ways to reduce such threats, and a report with recommendations will be submitted. Based on this report, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will issue nonmandatory guidance tailored for different types of workplaces, such as stores, hospitals, and schools. This bill includes definitions of key terms related to workplace threats and recommendations for safety measures like engineering controls and training programs.

Published

2024-06-07
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-06-07
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8669ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,168
Pages:
6
Sentences:
31

Language

Nouns: 387
Verbs: 90
Adjectives: 58
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 17
Entities: 29

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.46
Average Sentence Length:
37.68
Token Entropy:
5.10
Readability (ARI):
21.88

AnalysisAI

The proposed bill, titled the "Safe Workplaces Act," aims to address the issue of workplace violence through nonmandatory guidelines developed by the Secretary of Labor. The bill outlines a process whereby the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) will conduct a comprehensive study on the matter. This study's findings will be submitted in a report after 15 months, which will guide the eventual issuance of recommendations for reducing workplace violence by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). These guidelines would consider the unique risks present in various types of workplaces, such as grocery stores, hospitals, and schools, focusing on engineering controls, dangerous weapons, and environmental risk factors.

Significant Issues

A primary concern associated with this proposed legislation is the timeline for its implementation. The period extending from the study's commencement to the issuance of the guidance spans over four years. Some may argue that given the urgency of addressing workplace violence, waiting such an extended period before implementing safety measures could prolong exposure to potential risks for workers.

Furthermore, since the guidance issued will be nonmandatory, there is the possibility that some workplaces might choose not to adopt these measures, particularly if they incur significant costs. This nonmandatory nature may result in inconsistent compliance, potentially leaving some workers less protected than others.

The extensive list of workplaces intended to be covered by the guidance may not be exhaustive, suggesting possible ambiguities about its applicability across different industries. Additionally, the definition of "workplace violence" in the bill excludes lawful acts of self-defense, which could lead to legal uncertainties and varying interpretations about what constitutes acceptable behavior under these circumstances.

Public Impact

Overall, this bill seeks to improve worker safety by providing federal guidance on reducing the threat of violence, thereby potentially enhancing wellbeing and security for many employees across various sectors. However, the nonmandatory nature of the guidelines means that there is a risk that not all workplaces will take the necessary precautions, which could undermine the potential benefits of the legislation.

Impact on Stakeholders

For employees, particularly those working in high-risk environments such as healthcare or public service, this bill could herald significant improvements in workplace safety if the guidelines are widely adopted. It could lead to peace of mind for employees, knowing there are consistent efforts to mitigate violence in the workplace.

Employers, especially those operating in traditionally high-risk sectors, may find that implementing the recommended controls could entail significant resources and costs. Businesses might be concerned about the financial implications of adopting the proposed safety measures, particularly if they are already operating on tight margins.

Policymakers and advocates for workplace safety might view this bill as a step in the right direction toward establishing a safer working environment across the United States. However, they may also feel compelled to call for more robust, mandatory measures to ensure widespread implementation and compliance.

In summary, while the "Safe Workplaces Act" seeks to advance worker safety by addressing workplace violence through nonmandatory guidance, the issues of implementation timeline, voluntary compliance, and potential legal ambiguities raise questions about its efficacy and the equity of its impact across various sectors and businesses.

Issues

  • The timeline for the study and subsequent guidance issuance could be seen as lengthy, potentially delaying necessary safety measures in workplaces. The study will take 15 months to report findings and an additional 4 years for guidance issuance (Section 2). This may be significant for workers and employers concerned about ongoing risks of violence.

  • The guidance on workplace violence reduction to be issued by OSHA is nonmandatory (Section 2(c)), which might limit its effectiveness since workplaces could choose not to implement the recommendations, particularly if they entail significant costs. This could have political implications regarding the enforcement of workplace safety.

  • The guidance applies to a wide range of workplaces but may not be exhaustive (Section 2(c)), possibly creating ambiguity about its applicability in different sectors and potentially leading to unequal safety measures across industries.

  • The definition of 'workplace violence' excludes lawful acts of self-defense (Section 2(d)(6)(B)). This exclusion could result in varying interpretations and legal challenges regarding what constitutes a lawful act, potentially creating legal ambiguities and implications for both employers and employees.

  • The definition of 'dangerous weapon' is broad and unspecified beyond stating it can inflict death or serious injury (Section 2(d)(1)). This lack of specificity could lead to challenges in determining what qualifies as a dangerous weapon, impacting how workplaces assess risks and enforce rules.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Act mentioned in the section is officially named the "Safe Workplaces Act."

2. OSHA guidance on reducing the threat of violence in the workplace Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines a study and guidance aimed at reducing workplace violence. The Director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health will conduct research and submit a report with recommendations, which will inform nonmandatory guidance issued by the Secretary of Labor, accounting for different workplaces and considering engineering controls, dangerous weapons, and environmental risk factors.