Overview
Title
An Act To provide for the conveyance of certain Federal land at Swanson Reservoir and Hugh Butler Reservoir in the State of Nebraska, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to give some land near two lakes in Nebraska to local counties so they can use it for fun and nature activities, but they have to pay a fair price and keep using the land for these purposes. If the deal isn't made in three years, the government will keep taking care of the land as it does now.
Summary AI
H.R. 8413 authorizes the transfer of specific federal lands at Swanson Reservoir and Hugh Butler Reservoir in Nebraska to local counties, Frontier County and Hitchcock County. It outlines the conditions for these transfers, emphasizing that the counties must maintain management practices similar to the existing ones and may only use the lands for public purposes, like recreation and conservation. The transfer requires fair market payment, while reserving specific rights and easements to the United States. If title transfer agreements are not established within three years, the federal government will continue managing the lands according to current laws.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled the "Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs Land Conveyances Act," is designed to manage the transfer of certain federal lands surrounding the Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs in Nebraska to local entities, specifically Hitchcock County and Frontier County. The primary aim is to convey land that is part of federally managed concessions and cabin sites for local county management. The process involves negotiations for title transfer agreements, ensuring lands are maintained for public use, and imposing guidelines for future conveyances.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the most notable concerns is the bill's three-year timeline for the Secretary of the Interior to finalize title transfer agreements, which may unnecessarily delay land transfers and associated benefits to local stakeholders. In addition, the bill requires that the land cannot be subdivided, potentially limiting county flexibility in future development or land use. The fair market value determinations are tied to complex appraisals, posing a risk of protracted negotiations and financial strain on counties due to associated administrative costs. The language and technicality of the bill, particularly regarding reservations, easements, and liability, may be difficult for the general public to decipher, raising potential issues of transparency and understanding among stakeholders.
Impact on the Public
The bill's impact on the public can produce mixed outcomes. On one hand, transferring federal lands to county control could empower local governance, potentially leading to more community-tailored management of resources. However, the rigid conditions on land conveyances and public usage requirements could restrict innovative land development. The exclusion of environmental considerations could concern those keen on preserving natural habitats, pointing to potential oversight in addressing environmental impacts.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Specific stakeholders such as the counties involved—Hitchcock and Frontier—face both benefits and burdens. Obtaining control over these lands could allow for better integrated local development plans. However, the financial obligations to manage and appraise these lands could prove challenging, especially if counties face financial constraints or if there is disagreement over land valuation. Federal stakeholders might benefit from offloading management responsibilities, but the restrictions and financial agreements may prevent counties from fully leveraging their newfound control.
For environmental advocates, the absence of explicit measures addressing environmental impacts within the bill could be seen as a negative, potentially jeopardizing conservation efforts around the reservoirs. Conversely, entities in favor of public access and recreation services might appreciate the bill's emphasis on maintaining lands for public use and recreation purposes. The complex legal language likewise presents barriers to comprehension and potential disputes, necessitating clarity from legal and government actors to ensure stakeholders are well-informed and appropriately guided through the land conveyance processes.
Issues
The timeline for the Secretary to enter into a title transfer agreement is set at 3 years, which could unnecessarily delay the conveyance process (Section 3).
The requirement that the conveyed land cannot be subdivided might limit flexibility for future uses by Hitchcock County and Frontier County, potentially hindering local development or adaptation to future needs (Section 3).
The determination of fair market value through a complex appraisal process and potential disputes over this value could lead to prolonged negotiations and financial burdens on the counties (Section 3).
Costs including survey and administrative expenses are imposed on the counties, which might be burdensome if they cannot afford these costs or if there's a lack of clarity on what happens if they cannot pay (Section 3).
The section specifying the conditions under which future conveyances of the requested Federal land can occur is complex and may create confusion among stakeholders, thereby causing potential legal disputes or misunderstandings (Section 3).
The document includes highly technical and dense language, particularly regarding reservations, easements, and other rights, which makes it difficult for laypersons to understand the full implications (Section 4).
The definition of 'fair market value' is complex and may be difficult for some to understand, which could lead to challenges in assessing property values accurately and fairly (Section 2).
The bill does not explicitly address environmental impacts of conveyances or easements, which could raise concerns among environmental stakeholders (Section 4).
The interim requirements allow for management agreements to remain in force for up to three years, potentially leading to inefficiencies or outdated practices if not regularly reviewed (Section 5).
The absence of specific guidance on what happens if title transfer agreement negotiations are still ongoing after the interim period ends could result in legal and management uncertainties (Section 5).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The Act is officially named the “Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs Land Conveyances Act.”
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
In this section of the bill, terms are defined related to various properties and agreements in Nebraska. These include the "fair market value" of property rights, specific locations like "Frontier County" and reservoir areas, and various management and title transfer agreements for land development and concessions.
3. Conveyances of Federal land to Hitchcock County and Frontier County, Nebraska Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The bill section outlines the process for transferring ownership of certain federal lands to Hitchcock County and Frontier County in Nebraska. It requires cooperation with federal guidelines for appraisals, management plans, and the conditions under which the lands can be further conveyed, highlighting that future transfers must maintain public access and be managed by public or recognized governmental entities.
4. Effect on reservations, easements, and other rights Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines the conditions under which certain federal lands can be transferred, including preserving existing rights and easements, respecting operational needs of specific river basins, and imposing restrictions like prohibiting new builds in designated areas. It also specifies that the United States won't be held liable for certain flood damages, requires parties to indemnify the U.S. against claims related to reservoir operations or land conveyances, and clarifies that temporary flood damage won't be considered a government taking.
5. Interim requirements Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
During the interim period, certain management agreements and permits will stay active until either three years after the law passes or until Federal land is transferred, whichever is later. If a county doesn't finalize a title transfer within those three years, the Secretary will manage specific lands according to the law.