Overview

Title

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit access by certain individuals to certain areas of airports, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 8608 is a rule that wants to stop people from certain countries that helped bad guys from getting into special parts of airports where they shouldn't be. The rule is made to keep us safe, and a special airport guard group will make sure it's followed.

Summary AI

H.R. 8608 seeks to amend title 49 of the United States Code to prevent individuals associated with certain countries from accessing specific areas in airports, such as the secured, sterile, and air cargo areas. The bill identifies these countries as those that have repeatedly supported international terrorism, as determined by the Secretary of State, within the last three years. The measure grants the Transportation Security Administration's Administrator the authority to enforce these restrictions.

Published

2024-06-04
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-06-04
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8608ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
575
Pages:
3
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 174
Verbs: 28
Adjectives: 28
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 36
Entities: 46

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.95
Average Sentence Length:
44.23
Token Entropy:
4.72
Readability (ARI):
22.43

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Bill

H.R. 8608, titled the "Secure Airports From Enemies Act" or the "SAFE Act," is a legislative proposal aimed at enhancing airport security. The bill seeks to amend title 49 of the United States Code to prohibit certain individuals from accessing specific areas of airports. These restrictions target individuals who are identified as representatives of countries that the U.S. government, specifically the Secretary of State, has determined to have supported international terrorism in recent years. The specified restricted areas of airports include the secured area, the Security Identification Display Area (SIDA), the sterile area, and the air cargo area.

Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the bill's language and proposed requirements:

  1. Criteria and Transparency: The bill does not detail how the Secretary of State will determine which countries have supported international terrorism, raising concerns about transparency and potential arbitrariness in decision-making.

  2. Ambiguity in Language: Terms such as "acting on behalf of" and references to "any other provision of law" are vague. This lack of specificity might lead to varied interpretations and inconsistent enforcement.

  3. Dependencies on External Definitions: The bill relies on definitions from an external document, which could complicate its understanding and implementation without additional resources.

Broader Impact

The bill has the potential to impact the general public, particularly travelers, by aiming to enhance the security of U.S. airports. Restricting access to critical areas of airports from those associated with countries supporting terrorism could help prevent security breaches and potentially reduce the risk of terrorist activities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Travelers: While enhanced security could lead to increased safety for travelers, it might also involve more stringent security checks and procedures, potentially causing inconveniences or travel delays.

  • International Relations: The bill could affect diplomatic relations, as countries labeled as supportive of terrorism might contest such designations. Transparency in the criteria for these determinations is essential to minimize diplomatic tensions.

  • Airport Authorities and Security Staff: The implementation of these new security measures may require additional training, resources, and coordination with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to ensure compliance with new restrictions effectively.

Overall, while the intent of the SAFE Act is to secure airports from potential threats, the lack of clarity in its current draft raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and practical execution. Addressing these issues could enhance the bill's effectiveness and acceptance amongst stakeholders.

Issues

  • The bill does not specify the criteria or process by which the Secretary of State determines if a country has provided support for international terrorism (Section 2, Subsection c). This lack of transparency could lead to arbitrary or inconsistent decisions, impacting international relations and potentially violating procedural fairness.

  • The term 'acting on behalf of' in Section 2, Subsection a could be broadly interpreted. Without a precise definition, this might lead to misuse or misunderstandings, affecting individuals who have legitimate reasons to access certain airport areas.

  • The open-ended reference to 'any other provision of law' in Section 2, Subsection c could cause inconsistent application of the law. By not specifying which laws might apply, there is room for multiple interpretations, leading to confusion and potentially unfair enforcement.

  • The language used in the title of Section 44930 ('certain access' and 'certain individuals') is vague and could be clarified to avoid ambiguity. This lack of specificity might hinder understanding and compliance by those affected.

  • The bill relies on definitions given in an external document (section 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations) for key terms like 'secured area', 'Security Identification Display Area (SIDA)', and 'sterile area'. This reliance could make the bill difficult to understand without consulting additional resources, potentially leading to compliance issues.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it can be referred to as the "Secure Airports From Enemies Act" or simply the "SAFE Act".

2. Prohibition on access by certain individuals to certain areas of airports Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section introduces a rule that prohibits certain individuals from accessing specific airport areas if they are associated with a country identified by the Secretary of State as supporting international terrorism. These restricted areas include secured, sterile, and cargo sections, and the rule empowers the Transportation Security Administration to enforce this restriction.

44930. Prohibition on certain access by certain individuals Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

In this section, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is prohibited from allowing individuals who represent or act on behalf of certain countries to access specific secure areas of airports. These restricted areas include the secured area, the Security Identification Display Area (SIDA), the sterile area, and the air cargo area. The countries in question are those that the Secretary of State has determined, in the past three years, have supported international terrorism under certain laws.