Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish the critical supply chains reshoring investment tax credit.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to give a big tax break to companies that build or improve factories in certain parts of the U.S., like Puerto Rico, to make important things, such as medicines and computer chips, so that these items are made closer to home.
Summary AI
The bill H. R. 8504 proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to introduce a tax credit aimed at encouraging the reshoring of critical supply chain facilities back to the United States. This tax credit would cover 40% of the investment made in property that is essential to the operation of supply chain facilities producing items like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and aerospace equipment. The primary condition is that these facilities must be placed in service after December 31, 2024, and must be located in certain U.S. possessions or Puerto Rico. The bill aims to strengthen national supply chains by incentivizing domestic manufacturing of crucial products.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The legislation, known as the "Supply Chain Security and Growth Act of 2024," proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, introducing a new tax credit termed the "Critical Supply Chains Reshoring Investment Credit." This credit is designed to encourage businesses to invest in facilities integral to certain critical supply chains. Eligible facilities must primarily focus on the manufacturing of essential products such as pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and aerospace equipment. The tax credit allows businesses to claim 40% of their qualified investment when these facilities are placed in service after December 31, 2024, and must be located in specified areas, such as Puerto Rico.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill raises several notable issues, particularly in how it defines and manages eligibility for the tax credit. One major concern is the broad definition of what constitutes a "critical supply chain facility." This could potentially allow a wide range of facilities to qualify, leading to budgetary concerns due to a higher-than-anticipated number of eligible recipients.
Additionally, the location requirement limits eligible facilities to those in "specified possessions" or Puerto Rico, which could inadvertently exclude regions that may also benefit from such investments, raising questions of fairness. Furthermore, the bill includes terms like "substantial improvement test," "integral to the operation," and "tangible property," which may lack clarity and lead to varied interpretations, complicating compliance for businesses and potentially facilitating misuse.
The coordination of this credit with other tax credits could also be complex. The bill specifies that if a facility receives the reshoring credit, it cannot also receive an electricity production credit. This requires careful management to avoid confusion among businesses over credit eligibility.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the bill aims to strengthen the United States' supply chain security by reshoring the manufacturing of essential products. By offering significant tax incentives, it encourages companies to invest domestically, potentially leading to increased production capacity and job creation in critical sectors. However, the effectiveness of this encouragement depends heavily on the clarity and implementation of the bill's provisions.
Impact on Stakeholders
Businesses and Industries: The bill could be highly beneficial for businesses involved in the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, aerospace equipment, and other specified critical products. For these stakeholders, the 40% tax credit represents a significant financial incentive to invest in new or improved facilities. However, industries not explicitly mentioned or located outside the specified areas might feel disadvantaged, perceiving the bill as offering preferential treatment.
Regional Economies: Areas specified in the bill, like Puerto Rico, may see increased economic activity and job growth from potential new investments. However, other regions that do not meet the location criteria might miss out on these growth opportunities, potentially leading to regional economic disparities.
Government and Budget: The government will need to guard against potential misuse of the tax credit due to unclear definitions and lack of fraud prevention mechanisms. Ensuring compliance and avoiding excessive claims will be critical to managing the bill's financial impact on the federal budget.
Overall, while the bill could drive substantial investments and enhance the country's supply chain resilience, its success will depend heavily on addressing the highlighted issues and ensuring equitable and effective implementation.
Issues
The broad definition of 'critical supply chain facility' in Section 48F may lead to a wide range of facilities qualifying for the credit, potentially leading to excessive spending and budgetary concerns.
The location requirement for a facility to be in a 'specified possession' or Puerto Rico in Section 48F could exclude other regions that might benefit from the credit, raising fairness and favoritism concerns.
The lack of a clear definition for the 'substantial improvement test' in Section 48F for reconstructed property might cause ambiguity regarding compliance and eligibility for the credit.
The potential for preferential treatment towards certain industries, like semiconductors and aerospace, explicitly mentioned in Section 48F, may raise issues of equitable treatment across industries.
Section 45(e) contains a coordination clause that may need clarification to prevent confusion over eligibility for multiple tax credits, as it prohibits a facility from being a 'qualified facility' if it receives a credit under Section 48F.
Terms such as 'integral to the operation' and 'tangible property' in Section 48F are not specifically defined, which may lead to varied interpretations and compliance challenges.
There is no specified mechanism in the bill for preventing or identifying fraudulent claims, which could lead to the misuse of funds intended for reshoring.
The applicability of the credit only to property placed in service after December 31, 2024, as stated in Section 2(d), might delay investments that could have immediate benefits.
The use of sections and regulations from other acts without clear definitions in Section 48F may cause confusion and require extensive cross-referencing by the reader.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act states that the official title of this legislation is the “Supply Chain Security and Growth Act of 2024.”
2. Critical supply chains reshoring investment credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The proposed section introduces a tax credit called the "Critical Supply Chains Reshoring Investment Credit," which allows businesses to receive a credit equal to 40% of their investment in certain facilities critical to the supply chain, such as those manufacturing pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and aerospace equipment, if these facilities are placed in service after December 31, 2024. It also specifies that if this credit is claimed, businesses cannot claim a different credit related to electricity production for the same facility.
48F. Critical supply chains reshoring investment credit Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines a tax credit for businesses investing in critical supply chain facilities, covering 40% of the investment cost for qualifying properties used for manufacturing crucial products like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and aerospace equipment. These facilities must be located in specific areas such as Puerto Rico, and the properties must be new or significantly improved.