Overview

Title

To award a Congressional gold medal to Major Thomas D. Howie, in recognition of his bravery and outstanding service during the Battle of Normandy.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 8653 is a proposal to give a special gold medal to honor Major Thomas D. Howie for being very brave during a big battle in World War II. They want to make some extra medals too that people can buy, and the money from those sales will help a US government fund.

Summary AI

H. R. 8653 proposes to award a Congressional gold medal posthumously to Major Thomas D. Howie. The bill acknowledges his bravery and outstanding service during the Battle of Normandy, outlining his significant contributions and sacrifices, including being the first American to enter St. Lo after his death. It allows the creation of a gold medal to be presented to his family or displayed at The Citadel Museum, and authorizes the production of duplicate medals for sale. Additionally, it specifies that the proceeds from the sale of these duplicates will support the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

Published

2024-06-07
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-06-07
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8653ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
6
Words:
1,326
Pages:
7
Sentences:
52

Language

Nouns: 503
Verbs: 96
Adjectives: 50
Adverbs: 14
Numbers: 37
Entities: 140

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.23
Average Sentence Length:
25.50
Token Entropy:
5.26
Readability (ARI):
14.83

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

House Bill H.R. 8653 is a legislative proposal designed to honor Major Thomas D. Howie posthumously by awarding him a Congressional gold medal. This recognition is in acknowledgment of his bravery and exceptional service during the Battle of Normandy in World War II. The bill outlines the specific details about Major Howie's military achievements, his lasting impact on American values, and the proposed process for designing and presenting the medal. It also discusses the provision for creating duplicate medals to be sold as bronze replicas, with the proceeds directed to the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several important issues arise from this bill. First, the posthumous nature of the award raises ethical questions about the timing and necessity for honoring individuals who cannot personally benefit from the accolade. Additionally, the lack of clarity regarding the process for determining the recipient of the award, specifically concerning the availability of Major Howie's nephew or other next of kin, may lead to disputes.

Further concerns are tied to financial elements of the bill. The allocation of funds from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund lacks specific caps, presenting a risk of unbounded spending. Similarly, the language permitting the sale of bronze duplicate medals is vague, potentially allowing for favoritism or conflicts of interest in the sales process.

Broad Public Impact

The broader impact of the bill involves the reinforcement of American military values and honoring historical figures who symbolize courage and patriotism. By celebrating Major Howie's contributions, the bill seeks to inspire future generations and foster a continued sense of national pride and military valor. However, it is also essential to consider the financial implications. Unchecked spending from public funds could influence public opinion on fiscal responsibility and the prioritization of governmental initiatives.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Major Howie's family and descendants, this bill offers a significant acknowledgment of their relative's heroism. The emotional and symbolic value of such an award can serve as a source of pride and honor for the family, despite the potential logistical issues around who specifically receives the medal.

The Citadel Museum stands to gain from the bill, as the required display of the medal there can attract attention and potentially increase visitors or interest in military history and Major Howie's legacy. However, choosing The Citadel Museum over other institutions could be perceived as favoritism, raising questions about why this particular location was selected.

On the financial side, the United States Mint is directly impacted by its involvement in creating and selling these medals. Costs associated with striking and managing these items must be balanced against the revenue from sales, highlighting the need for financial accountability and transparency within the Mint's operations.

In conclusion, while the bill aims to honor a war hero and bolster national pride, it presents several challenges, particularly regarding financial management and clarity in execution, which should be considered to ensure the intended positive impact is realized without unintended negative consequences.

Issues

  • Section 6: The authorization to use fund amounts from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund lacks specified limits or caps on spending, which could lead to unbounded financial liabilities and raise concerns about potential wasteful expenditures.

  • Section 3: The bill's provision for awarding the Congressional gold medal posthumously to Major Thomas D. Howie may raise ethical questions about the necessity and timing of such an honor when the recipient cannot personally benefit or gain recognition from it directly.

  • Section 4: The lack of specification regarding who the authorized buyers of duplicate medals are and any limitations on sales may lead to potential favoritism or conflicts of interest.

  • Section 6: There is a lack of clarity on the total cost associated with striking the medals and what considerations are included in these costs, which could impact financial accountability and transparency.

  • Section 5: The classification of the medals as 'national medals' and as 'numismatic items' may require further explanation to prevent misunderstandings and ensure all stakeholders understand the significance and implications of these legal designations.

  • Section 3: The requirement to display the medal at The Citadel Museum might be seen as favoritism towards this particular institution without providing a clear rationale, potentially leading to perceptions of bias.

  • Section 3: The bill does not clearly define 'next of kin' nor specify who decides on Tom Howie's availability, potentially leading to disputes or ambiguity regarding who should receive the medal.

  • Section 4: The vague language 'at a price sufficient to cover the costs' related to the sale of duplicate medals might result in ambiguous pricing and cost estimation, complicating financial oversight.

  • Section 3: The section lacks specific oversight or accountability measures for the production and distribution of medals, which could lead to inefficient use of resources and potential wastage.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that the official name for the legislation is the "Major Thomas D. Howie Congressional Gold Medal".

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress highlights the heroic and inspiring legacy of Major Thomas D. Howie, detailing his extraordinary acts of bravery during World War II, his posthumous honors, and his influence on popular culture and memorials, emphasizing his enduring impact on American values and history.

3. Congressional gold medal Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section authorizes Congress to award a posthumous Congressional gold medal to Major Thomas D. Howie for his bravery during the Battle of Normandy. The medal will be designed by the Secretary of the Treasury and given to either his nephew Tom Howie or the next of kin, and afterwards displayed at The Citadel Museum.

4. Duplicate medals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is allowed to create and sell bronze copies of a gold medal mentioned in a different section. These sales should be at a price that covers all production costs, including materials, labor, and other expenses.

5. Status of medals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The medals created under this Act are recognized as national medals according to U.S. law, and they are also categorized as collectible items for legal purposes related to coins and currency.

6. Authority to use fund amounts; proceeds of sale Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section gives permission to use money from the United States Mint Public Enterprise Fund to cover the costs of making medals. Additionally, any money earned from selling duplicate bronze medals will go back into the same fund.