Overview
Title
To provide for the conveyance of certain Federal land at Swanson Reservoir and Hugh Butler Reservoir in the State of Nebraska, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 8413 is a plan to give some special land in Nebraska to the local counties so they can take care of it and use it for fun things like playing outside or helping animals. But before they get the land, the counties have to prove they can manage it well and pay for it fairly.
Summary AI
H.R. 8413 aims to transfer ownership of certain federal lands at Swanson Reservoir and Hugh Butler Reservoir in Nebraska to the local counties—Hitchcock County and Frontier County. The bill outlines the terms for these land transfers, including conditions to ensure the land is used for public purposes such as recreation and wildlife preservation. Each county must demonstrate its capability to manage the land, compensate the federal government based on fair market value, and follow various legal and environmental regulations during and after the transfer process. The bill also includes provisions to handle liabilities and the management of the lands until the transfer is finalized.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The bill, titled the “Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs Land Conveyances Act,” proposes the transfer of specific federal lands in Nebraska located at the Swanson Reservoir and Hugh Butler Reservoir to Hitchcock County and Frontier County. The objective of these land transfers is to allow local management and development while ensuring continued public access and preservation of the natural environment.
General Overview
This legislative proposal sets out a process by which federal lands associated with two well-known reservoirs in Nebraska could be transferred to local county control. It outlines the specifics of the land to be transferred and the criteria that counties must meet to assume control. This includes prohibitions on subdividing the land, ensuring that management retains a focus on public and recreational uses, and various conditions that must be adhered to regarding environmental and operational impacts of the land.
Significant Issues
Several key issues arise from the proposal:
Assessment and Appraisal Procedures: One of the most critical components detailed within the proposed bill is the determination of "fair market value" for the lands in question. The bill contains complex definitions and procedures but lacks clear, standardized guidelines, which could lead to disputes and varied interpretations.
Technical and Financial Capacity: The counties must demonstrate their capacity to manage the lands effectively; however, the bill does not specify clear criteria or benchmarks for evaluating this capacity. This gap could lead to subjective assessments and potential inconsistencies in approvals.
Liability Concerns: There are significant liability and indemnification clauses, particularly concerning potential flooding. The breadth of these provisions might pose risks to the counties, carrying potential legal and financial liabilities.
Transitional Uncertainties: Interim management before the completion of transfers may cause uncertainty. The continued operation of current management agreements adds complexity to the transition process.
Broad Legal Compliance: The counties will need to comply with several significant and potentially unspecified laws, demanding comprehensive resources and capacities, which could create a burdensome legal overhead on these counties.
Public Impact
For the general public, particularly those residing in or near Hitchcock and Frontier counties, this bill could bring both benefits and challenges. On one hand, local management of these federal lands could lead to more community-focused development and recreational facilities, potentially enhancing local enjoyment and accessibility. On the other hand, any disagreements over land appraisals or increases in local taxes to support new management structures might provoke public concern.
Stakeholder Impact
For Hitchcock and Frontier Counties, this legislation could solidify more localized and potentially more tailored management of significant local resources. This could provide opportunities to develop recreational areas and improve local tourism. However, the lack of specified criteria for capacity assessment and the open-ended nature of certain costs and liabilities might strain county resources and result in future challenges or costs, without guarantees of additional federal support or protections.
Overall, while the intent to devolve land management to local authorities seems promising for community-centric development, it is crucial that clear guidelines, robust safeguards, and thorough oversight mechanisms are in place to mitigate potential financial and operational challenges for the counties involved. The success of this initiative largely depends on transparent processes, open communication with local stakeholders, and careful planning to balance development with preservation and public access.
Issues
The criteria for evaluating the technical capability and financial ability of Hitchcock County and Frontier County to manage the lands proposed for conveyance are not specified, potentially allowing for subjective or inconsistent assessments (Section 3).
The definition and calculation of 'fair market value' for the land to be conveyed are complex and potentially open to varied interpretations, leading to disputes about compensation and transparency of the appraisal process (Section 2, Section 3).
The bill allows counties to reconvey land if there's an 'impending adverse impact,' but what qualifies as such an impact is not clearly defined, leaving room for misinterpretation and potential legal challenges (Section 3).
The liability and indemnification clauses regarding flooding and other potential damages are broad and may not sufficiently protect the interests of Hitchcock County and Frontier County, potentially leading to financial and legal issues for these counties (Section 4).
The interim management requirements are dependent on the completion of the conveyance and related agreements, which could raise uncertainties if the process is delayed (Section 5).
The use of technical language and references without sufficient explanation, such as the 'Flood Control Act of 1944' and complex land descriptions, might make the bill inaccessible to the general public and stakeholders (Section 2, Section 3, Section 4).
The bill mandates compliance with several unspecified laws by the counties post-conveyance, potentially leading to an overwhelming compliance burden (Section 6).
There is a lack of clarity regarding the exact nature and fairness of existing management agreements, such as the 'Lakeview Lodge Management Agreement,' which could lead to biased contracts favoring specific operators (Section 2, Section 5).
The absence of specified caps on legal, survey, and administrative costs can lead to excessive expenditures borne by Hitchcock County and Frontier County without budgets being defined (Section 3).
Specific conveyance provisions, such as the prohibition on subdivision, raise questions about flexibility for the counties in managing their lands effectively under changing circumstances (Section 3).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Act is officially named the “Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs Land Conveyances Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section provides definitions for various terms related to land management and agreements in Nebraska, such as what constitutes "fair market value," specific land areas like "Hugh Butler Reservoir" and "Lakeview Lodge Permitted Concession Land," as well as the roles of officials like the "Secretary of the Interior" and the counties involved in the management agreements.
3. Conveyances of Federal land to Hitchcock County and Frontier County, Nebraska Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill outlines a plan for transferring specific federal lands in Nebraska to Hitchcock County and Frontier County, detailing requirements like prohibiting land subdivision, establishing agreements for roles and responsibilities, ensuring management capabilities, and addressing costs and management methods for these lands to maintain public purposes and natural preservation. Additionally, it restricts further land reconveyance, except to publicly recognized entities, emphasizing public access and consistent land use.
4. Effect on reservations, easements, and other rights Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
A conveyance under this bill, related to the Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs, must respect existing rights and reservations, including those for mineral rights and easements. The United States is not liable for flood damages unless caused by its actions before the bill's enactment, and entities accepting land must protect the U.S. from related claims. Temporary flooding isn't considered government property taking.
5. Interim requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section states that until the requested Federal land is transferred as described in earlier parts of the bill, the agreements and permits related to Lakeview Lodge, Red Willow, and Swanson will continue to be valid and enforced.
6. Compliance with other laws Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Before any federal land is given away, the Secretary must follow certain environmental and historic preservation laws, like the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act. Once the land is transferred, Hitchcock County and Frontier County have to follow all related federal, state, and local laws to manage the land properly.