Overview
Title
To provide States with support to establish integrated care programs for individuals who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 8503, or the "DUALS Act of 2024," is a plan to help states make better healthcare programs for people who get both Medicare and Medicaid, and it also lets people choose their own medicine plans.
Summary AI
H.R. 8503, titled the "Delivering Unified Access to Lifesaving Services Act of 2024" or "DUALS Act of 2024", aims to help states create integrated care programs for people who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid. It outlines the development of integrated care models, data reporting, and enrollment processes, providing guidelines for states to automatically enroll eligible individuals and offering them the option to opt-out. The bill also enhances the PACE program, allowing eligible individuals under 55 to enroll, and removes restrictions on the timing and geographical area for PACE program applications. Additionally, it ensures these individuals have a choice of prescription drug plans under Medicare Part D.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill titled "Delivering Unified Access to Lifesaving Services Act of 2024" (DUALS Act of 2024) is designed to support states in establishing integrated care programs for people who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid. These individuals are known as "dual eligible" because their income and age or disability status make them eligible for both federal health programs. The bill outlines government-supported initiatives to enhance healthcare delivery for this group by forming unified, streamlined access to necessary medical services.
General Summary of the Bill
The main aim of the DUALS Act is to assist states in creating and managing integrated care programs for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. These programs are intended to simplify the enrollment process, improve coordination of care, and ensure that dual eligible individuals receive continuous and comprehensive healthcare services. In addition to integrated care for dual eligibles, the act requires states to provide PACE program services. The PACE program offers a comprehensive care option targeting older adults dealing with chronic health issues or disabilities, allowing them to receive care while living in their communities.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill presents several potential issues and concerns:
Complex Language and Structure: The legalistic and dense language used throughout the bill, along with numerous references to existing laws and codes, could make it challenging for the general public and smaller healthcare providers to understand the proposed changes. This complexity might exclude certain groups from engaging in the public consultation process.
Passive Enrollment: The provision allowing for passive enrollment of individuals in new care plans without requiring active consent could lead to ethical concerns about transparency and individual autonomy. The risk is that individuals might find themselves enrolled without a full understanding of the implications, resulting in unexpected costs or disruptions in their care.
Accountability and Oversight: There is a noticeable lack of detailed accountability mechanisms or limitations on funding, particularly in the sections addressing appropriations. This situation might lead to uncontrolled spending that could strain state and federal budgets.
Federal Authority: The bill grants extensive authority to the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office, which might be perceived as federal overreach. This could potentially limit states' abilities to customize programs based on their unique circumstances and needs.
Privacy Concerns: The extensive data collection mandated by the bill raises privacy concerns, especially because it involves sensitive demographic and health information. Without robust protections, there is a risk of misuse or unauthorized sharing of personal data.
Potential Impacts on the Public
On a broad scale, the bill could significantly alter how integrated care is delivered to the nation's elderly and low-income populations. A streamlined process for receiving healthcare services could theoretically offer more consistent and comprehensive care, reducing anxiety and uncertainty for dual eligible individuals and their families. However, if the execution is not careful, the complexity and possible financial overreach indicated in the bill might create confusion and strain public resources.
Potential Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Positive Impacts: - Dual Eligible Individuals: Should the programs work as intended, this group could benefit from improved healthcare coordination, simplified processes, and potentially more comprehensive service options. - Healthcare Providers: Providers might see shifts towards more centralized and coordinated care delivery models, which could streamline operations and possibly enhance patient outcomes.
Negative Impacts: - State Governments: States are required to undertake significant efforts to comply with the program models and changes, possibly straining their fiscal and administrative resources, especially if they lack adequate infrastructure. - Privacy Advocates: There could be serious concerns about the protection of personal data, risking potential misuse or breaches of sensitive health and demographic information.
In conclusion, the DUALS Act proposes ambitious changes to current healthcare systems aiming to assist some of the most vulnerable populations. Nonetheless, the challenges surrounding implementation, autonomy, and privacy must be addressed to safeguard the interests of all stakeholders involved and to ensure that the intended benefits reach those in need without unintended consequences.
Financial Assessment
The Delivering Unified Access to Lifesaving Services Act of 2024 discusses several aspects of financial spending and appropriations designed to support the establishment of integrated care programs for individuals who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. Key sections of the bill address financial matters, and it is important to understand how these align with potential issues identified in the bill.
Financial Appropriations and Spending
The bill outlines several financial allocations to support the implementation of integrated care programs:
Initial State Funding: The bill provides for initial funding during the first two years to establish and operate State Ombudsman offices. Each state will receive an amount proportional to its number of dual eligible individuals, compared to the total number in all states. The total amount is $50,000,000 per year.
General Administrative Expenses: Each state will receive funds for administrative expenses to carry out the title's provisions, again based on the proportion of dual eligible individuals in the state to the total number nationwide. The financial allocation for this purpose again ties to $50,000,000 annually.
Data Collection and Reporting: An allocation of $50,000,000 per year is designated for data collection and reporting purposes. This funding is intended to support states in gathering requisite information and maintaining the transparency of integrated care programs.
Shared Savings and Other Payments to States: The bill authorizes shared savings payments to states, contingent on their participation and implementation of integrated care plans. The exact amounts are guided by the specifics determined under the bill's shared savings model.
Relating Financials to Identified Issues
The financial provisions in the bill correlate strongly with certain issues identified:
Potential for Uncontrolled Spending: Sections like SEC. 2207 and SEC. 2208 mention sizable financial allocations without clear accountability mechanisms. This could lead to concerns about uncontrolled spending or financial mismanagement, possibly leading to inefficiencies and spending beyond what state budgets can sustain. The appropriation of $50 million annually for various administrative functions can strain financial resources if not carefully monitored.
Federal Overreach: The centralized financial authority given to the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office to manage these funds could raise concerns about federal overreach. It may impact how much flexibility states have in tailoring programs to their specific needs, mainly if financial allocations are seen as tied to strict federal guidelines.
Privacy and Data Concerns: Given the financial allocations for data reporting and collection, there are concerns relating to how demographic and personal health data is handled. With $50 million allocated for this purpose, sufficient financial resources exist to support robust data protections, but the bill needs to explicitly ensure these measures are in place to guard against data misuse.
Administrative Burden on States: The financial requirements for providing PACE program services (SEC. 401) and integrated care could represent an increased financial and administrative burden on states, beyond their fiscal capabilities or existing infrastructure. The mandate to allocate substantial funds from state budgets for these programs may pressure states already facing financial restraints.
The financial elements contained in the DUALS Act of 2024 necessitate careful scrutiny and adherence to robust financial oversight and reporting mechanisms to ensure effective and equitable utilization of funds.
Issues
The language used throughout the bill is complex and might be difficult for the general public and stakeholders not well-versed in legislative or healthcare jargon to understand, potentially leading to misinterpretations or exclusion from meaningful participation in the public consultation process. This is especially relevant in sections like the introduction and the use of technical terms in various definitions (e.g., SEC. 2201).
The approach to passive enrollment of dual eligible individuals in integrated care plans without active consent (SEC. 2203) could raise ethical concerns about transparency and individual autonomy. The potential lack of robust notification and opt-out processes could lead to confusion and unintended costs for individuals who are unaware of their enrollment.
The lack of clearly defined accountability mechanisms and funding limitations, particularly in sections related to appropriations (e.g., SEC. 2207 and SEC. 2208), raises concerns about uncontrolled or wasteful spending, which could financially burden state administrations and federal budgets.
The exclusion of PACE programs from the definition of an 'integrated care plan' without a clear rationale (SEC. 2201) might lead to questions regarding fairness and consistency in the application of integrated care benefits across different population segments, particularly affecting the elderly and those with chronic conditions.
The bill grants significant centralized authority to the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office (FCHCO), which might lead to concerns regarding federal overreach, especially in areas like state selection of program models and the lack of flexibility for states to tailor programs to their specific needs (SEC. 2202 and SEC. 2208).
The requirement for states to provide PACE program services without a numerical enrollment limit (SEC. 401) could lead to increased financial and administrative burdens on states, potentially without consideration of their fiscal capabilities and infrastructure readiness.
Concerns about the privacy of personal data exist in sections discussing data collection and reporting (SEC. 2205), especially regarding demographic and sensitive health information, which may not be sufficiently protected or could lead to discrimination if misused.
The bill's allowance for automatic disenrollment with financial implications (SEC. 2203 and SEC. 2204) and lack of enforcement for data collection/reporting compliance might lead to gaps in the quality of care and oversight, leaving high-risk populations unchecked.
The provisions allowing development and testing of partially integrated care models without clear evaluation metrics or financial controls (SEC. 210) could lead to resource inefficiencies and possibly ineffective healthcare delivery for partial benefit dual eligible individuals.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title; table of contents Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The act is officially named the "Delivering Unified Access to Lifesaving Services Act of 2024," also called the "DUALS Act of 2024." It outlines various programs and requirements to improve care coordination, eligibility, and enrollment processes for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, along with guidelines for state integrated care programs and the PACE program, which offers healthcare services to older adults.
101. State implementation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill introduces State Integrated Care Programs aimed at providing comprehensive health care for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid, known as dual eligible individuals. It defines key terms, outlines state responsibilities for implementing care models, and details requirements for integrated care plans, including enrollment, care coordination, continuity of care, and data reporting, while establishing funding mechanisms and appointing a state ombudsman for oversight.
Money References
- — “(1) INITIAL FUNDING.—During the first 2 years in which a State operates the Office, the Secretary shall pay to the State for each such year for expenditures necessary to establish and operate the Office, from amounts appropriated under section 2207(c), an amount equal to $50,000,000 multiplied by the ratio of— “(A) the number of dual eligible individuals in the State; to “(B) the number of dual eligible individuals in all States.
- (2) GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—For administrative expenses to carry out this title, other than section 2205, an amount that bears the same proportion to $50,000,000 as the number of dual eligible individuals in the State bears to the number of dual eligible individuals in all States, as determined by the Secretary.
- “(3) DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING.—For data collection and reporting expenses under section 2205, an amount that bears the same proportion to $50,000,000 as the number of dual eligible individuals in the State bears to the number of dual eligible individuals in all States, as determined by the Secretary.
- “(4) SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS STANDARDS AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—To establish standards for reporting by States and integrated care plans under title XXII information relating to the offering and provision of supplemental benefits under section 2204(d)(3), including data relating to enrollment, utilization, and outcomes, to annually publish a report regarding the offering and utilization of such benefits, and to study and report to the Secretary on whether to cap the actuarial dollar value allowed for such benefits under titles XVIII, XIX, and XXII
2201. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the term "Director" refers to the head of a specific health care office in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. "Dual eligible individual" identifies a person who qualifies for both Medicare and Medicaid benefits. "Integrated care plan" describes a program chosen by a state to provide comprehensive care to dual eligible individuals, but it doesn't include a PACE program.
2202. State selection of program models, development, and implementation Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, each state must choose and implement a program to provide integrated care for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid within one year of the Director's model announcement. The implementation should start enrolling people by the fourth year, but could begin earlier if ready. States must also form an implementation council with a variety of stakeholders to guide this process, while the Director can adjust timelines based on state needs.
2203. Enrollment in integrated care plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines how states can automatically enroll dual eligible individuals in integrated care plans while allowing them to opt out, requiring that they are informed at least 60 days before enrollment. It also covers enrollment conditions, such as needing an in-network primary care provider, and permits enrollment changes monthly or during specified periods, while allowing care coordinators to contact individuals before enrollment becomes effective.
2204. Plan requirements and payments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines requirements for contracts between states, integrated care plan providers, and the Director regarding dual eligible individuals. It includes provisions for maintaining continuity of care, conducting health risk assessments, offering comprehensive care plans and benefits, and appointing care coordinators, along with payment structures and potential adjustments for frail individuals.
2205. Data collection and reporting Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Under Section 2205, each state and integrated care plan must annually gather and report data about dual eligible individuals to the Director. This information includes personal details such as age, gender, disability, and other demographics. States can also require these plans to collect additional data.
2206. State ombudsman Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Each state is required to set up an Office of the Ombudsman to assist people who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid with their healthcare plans. The Office will be managed by someone experienced in these programs and will offer support to the individuals and their families, with specific funding and staffing requirements.
Money References
- — (1) INITIAL FUNDING.—During the first 2 years in which a State operates the Office, the Secretary shall pay to the State for each such year for expenditures necessary to establish and operate the Office, from amounts appropriated under section 2207(c), an amount equal to $50,000,000 multiplied by the ratio of— (A) the number of dual eligible individuals in the State; to (B) the number of dual eligible individuals in all States.
2207. Funding Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section explains how states will receive funding when they make payments to integrated care plans for Medicaid services. It states that the funding will come from federal sources, including Medicare trust funds, and outlines how this money will be allocated for shared savings, administrative expenses, and data collection related to dual eligible individuals, starting from the first full calendar year the law is enacted in a state.
Money References
- (b) Payments to States.—From the sums appropriated under subsection (c), the Secretary shall pay to each State for each calendar year (beginning January 1 of the first full calendar year in which this title is implemented in the State), an amount equal to the sum of the following: (1) SHARED SAVINGS COMPONENT.—The shared savings payment applicable to the State and the year, as determined in accordance with section 2208(b)(6)(D). (2) GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—For administrative expenses to carry out this title, other than section 2205, an amount that bears the same proportion to $50,000,000 as the number of dual eligible individuals in the State bears to the number of dual eligible individuals in all States, as determined by the Secretary. (3) DATA COLLECTION AND REPORTING.—For data collection and reporting expenses under section 2205
- , an amount that bears the same proportion to $50,000,000 as the number of dual eligible individuals in the State bears to the number of dual eligible individuals in all States, as determined by the Secretary.
2208. Federal administration through the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Federal Coordinated Health Care Office (FCHCO) is responsible for creating and managing programs to improve healthcare for people eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. The Director must develop care models, appeals processes, and quality measures, while also ensuring states report on benefits and maintaining oversight of integrated care plans. This includes creating payment structures, training programs, and data collection to enhance care coordination and patient satisfaction.
Money References
- (b) Responsibilities of the FCHCO.—In carrying out this title, the Director shall have the following responsibilities: (1) DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLICATION OF INTEGRATED CARE PROGRAM MODELS.—Subject to subsection (c), to develop and, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this paragraph, publish, a range of program models (including but not limited to Medicare-Medicaid plans, accountable care organizations, and dual eligible special needs plans) for providing integrated care for dual eligible individuals from which States shall select to develop and administer integrated care programs for dual eligible individuals in accordance with this title. (2) UNIFIED APPEALS PROCESS.—To develop and, not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this paragraph, publish a unified administrative appeals process for State integrated care programs for dual eligible individuals under this title to use in lieu of other administrative appeals processes involving Medicare and Medicaid. (3) HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT.—To develop a standardized health risk assessment questionnaire for dual eligible individuals that collects standard demographic data and information relating to food insecurity, access to transportation, internet access, utility difficulty, interpersonal safety, and housing instability. (4) SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS STANDARDS AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.—To establish standards for reporting by States and integrated care plans under title XXII information relating to the offering and provision of supplemental benefits under section 2204(d)(3), including data relating to enrollment, utilization, and outcomes, to annually publish a report regarding the offering and utilization of such benefits, and to study and report to the Secretary on whether to cap the actuarial dollar value allowed for such benefits under titles XVIII, XIX, and XXII.
102. Providing Federal Coordinated Health Care Office authority over dual snps Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
For plan years starting on or after January 1, 2025, the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office will take charge of managing the integration of special Medicare Advantage plans designed for individuals with special needs. Additionally, an amendment to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ensures they have the authority to carry out this responsibility.
103. Additional conforming amendments Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section makes updates to the Social Security Act by expanding certain definitions and amending rules related to Medicare and Medicaid enrollment. It allows dual eligible individuals to enroll in new care plans and aims to prevent Medicaid from making duplicate payments for these individuals.
201. Identifying opportunities for State coordination with respect to eligibility determinations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with States, is required to review State processes for determining eligibility for certain healthcare programs within one year of the Act's enactment. Additionally, the Secretary must issue guidance to improve coordination between States and the Federal government for these eligibility determinations.
202. Alignment of bidding, reporting, and other dates and deadlines for integrated care plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Director of the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office and the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to review and identify necessary changes to align the important dates and deadlines for integrated care plans under Medicare, Medicaid, and State Integrated Care Programs for Dual Eligible Individuals, ensuring consistency within 180 days after the Act's passage.
203. Grants to State and local community organizations for outreach and enrollment Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Health and Human Services will give grants to state and local community organizations to help dual eligible individuals enroll in health plans that provide integrated care. These organizations must follow certain standards to ensure information is accessible and understandable, including being available in multiple languages and accessible formats for people with disabilities. An annual budget of $50 million is allocated for this initiative.
Money References
- (c) Appropriation.—There is appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the first fiscal year that begins after the date of enactment of this Act, and for each fiscal year thereafter, $50,000,000 to carry out this section. ---
204. Application of model standards to information requirements for integrated care plans Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires that within one year of the law being passed, the directors responsible for Medicare and Medicaid must publish guidance or rules. These rules will ensure that any information given to people who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid meets specific standards.
205. Enrollment through independent brokers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires that, within a year, guidance or regulations be established to ensure that dual eligible individuals can only be enrolled in certain health plans by independent brokers, with brokers receiving commissions only on initial enrollments. If a broker switches an individual to a plan with less integrated care, they must inform the individual about the change and its potential effects on their healthcare.
206. Reducing threshold for look-alike D–SNP plans under Medicare Advantage Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is instructed to change a regulation concerning Medicare Advantage plans for look-alike D–SNPs by lowering a percentage threshold from 80% to 50%. Additionally, only full-benefit dual eligible individuals will be counted when applying this threshold.
207. Requiring regular update of provider directories Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to create rules within a year that ensure Medicare Advantage and integrated care plans regularly update their provider directories. It also mandates including a rating for how current these directories are in the star rating systems for such health plans.
208. Review of hospital quality star rating system Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to review the hospital quality star rating system within 180 days of the new law's enactment. They must identify any changes needed to ensure the system collects enough information to accurately measure the quality of hospitals.
209. Requirement for FCHCO and State Medicaid agencies to develop maximum staffing ratios for care coordinators Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the director of the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office to work with State Medicaid agencies to create a plan for a maximum number of patients each care coordinator should handle in integrated care programs for people eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. This plan must be submitted within 180 days to various government officials and committees.
210. CMMI testing of coverage of partial benefit dual eligible individuals through State Integrated Care Programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill proposes changes to the Social Security Act to test a model that allows states to provide healthcare coverage to individuals who are partially eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid but do not receive full benefits, through partly integrated care programs. This model aims to help low-income individuals who qualify for certain subsidies but not full dual eligibility benefits.
301. Alignment of billing codes under titles XVIII, XIX, and XXII Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section requires the Director of the Federal Coordinated Health Care Office and the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to align billing codes for Medicare, Medicaid, and State Integrated Care Programs for Dual Eligible Individuals. They must review existing codes, hold a public listening session, and propose necessary changes within 180 days to ensure consistency across these programs.
401. Requiring States to offer PACE program services to eligible individuals Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill changes the Social Security Act to require states to offer PACE program services to eligible individuals, removing previous state options to limit enrollment numbers. It also mandates that state plans provide medical assistance for PACE services to those enrolled in a PACE program, with these changes taking effect 180 days after the bill is enacted.
402. Enrollment of PACE beneficiaries at any time Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section allows individuals eligible for the PACE program to enroll at any time, and it provides for adjustments in payment to PACE providers based on when during the month a person enrolls. These changes will take effect 180 days after the law is enacted.
403. Extending eligibility for PACE to medicare-eligible individuals under the age of 55 Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section extends eligibility for the PACE program, which helps people with healthcare and support services, to Medicare-eligible individuals who are younger than 55, as long as they qualify for Medicare Part A or Part B. This change takes effect 180 days after the bill is enacted.
404. Removal of quarterly restrictions for submission of a new pace organization application, and removal of quarterly restrictions for applications in a new service area Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section removes limitations that previously restricted how often and where organizations can apply to start PACE programs, allowing them to submit applications multiple times in the same quarter and in the same service area. This change will become effective 180 days after the law is enacted.
405. Ensuring Medicare-only PACE program enrollees have a choice of prescription drug plans under Medicare part D Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Medicare enrollees in PACE programs will have the option to choose a standalone prescription drug plan starting in 2024. These plans must offer equal or lower out-of-pocket costs than the current PACE plan, and PACE programs are required to educate and assist enrollees in making their choices.