Overview
Title
To reauthorize and reform counter-unmanned aircraft system authorities, to improve transparency, security, safety, and accountability related to such authorities, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act is a plan to make sure that drones flying near important places like airports are safe and follow the rules, while also making sure people's privacy and fairness are protected.
Summary AI
The Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act aims to reauthorize and reform the way the U.S. manages systems countering unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), such as drones, to enhance transparency, security, safety, and accountability. It outlines measures for the Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Homeland Security, and other agencies to coordinate and manage UAS detection and mitigation at airports and other sensitive locations. The bill also establishes requirements for operator training and limits on using systems from certain foreign manufacturers, and calls for regular reporting to ensure compliance and protection of civil liberties. This legislation is set to expire on October 1, 2028.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, referred to as the "Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act," seeks to reauthorize and improve the counter-unmanned aircraft systems' (UAS) authorities. It is intended to enhance transparency, security, safety, and accountability concerning drone activities, particularly those that could interfere with national airspace operations. The proposal outlines comprehensive measures for managing threats posed by drones, including detection, identification, monitoring, and potentially counteracting these unmanned aircraft systems.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill provides the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and other federal bodies with the authority to detect, track, and mitigate threats from drones. It establishes protocols for safe and efficient coordination among federal agencies and mandates the development of a counter-UAS strategic plan, especially at airports. The bill also authorizes pilot programs and requires annual reporting to Congress on the efficacy and impact of counter-UAS activities. Additionally, it stipulates privacy and civil liberties safeguards during these activities.
Significant Issues
A substantial concern revolves around the bill's broad authority granted to the FAA, which allows for the interception and even destruction of drones without prior consent from operators. This raises serious privacy and civil liberties issues, particularly concerning compliance with the First and Fourth Amendments. The lack of clear definitions and criteria for what constitutes a "credible threat" and terms such as "carelessly or recklessly operate" leads to potential inconsistencies in enforcement. Additionally, the bill's financial implications remain vague, with no specified budgetary limits, opening the door to possible wasteful spending.
The bill also exempts certain counter-UAS activities from federal laws like Title 18, which could lead to ambiguities and potential overreach. The requirement for multiple agencies to coordinate counter-UAS activities may create delays and bureaucratic inefficiencies. Privacy concerns are exacerbated by insufficient details regarding the handling of intercepted communications.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to improve airspace security, which could benefit the general public by addressing potential threats posed by unauthorized drone activities. For individuals and businesses operating drones, the bill might introduce stricter regulations and oversight, potentially reducing the risk of accidents or security breaches related to drones.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Aviation Industry: Airports and airlines might experience enhanced security and safety from improved counter-UAS measures. However, these entities could also face operational challenges if the implementation of these systems leads to air traffic disruptions or legal complexities.
Drone Operators: Hobbyists and commercial drone operators could be adversely impacted due to increased regulations and scrutiny. There are concerns about due process, given the authority to seize or destroy drones without owner consent.
Federal Agencies: While enhanced coordination might improve national security, the division of responsibilities among agencies could lead to budgetary and logistical challenges.
Privacy Advocates: The bill presents significant privacy concerns, especially in terms of interception and use of communications. The perceived potential for rights infringement could draw criticism from civil rights organizations.
In conclusion, while the bill seeks to strengthen national security concerning drone operations, it raises pertinent concerns regarding civil liberties, potential overspending, and the complexity of interagency coordination which need careful consideration and transparent resolution.
Issues
The bill grants broad authority to the FAA Administrator for counter-UAS activities, including interception and destruction of unmanned aircraft systems without prior consent, potentially infringing on privacy rights and civil liberties under the First and Fourth Amendments (Section 4, Section 44810(a)(2)).
There is a lack of specific criteria and standards for determining what constitutes a 'credible threat,' which could lead to subjective and inconsistent enforcement (Section 4, Section 44810(a)(1)).
Ambiguity in financial implications as the bill does not specify the budget or limit on spending for deploying counter-UAS systems, raising concerns over potential wasteful spending (Section 4, Section 4(e), Section 7(b)).
The provision that allows for actions against UAS operators without consent raises significant civil liberties and due process concerns (Section 4, Section 44810(a)(2)).
The exemption from certain federal laws such as Title 18 for counter-UAS activities lacks detailed explanation, which could lead to legal ambiguities and potential overreach (Section 4, Section 44810(b)(1)).
The coordination required among multiple federal agencies for implementing counter-UAS activities might lead to delays or inefficiencies (Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, Section 6, Section 7(d), Section 6(d)).
Definitions in several sections, such as 'carelessly or recklessly operate' (Section 8) and 'persistent disruption' (Section 7(a)(1)(B)), are vague, potentially leading to inconsistent enforcement and legal challenges.
The bill allows significant actions against UAS, including seizure and destruction, potentially affecting civil liberties and due process rights (Section 44810(a)(2)).
The lack of specific financial limits or required budgetary controls for acquiring counter-UAS systems poses risks for potential overspending and inefficient allocation of resources (Section 5, Section 6).
The bill's provisions for sharing intercepted communications lack sufficient detail to prevent unauthorized access or misuse, posing a risk to privacy rights (Section 4, Section 44810(b)(2)).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act introduces the short title “Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act” and lists the act's contents, which include definitions and provisions for protecting facilities from drones, counter-drone activities by the FAA, additional detection and tracking powers, a pilot program for counter-drone measures, planning for systems at airports, enforcement authority, and reporting requirements.
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the definitions used in the Act. It describes various terms such as "appropriate committees of Congress," which include specific committees from both the House of Representatives and the Senate, "covered airport," referring to large or medium hub airports or airports with high cargo traffic, "covered entity," meaning owners of certain sites or organizers of public gatherings, and "covered site," which includes specific facilities and locations related to aviation security and public gatherings.
3. Protection of certain facilities and assets from unmanned aircraft systems Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 aim to enhance the coordination and regulation of unmanned aircraft systems (drones) for security purposes. This includes developing guidelines for their operation, maintenance of communication records, ensuring aviation safety, conducting research and evaluation, and training operators, with a comprehensive list of authorized counter-drone technologies maintained and reviewed for their impact on aviation and communication systems.
4. FAA counter-UAS activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section grants the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) the authority to detect and manage threats posed by unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to the national airspace, with specific actions like seizing or disabling drones allowed under certain conditions. It also establishes an Office of Counter-UAS Activities within the FAA to coordinate these efforts, ensures privacy protection in line with constitutional amendments, and requires interagency coordination.
44810. Counter-UAS activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the authority and responsibilities given to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to manage unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) when they pose a threat to airspace safety. It allows the FAA to detect, control, or disable UAS and ensures plans align with legal privacy safeguards. Additionally, it requires coordination with other government agencies and sets guidelines for testing and using anti-UAS technologies. International agreements and manufacturing restrictions, especially concerning certain foreign companies, are also addressed, with the aim of safeguarding U.S. airspace until October 1, 2028.
5. Additional limited authority for detection, identification, monitoring, and tracking Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows the Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with other officials, to authorize and manage the use of approved systems to detect and track unmanned aircraft systems at specific sites. This includes setting up application processes, agreements, training requirements, and audits, while ensuring public safety and privacy, and coordinating with the Federal Aviation Administration and the Attorney General. The authority granted under this section will end on October 1, 2028, and can be suspended if it threatens the national airspace system's safety or efficiency.
6. Counter-UAS mitigation State law enforcement pilot program Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a pilot program allowing state law enforcement agencies to use counter-UAS (Unmanned Aircraft Systems) mitigation systems at designated sites to tackle unauthorized drone operations. It details application procedures, required agreements, coordination with federal agencies, and evaluation criteria, with the program set to end on October 1, 2028.
7. Counter-UAS system planning and deployment at airports Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines plans and requirements for deploying counter-drone systems at major airports to enhance safety and security. It includes coordination between federal agencies, airport and law enforcement personnel, and sets timelines for implementation, evaluation, and guidelines for using these systems to detect and mitigate unauthorized drones.
8. UAS detection and mitigation enforcement authority Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section of the bill adds a new rule to U.S. law that prohibits individuals from using technology to interfere with airport or airspace operations by carelessly handling drones, while allowing the Federal Aviation Administration to enforce actions against such violations. It specifies that the Federal Government and its authorized personnel are exempt and sets penalties for unauthorized individuals or small businesses that break these rules.
44815. Unmanned aircraft system detection and mitigation enforcement Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits individuals from using systems or technology that interfere with unmanned aircraft systems in ways that could disrupt airport or airspace safety. However, this does not apply to federal government agencies or their authorized employees and contractors.
9. Reporting on counter-UAS activities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to release a public report annually, in collaboration with the FAA and Attorney General, detailing the government's activities on detecting and countering drones. The report must cover violations, data on activities, impacts on First Amendment rights, methods used, and privacy protections, and it must be available online in an unclassified format.