Overview

Title

To require a report by the Transportation Security Administration on digital identity ecosystems, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 8658 is a plan to have the people in charge of keeping airports safe write a report about how we use digital IDs when traveling. They want to see if these IDs are safe and if they help the U.S. stay ahead of other countries.

Summary AI

H. R. 8658, titled the "Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem Report Act of 2024," requires a report from the Transportation Security Administration on the current and future state of digital identity systems in the transportation sector. The report, due within 180 days of enactment, aims to assess these systems' security benefits, risks, and potential to enhance the U.S.'s competitive edge while incorporating insights from private sectors and various levels of government.

Published

2024-08-30
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Reported in House
Date: 2024-08-30
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8658rh

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
392
Pages:
4
Sentences:
10

Language

Nouns: 137
Verbs: 24
Adjectives: 22
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 21
Entities: 33

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.60
Average Sentence Length:
39.20
Token Entropy:
4.49
Readability (ARI):
23.37

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The "Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem Report Act of 2024," introduced in the 118th Congress, proposes that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) submit a detailed report to Congress concerning digital identity systems. This legislation mandates that the TSA Administrator compile and deliver a comprehensive analysis within 180 days following the act's enactment. The report should explore the current and evolving landscape of digital identity in the transportation sector, emphasizing the security advantages and potential risks associated with these systems. Additionally, it calls for insights from private sector entities and various government levels, including state, local, Tribal, and territorial governments.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several key issues have been identified with this bill:

  1. Timeline Constraints: The bill specifies a 180-day deadline for submitting the report, which may not allow adequate time to gather thorough data and consult with all relevant stakeholders. A rushed report could result in a lack of depth and comprehensive analysis.

  2. Undefined Terms: The legislation does not clearly define what constitutes a "digital identity ecosystem." This lack of definition could lead to inconsistent interpretations, affecting the coherence and utility of the report.

  3. Diverse Stakeholder Inclusion: The requirement to include perspectives from a wide range of stakeholders, including private sector and various government entities, poses significant logistical challenges. Ensuring diverse and representative input may delay the report and could affect its quality.

  4. Broad Language: Phrases such as "better protect homeland security and increase the competitive advantage of the United States" are open to interpretation, potentially resulting in differing opinions about the report's criteria for success.

  5. Criteria for Assessment: The absence of a clear framework for evaluating the "benefits and risks" of digital identity ecosystems might lead to inconsistent findings. Without standardized criteria, the report's recommendations risk being seen as unreliable.

Potential Impact on the Public

The bill's focus on digital identity ecosystems in the transportation sector could have substantial implications for public security and privacy. If enacted, the findings of the TSA's report may influence future legislative or regulatory actions aimed at enhancing security measures. The public could benefit from improved security protocols, but there might also be concerns about privacy and data management related to the implementation of new digital systems.

Impact on Stakeholders

  • General Public: The general public is likely to be affected indirectly through changes in transportation security procedures following the report's findings. Enhanced digital identity systems could streamline travel and improve security, although there may be concerns about data privacy and the integrity of digital identities.

  • Private Sector: The private sector, particularly companies involved in digital identity technology and transportation services, may experience increased demand for innovation and collaboration with government entities. However, they could also face regulatory challenges and pressure to comply with new standards.

  • Government Entities: Various levels of government, including state, local, Tribal, and territorial, would need to coordinate with the federal government and the TSA to provide input for the report. This collaboration could foster stronger relationships but may also require substantial resources and time commitments.

In summary, while the bill seeks to address the evolving landscape of digital identity systems with potential benefits for national security and competitive advantage, it poses challenges in terms of timing, stakeholder engagement, and definitional clarity. These factors could affect the overall effectiveness and impact of the proposed legislation.

Issues

  • The timeline for the report submission, being 'not later than 180 days after enactment,' might not be sufficient for gathering comprehensive data and perspectives from all stakeholders involved, leading to an incomplete analysis. This could significantly impact the quality and usefulness of the report's findings. (Section 2)

  • The section does not clearly define what constitutes a 'digital identity ecosystem,' which may lead to varied interpretations and potential inconsistencies in the report. This lack of definition could create confusion and undermine the intended objectives of the legislation. (Section 2)

  • The requirement to include perspectives from the private sector and State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments might be challenging given the broad and diverse range of stakeholders. This complexity could delay the report or result in a lack of comprehensiveness, affecting the report's effectiveness in guiding policy. (Section 2)

  • The phrase 'better protect homeland security and increase the competitive advantage of the United States' is broad and could be interpreted in multiple ways, potentially leading to differing opinions on the report's success criteria. This ambiguity might result in disagreements about the report's conclusions and recommendations. (Section 2)

  • Without clear criteria for assessing 'benefits and risks' of digital identity ecosystems, the report may lack a standardized evaluation framework, affecting the consistency and reliability of findings. This could make it difficult for policymakers to assess the validity of the report's recommendations. (Section 2)

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that the official name of the act is the “Emerging Digital Identity Ecosystem Report Act of 2024.”

2. TSA report on digital identity ecosystems Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section mandates that the TSA Administrator must deliver a report to Congress within 180 days of the law's enactment. This report should discuss the current and emerging digital identity systems within the transportation sector, highlighting their security benefits and risks, and should consider input from various government levels and the private sector.