Overview

Title

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to expand the provision of farmer-led technical assistance, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 8488 is a plan to help farmers learn from each other by creating special farmer groups that share knowledge and tools. These groups will focus on helping farmers who need the most support and live in areas with more poverty.

Summary AI

H.R. 8488, known as the "Farmer to Farmer Education Act of 2024," aims to amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to boost farmer-led technical assistance. It proposes the establishment of "farmer-to-farmer networks," which would help farmers share information and resources with each other. The Secretary of Agriculture is allowed to form cooperative agreements with eligible entities, like nonprofit organizations and local governments, to support these networks. Additionally, priority for these programs will be given to historically underserved farmers and those in high-poverty areas.

Published

2024-05-21
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-05-21
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8488ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
1,501
Pages:
8
Sentences:
26

Language

Nouns: 410
Verbs: 96
Adjectives: 83
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 54
Entities: 47

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.05
Average Sentence Length:
57.73
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
29.45

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Bill

H. R. 8488, known as the "Farmer to Farmer Education Act of 2024," proposes amendments to the Food Security Act of 1985. The primary aim is to bolster the infrastructure and capacity of farmer-led networks that provide technical assistance and knowledge sharing. By allowing the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into cooperative agreements with various entities such as nonprofit organizations, tribal groups, and educational institutions, the bill seeks to make farming knowledge and resources more readily accessible to a diverse range of agricultural stakeholders. Emphasis is placed on supporting historically underserved groups and ensuring language accessibility.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several significant issues. Firstly, the broad definition of "farmer-to-farmer network" might lead to confusion regarding which associations qualify for support, potentially limiting effective implementation. Secondly, the criteria for selecting entities for cooperative agreements lack specificity. This vagueness could lead to subjective decision-making or favoritism in selecting eligible entities. There is also concern about the latitude given to the Secretary of Agriculture to designate "any other entity" eligible for cooperation, which might lack transparency.

Moreover, assistance providers have flexibility regarding which responsibilities they choose to fulfill, which could lead to inconsistencies across programs. The vague phrasing, such as "innovative activities" for subaward purposes, leaves room for varied interpretation and potentially inefficient resource allocation. Additionally, the conditional requirement for language assistance may result in discrepancies, potentially leaving some non-English speakers inadequately supported.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the bill underscores a governmental effort to facilitate agricultural knowledge exchange, which could enhance sustainable practices across farming sectors. By fostering farmer-to-farmer networks, the bill aims to promote conservation objectives and site-specific practices, potentially benefiting overall environmental health and agricultural productivity.

For specific farmers, especially those within historically underserved communities, the bill could offer direct support and resources that might have been previously inaccessible. The possibility of receiving mentorship and technical knowledge from peers presents the potential for increased educational opportunities and performance efficiency.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The bill could positively change the landscape for beginning, veteran, and socially disadvantaged farmers by prioritizing their access to resources and education, directly addressing some equity gaps in agriculture. Nonprofit organizations and educational institutions might benefit from opportunities to engage in cooperative agreements, potentially expanding their influence and capability to serve their communities.

However, smaller entities or those lacking strong connections may feel disadvantaged by the subjective nature of the selection processes, particularly if selection criteria remain non-transparent. The variability allowed in program focus and priorities might also lead some stakeholders to question the effectiveness of the support received, especially if assistance providers do not align on key objectives.

In conclusion, the "Farmer to Farmer Education Act of 2024" presents a strategic effort to leverage farmer networks for technical assistance, with intended benefits for both agricultural practices and community support. However, its success will largely depend on clear guidelines and transparent implementation to address the identified issues and ensure equitable benefits.

Issues

  • The designation process by the Secretary for 'any other entity' as eligible for cooperative agreements or subawards in Section 2 is unclear, potentially allowing favoritism or lack of transparency.

  • The broad definition of 'farmer-to-farmer network' in Section 2 might lead to difficulties in determining eligibility, potentially causing disputes over which groups can participate.

  • The prioritization criteria for selecting eligible entities to enter into cooperative agreements in Section 2 lack specific benchmarks, which could lead to subjective decision-making, potentially disadvantaging smaller or less connected entities.

  • The responsibilities for providers of assistance in Section 2 are listed as 'not less than 2 of the following actions,' introducing variability which might result in lack of focus and consistency across assistance programs.

  • The clause 'Other actions determined appropriate by the Secretary' in Section 2 is vague, giving significant discretionary power to the Secretary without clear guidelines, which might lead to arbitrary decision-making.

  • The requirement for language assistance in Section 2 is conditional ('to the greatest extent practicable'), which could result in inconsistent application and potentially leave non-English speakers without necessary support.

  • The use of general language such as 'innovative activities' for subaward activities in Section 2 may lead to varied interpretation and possibly inefficient resource allocation.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that it can be officially called the “Farmer to Farmer Education Act of 2024”.

2. Delivery of technical assistance Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the Food Security Act of 1985 to include support for farmer-to-farmer networks by allowing the Secretary of Agriculture to form agreements with certain eligible entities, such as nonprofit organizations and local governments, to help farmers share knowledge and resources. It prioritizes assistance for historically underserved groups and includes provisions for subawards to further boost these networks and provide language assistance when necessary.