Overview
Title
To prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from procuring certain foreign-made batteries, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 8631 is a rule that says a group in charge of keeping people safe, called Homeland Security, can't buy certain batteries made by some foreign companies that might not be trustworthy. This rule starts in 2027, but if they really need those batteries and can't find others, they might still use them with special permission.
Summary AI
H.R. 8631, titled the "Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act," aims to stop the Department of Homeland Security from buying batteries made by certain foreign companies known for potential security risks, starting October 1, 2027. The bill lists specific companies that supply batteries and might be linked to Chinese military interests or forced labor. If no other comparable batteries are available or if they are for research purposes, exceptions may be granted. The bill also requires the Homeland Security Secretary to report on how this policy will affect the department's functions and costs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The bill titled "Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act" aims to curb the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from purchasing batteries produced by certain foreign companies, most of which are based in China. The prohibition is set to take effect on October 1, 2027. The bill outlines specific companies and entities deemed adversarial, either due to national security concerns or their association with forced labor practices. The legislation also provides for possible waivers under certain conditions and requires reporting on the impacts of this procurement restriction.
Summary of Significant Issues
One key issue is the transition to the prohibition deadline, during which DHS might face supply chain disruptions if alternative battery options are not ready or available. This could adversely affect the department's operations. The criteria for granting waivers, designed to allow flexibility in cases of national security or research needs, lack clarity. This could lead to inconsistent decision-making, potentially undermining the bill's objectives. There is also concern regarding understanding the entity lists referenced in the bill, which might be obscure for those not familiar with related statutes. Lastly, the criteria for assessing the prohibition's impacts on DHS are not specified, raising concerns about the adequacy of the evaluation process.
Impact on the Public
This legislation could potentially improve national security by reducing dependency on foreign-made components that may pose risks. However, it might also lead to increased costs or delays if DHS has to source more expensive or less readily available alternatives domestically or from other countries. The broader public might experience heightened security from reduced reliance on potentially adversarial foreign technology, but this could coincide with budgetary impacts or increased governmental expenditures.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Homeland Security Department: DHS is directly impacted by this bill as it needs to navigate procurement challenges to comply with the new restrictions. Operations might be affected if the transition to alternative suppliers is not smooth. The clarity and enforcement of waiver guidelines will be crucial in ensuring DHS does not face operational inefficiencies.
Battery Manufacturers: Domestic and non-affected foreign companies might benefit from increased business as DHS seeks alternative suppliers. This could lead to boosted production and increased revenue opportunities.
Impacted Foreign Companies: Companies specified in the bill would lose market access to a significant U.S. governmental client, which could impact their financial performance and global market strategies.
U.S. Congress: Legislators will need to monitor waiver usages and assess reports on DHS’s operational impacts to ensure the law achieves its intended goals without unintended negative consequences.
In conclusion, while the bill serves national security interests, careful consideration and planning are necessary to address transition challenges and ensure consistent application of waiver provisions, thereby minimizing negative impacts.
Issues
The prohibition on the procurement of certain foreign-made batteries starting on October 1, 2027, could create supply chain issues for the Department of Homeland Security during the transition period and may affect operations if alternatives are not adequately available (Section 2(a)).
The criteria for granting waivers under subsection (d), especially in 1 (A) and 1 (B), may lead to inconsistent application due to lack of clarity and enforcement, potentially undermining the prohibition's intent (Section 2(d)).
The requirement for Congressional notification within 15 days of granting a waiver under subsection (d)(3) might not ensure adequate oversight if the specifics of the waiver and the reasons for granting it are not detailed (Section 2(d)(3)).
The use of several entities' lists in subsection (b), such as the 'Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act' list and others, might be unclear for those not familiar with these laws, complicating the understanding of which entities are prohibited (Section 2(b)).
The report required on the anticipated impacts does not specify evaluation criteria, which could lead to incomplete or inconsistent assessment and affect the Department's ability to adapt effectively to the prohibition and its associated requirements (Section 2(e)).
The lack of definition for terms such as 'foreign adversarial' and 'battery dependence' in the short title section may lead to ambiguity in understanding the Act's scope and intent (Section 1).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that it can be referred to as the “Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act”.
2. Prohibition on availability of funds for procurement of certain batteries Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Starting October 1, 2027, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is prohibited from using funds to buy batteries made by certain specified companies, mostly from China, unless granted a waiver by the Secretary of Homeland Security for reasons like national security or research. The Secretary must report any waivers to Congress and assess the impact of this rule on Homeland Security's operations.