Overview

Title

To establish in the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency of the Department of Homeland Security a task force on artificial intelligence, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

Imagine there's a group called CISA that wants to keep computers safe, and they want to make a special team to check if using smart robots (AI) is safe too. This team will help make sure the robots do good things without causing problems, and after five years, their job will finish.

Summary AI

H. R. 8348, known as the "CISA Securing AI Task Force Act," proposes the creation of a task force within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to focus on artificial intelligence (AI) safety and security. The task force will work on aligning CISA's AI efforts, collaborating with other groups, assessing security initiatives, addressing AI workforce gaps, and advising on potential cyber risks linked to AI deployments. It will also ensure that AI-related efforts respect privacy and civil liberties, and will provide regular reports to Congress on its activities. This act will expire five years after its enactment.

Published

2024-05-10
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-05-10
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8348ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
703
Pages:
4
Sentences:
15

Language

Nouns: 228
Verbs: 56
Adjectives: 50
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 20
Entities: 57

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.78
Average Sentence Length:
46.87
Token Entropy:
4.75
Readability (ARI):
28.18

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, titled the "CISA Securing AI Task Force Act," is designed to address the growing intersection between artificial intelligence (AI) and cybersecurity within the United States government. Introduced in the House of Representatives as H.R. 8348, the bill mandates the establishment of a Task Force focused on enhancing the safety and security of AI technologies within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) under the Department of Homeland Security. By coordinating AI-related efforts and initiatives, the Task Force aims to achieve a cohesive approach to AI safety, security, and broad governmental integration over a period of five years before the Act sunsets.

General Summary of the Bill

The bill tasks CISA with creating a Task Force specifically targeted at addressing AI-related safety and security challenges. It outlines a range of functions for the Task Force, including ensuring the secure development and deployment of AI technologies, advising on AI-related cyber risks, and promoting secure adoption practices. A notable element of the bill is its directive for the Task Force to deliver biannual briefings to Congressional committees detailing its activities. It emphasizes coordination within the agency and with external stakeholders to fill any workforce gaps and align federal AI safety and security strategies.

Summary of Significant Issues

The bill raises several important issues that may affect its implementation and impact. First, it lacks clear stipulations for the budget or resources required to establish and sustain the Task Force, which could lead to unplanned financial burdens. The responsibilities assigned to the Task Force are also very broad and might overlap with existing duties within CISA, leading to potential inefficiencies or redundancy.

The use of vague language—such as unspecified "Agency safety and security initiatives, guidance, and programs"—creates room for ambiguity in what the task force should focus on, which could complicate implementation efforts and accountability. Strategies to address the AI workforce gaps are not well-defined, leaving uncertainty about how new personnel challenges will be met. Moreover, the bill calls for publishing an AI use inventory without detailing how resources will be allocated for this task. Lastly, the absence of specific criteria to ensure compliance with privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties standards presents a risk of potential legal and ethical challenges.

Broad Impact on the Public

If well-implemented, this bill could significantly impact the public by enhancing the security and trustworthiness of AI applications, reducing potential AI-driven cyber risks. Improved security measures and workforce enhancements could lead to more robust protections against cyber threats, benefiting the general public by safeguarding sensitive data and critical infrastructure. However, without clear funding mechanisms and efficient allocation of resources, there could be financial inefficiencies that might indirectly affect taxpayers.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For government agencies, particularly CISA, the bill could mean increased responsibilities and the need for additional resources and expertise in AI-specific areas. This could necessitate hiring or training personnel in a competitive environment, thereby expanding their workforce capabilities. Stakeholders such as tech companies and cybersecurity firms might experience increased collaboration opportunities with the government to develop secure AI technologies through partnerships instrumented by the Task Force.

Conversely, unclear privacy and civil rights protections could negatively affect individuals should the Task Force's efforts fail to meet established legal standards. Businesses that rely heavily on AI might have to adjust their development and deployment strategies in accordance with new security guidelines, which could either enhance their competitive edge or increase operational costs, depending on how the guidelines are framed and enforced.

Overall, while the CISA Securing AI Task Force Act aims to address critical AI-related security challenges, it will require careful planning and execution to effectively serve the intended public and stakeholder interests while avoiding administrative and financial pitfalls.

Issues

  • The section on the task force (Section 2) lacks a specified budget or funding source for establishing and maintaining the Task Force, which could lead to unplanned or excessive financial spending.

  • The responsibilities outlined for the Task Force in Section 2 are very broad and could overlap with existing duties within the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, resulting in inefficiencies or redundancy in resource allocation.

  • Section 2 uses vague language such as 'relevant Agency safety and security initiatives, guidance, and programs', which does not clearly specify the scope, potentially leading to implementation challenges and accountability issues.

  • The methods to address 'artificial intelligence workforce gaps' in Section 2 are not detailed, leaving significant ambiguity on how to address workforce deficiencies effectively.

  • Section 2's call for supporting the publication of the Agency’s artificial intelligence use inventory might require significant resources, yet it does not lay out how these resources will be provided or managed, raising concerns about resource allocation without oversight.

  • Criteria to ensure that the Agency's efforts meet privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties standards are not provided in Section 2, which might lead to legal and ethical challenges in holding the Agency accountable for these standards.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides the short title of the Act, which is called the "CISA Securing AI Task Force Act."

2. Task force on securing artificial intelligence Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The bill requires the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to create a Task Force focused on ensuring the safe and secure use of artificial intelligence (AI) within the agency and in broader governmental initiatives. The Task Force will coordinate AI efforts, fill workforce gaps, advise on potential cyber risks, and report on its activities every six months, with the Act expiring five years after its enactment.