Overview
Title
To require the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to collect and make publicly available data on properties receiving an allocation of credit under the low-income housing tax credit, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The Housing Market Transparency Act is like a rule that asks a government helper to keep track of and share information about houses that get special money help for people with less money. This is to help everyone see and understand where and how this money is used for making homes better and more affordable.
Summary AI
H. R. 8500, known as the “Housing Market Transparency Act,” aims to improve transparency around properties receiving the low-income housing tax credit in the United States. It mandates that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regularly collect detailed data about these properties, including their development costs, ownership details, and habitability standards. This information must be reported by state agencies and made publicly available by HUD, ensuring open access and understanding of housing projects supported by this tax credit. Additionally, the bill seeks to streamline data collection efforts and avoid duplicated reporting for properties involved in multiple housing programs.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the "Housing Market Transparency Act," is introduced to enhance transparency and improve data collection concerning properties that receive allocations under the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) program. This program, central to supporting affordable housing development in the U.S., is administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
General Summary
The bill mandates the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to systematically collect and make publicly available a range of data related to buildings benefiting from the LIHTC. This data includes, but is not limited to, development costs, ownership details, and compliance with habitability standards. State agencies responsible for the administration of these credits are required to submit data annually to HUD. The act aims to promote transparency and to ensure more coordinated efforts in housing development across state and federal levels.
Significant Issues
The bill presents several notable issues:
Privacy Concerns: There are apprehensions about the privacy of financial details and ownership information that will be made publicly accessible. Stakeholders involved in property development and ownership may find this level of transparency intrusive.
Administrative and Financial Burdens: The requirement for detailed reporting could place a significant burden on state agencies, many of which might not currently have the infrastructure or resources to efficiently manage and submit this level of detailed data collection. Implementing these demands may require considerable funding and technical support.
Undefined Parameters and Timelines: The bill does not clearly outline the timeline for developing standards for data collection, nor does it define what "technical assistance" entails. This lack of specificity may delay implementation and cause inconsistencies in support extended to state agencies.
Scope and Clarity Issues: The bill narrowly defines "covered property," potentially excluding other properties that benefit from similar tax incentives. Additionally, certain references within the bill lack clarity, leading to possible interpretative issues.
Broader Public Impact
If implemented, this bill might provide insights into the efficiency and effectiveness of the LIHTC program by offering stakeholders, including policymakers, developers, and advocacy groups, access to comprehensive data. This could help in identifying trends, best practices, and areas requiring improvement within the affordable housing sector.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
State Agencies: These agencies may face increased workloads and financial challenges to meet new reporting requirements. The success of the bill's implementation largely hinges on their ability to handle these additional responsibilities.
Property Owners and Developers: Owners, especially those structured as pass-through entities, might experience increased scrutiny due to public access to detailed financial data. This could affect their operational privacy and potentially influence investment strategies.
Regulatory Bodies and Policymakers: The enhanced data transparency could aid in the formulation of more effective housing policies and provide a basis for improved resource allocation across housing programs.
In essence, the intention behind the "Housing Market Transparency Act" appears aligned with creating a more accountable and data-driven approach to managing and improving the low-income housing sector. However, its efficacy will likely depend on addressing the outlined issues, particularly concerning privacy, feasibility of implementation, and clarity of the bill's language.
Issues
Section 2(b)(4)(A): There are potential privacy concerns with the requirement for ownership and financial information, such as general contractor costs, to be publicly available.
Section 2(b)(1)(I): The phrase 'any other data determined relevant by the Secretary' is open-ended and could lead to unnecessary data collection or inconsistencies.
Section 2(b)(3)(A): The lack of a specified timeline for setting data collection standards and definitions could cause delays in implementation, impacting the overall effectiveness of the bill.
Section 2(b)(2): The provision imposes a potentially heavy administrative burden on State agencies, which may not have the resources or infrastructure to collect and report such detailed data, possibly necessitating significant additional funding.
Section 2(b)(4)(A): The reference to 'date described in subparagraph (A)' is ambiguous as subparagraph (A) does not clearly define a specific date.
Section 2(a)(1): The definition of 'COVERED PROPERTY' is very specific and might exclude other properties receiving housing tax credits under different sections or incentives, potentially limiting the bill’s scope.
Section 2(b)(3)(B): The bill does not clearly define 'technical assistance,' which may lead to inconsistent support for State agencies in setting up data systems.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill gives it a short title, allowing it to be called the "Housing Market Transparency Act."
2. HUD reporting and transparency on low-income housing tax credit projects Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is required to collect and publicly share information about buildings receiving certain federal housing tax credits, such as development costs and ownership details, to promote transparency and coordination among state agencies. These agencies must provide the data annually, and procedures will be set to avoid repeating reporting requirements for properties involved in multiple housing programs.