Overview
Title
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend certain telehealth flexibilities with respect to hospice care under the Medicare program, and to establish a modifier for recertifications of hospice care eligibility conducted through telehealth.
ELI5 AI
This bill wants to let doctors and nurses keep using video calls to help take care of very sick people at home until 2026. It also says that later on, doctors need to tell Medicare when they use video calls for this care.
Summary AI
H.R. 8278, introduced by Mrs. Miller of West Virginia, proposes changes to the Social Security Act to allow more flexibility for telehealth in hospice care under Medicare. The bill extends the duration of these telehealth flexibilities until December 31, 2026, with certain exceptions for specific cases requiring in-person oversight or in restricted areas. Additionally, it mandates that telehealth recertifications for hospice care include specific codes to indicate the use of telehealth starting two years after the bill's enactment.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
The proposed legislation, titled the "Hospice Recertification Flexibility Act," seeks to amend the Social Security Act to extend and modify the use of telehealth in hospice care under the Medicare program. Introduced in the House of Representatives on May 7, 2024, this bill primarily aims to extend certain telehealth flexibilities for hospice care and to introduce a requirement for documenting telehealth encounters using specific codes or modifiers.
General Summary of the Bill
The bill intends to extend telehealth flexibilities for hospice care until December 31, 2026. However, after January 1, 2025, these flexibilities will not apply in specific situations: if the patient is in an area with restrictions on new hospice program enrollments, if receiving care from a provider under scrutiny, or if the telehealth service is provided by non-certified practitioners. Additionally, two years post-enactment, physicians must document telehealth encounters in hospice recertifications with specific codes as determined by the Secretary.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary concerns is the ambiguity and complexity associated with exceptions to the telehealth flexibilities, which could lead to confusion and inconsistent application. There is also concern over the broad discretion given to the Secretary to specify the codes or modifiers required for telehealth claims. This could result in varying interpretations and administrative complications.
Furthermore, the planned delay of two years before enforcing the coding requirement for telehealth recertifications might hinder the timely adoption of telehealth services, potentially delaying benefits to patients who need them. Lastly, the bill lacks a clear strategy for training or resources, which could affect how effectively healthcare providers implement these changes.
Impact on the Public
For the general public, especially those relying on hospice care, the extension of telehealth services can be seen as a positive move, potentially providing easier access to care and reducing the need for travel. However, the uncertainty regarding the long-term extension of these services could affect patients' and caregivers' ability to plan for continued telehealth use in the future. Patients in moratorium areas or those receiving services from scrutinized providers might feel the negative consequences more acutely as they could lose telehealth access sooner.
Impact on Stakeholders
Hospice Providers: The extension of telehealth services may facilitate more efficient service delivery and expand care access. However, ambiguities and potential complexities in compliance requirements could pose administrative burdens and require additional resources for proper implementation and training.
Healthcare Professionals: For doctors and nurse practitioners, the new coding requirements might demand further administrative work and system updates. The potential lack of guidance or training could lead to implementation challenges and impact care efficiency. Delays in implementing the telehealth modifier requirement could dampen their ability to fully integrate telehealth into their practices.
Patients and Families: Those utilizing hospice care services might benefit from improved access and efficiency due to telehealth options. However, families might face challenges during the transition periods, particularly in regions where exceptions might exclude telehealth use earlier than otherwise extended.
Overall, while the bill aims to enhance care delivery through telehealth, careful attention to implementation details and additional support for involved parties will be critical to ensuring that the intended benefits of the legislation are fully realized.
Issues
The extension of telehealth flexibilities only through December 31, 2026 (Section 2) might create uncertainty for hospice providers and patients who rely on telehealth services, potentially affecting long-term planning and investment in telehealth services.
The broad discretion given to the Secretary to determine appropriate codes or modifiers (Section 3) could lead to inconsistent application or interpretation, raising concerns about potential administrative complexity and fairness in implementation.
The exceptions detailed in Section 2 regarding individuals in moratorium areas, providers under enhanced oversight, and unenrolled physicians may lead to confusion and selective application, complicating compliance and raising potential fairness concerns.
The delay of two years before implementing telehealth modifiers for recertifications (Section 3) might restrict timely patient access to telehealth services, thereby delaying benefits that could improve patient care.
There is no outlined evaluation or review mechanism in Section 3 to ensure that telehealth use is effective and maintains care quality, which might result in unintended negative impacts on patient care standards.
The bill lacks details about additional training or resources for physicians or nurse practitioners (Section 3), which could impact the effective implementation of telehealth certifications and patient outcomes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the bill establishes that it can be officially called the “Hospice Recertification Flexibility Act.”
2. Extension of certain telehealth flexibilities Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section modifies the Social Security Act to extend certain telehealth flexibilities until December 31, 2026, but specifies that these flexibilities do not apply after January 1, 2025, for patients in areas with a moratorium on hospice program enrollment, patients receiving care from providers under enhanced oversight, or encounters with hospice practitioners who are not properly enrolled.
3. Establishment of modifier for recertifications of hospice care eligibility conducted through telehealth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section adds a requirement to the Social Security Act for hospice care recertification encounters conducted via telehealth. Starting two years after the enactment of the Hospice Recertification Flexibility Act, physicians or nurse practitioners must include specific codes or modifiers in their claims for such telehealth encounters as designated by the Secretary.