Overview
Title
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to improve the financial aid process for homeless and foster care youth.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 8273 wants to make it easier for kids who don't have a home or are in foster care to get help paying for college. It asks schools to choose special helpers to support these kids in finding things like housing and jobs, and makes sure they can pay the same as other students who live in the same state.
Summary AI
H. R. 8273 aims to make the financial aid process easier for homeless and foster care youth who want to attend college by changing parts of the Higher Education Act of 1965. The bill includes requirements for schools to have staff to help these students access resources like housing and tutoring, and it encourages schools to prioritize them for on-campus jobs. It also ensures that homeless and foster youth can pay in-state tuition at public colleges and requires schools to report on how they are helping these students. Additionally, the bill directs the Secretary of Education to provide training and guidance to schools on supporting homeless and foster youth.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The proposed bill seeks to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to enhance the financial aid process for homeless and foster youth. It includes a myriad of provisions aimed at breaking down barriers these vulnerable groups face in accessing higher education. Among the initiatives are changes to provide clearer definitions of key terms related to foster and homeless youth, improvements to student support services, priorities within Federal work-study programs, and requirements for institutions to provide specific resources and assistance. Additionally, it calls for increased guidance and training for educational administrators and emphasizes data transparency regarding homelessness status determinations.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several concerns are raised by the proposed changes. Firstly, the requirement for higher education institutions to designate liaisons and craft plans for housing access might incur extra administrative costs, particularly burdening smaller colleges. Notably, there is no clear allocation for additional funding to accommodate these new roles.
The removal of specific subsections without explanation creates potential confusion about whether crucial definitions or protections have been lost, leaving legislative intent unclear. Another point of concern lies in the area of student status verification for providing in-state tuition benefits; this process might lack uniformity across institutions.
The bill lacks details regarding the funding necessary for implementing its comprehensive guidance and training requirements. As such, questions are raised about the financial impact on educational institutions and their capacity to fulfill these obligations effectively.
Moreover, the amendment involves intricate language and legal references, making it potentially difficult for the public to grasp the intended changes. This complexity also extends to definitions and processes surrounding the status of homeless youth, leading to possible inconsistencies in application and extended pending determinations.
Impact on the Public
The bill could significantly impact public access to higher education, notably benefiting homeless and foster youth. By formalizing assistance and prioritizing resources for these groups, the legislation aims to mitigate the struggles these students often face, hopefully leading to higher college attendance and completion rates.
However, larger institutions may absorb the administrative demands better than smaller ones, potentially widening institutional disparities. The lack of explicit funding provisions risks overwhelming education providers, which could inadvertently limit the intended improvements in support for homeless and foster youth.
For the general public, the promise of more individuals completing postsecondary education could equate to a more educated workforce contributing positively to society. But, careful implementation and monitoring are necessary to prevent the overburdening of resources.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Homeless and foster youth stand to gain significantly from the bill's provisions as it focuses on reducing hurdles to educational access and success. With adequate institution-level support and financial aid adjustments, these students may find it easier to participate and succeed in postsecondary programs.
Educational institutions, particularly small and mid-sized colleges, might face challenges in meeting the administrative and personnel requirements without increased resources. The responsibility to adhere to amendments without clear guidance on funding may strain their existing capabilities.
Moreover, organizations and professionals involved in student welfare and educational support, such as liaisons and ombudsmen, might experience an increased workload. While their roles will be critical in supporting youth, the need for clarity on procedures and processes remains crucial to prevent inconsistent application of the law.
In conclusion, while the bill holds potential benefits for improving access to higher education for marginalized groups, attention must be given to funding, clarity, and consistent implementation to ensure its success without overburdening educational institutions.
Issues
Section 4: The requirement for institutions to designate a liaison and create plans for housing access could lead to increased administrative costs, particularly challenging for smaller institutions, without clear funding provisions for these mandates.
Section 2: The removal of subsections (m) and (n) from Section 480 raises potential concerns about eliminating important definitions or protections without explanation, leading to ambiguity about legislative intent.
Section 14: The bill references an act not yet enacted, causing potential timing or eligibility issues, and lacks clarity on how institutions should verify the status of homeless or foster youth, leading to inconsistent implementation.
Section 15: The bill does not specify the cost or funding source for guidance, training, or reports required, raising concerns about financial implications and the effectiveness of these initiatives.
Section 6: The amendment's requirement for entities to describe outreach activities without specific criteria could lead to variability in effectiveness, potentially limiting the support for homeless and foster youth.
Section 13: The amendment's language is complex and lacks clarity on standards for determining homelessness, which could lead to inconsistent determinations and lengthy pending states.
Section 3: Student Loan Ombudsman responsibilities are vaguely defined, potentially leading to inconsistent application of procedures for resolving complaints regarding student independence.
Section 11: The lack of clarity concerning the term 'barriers' and the absence of specific enforcement mechanisms might undermine the effectiveness of the bill's provisions targeting outreach and retention of homeless and foster youth.
Section 8: The additional reporting requirements for entities involved in student support services for homeless and foster youth could increase administrative burdens without clear guidance on effective metrics or outcomes.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the document specifies that the law can be referred to as the "Higher Education Access and Success for Homeless and Foster Youth Act of 2024."
2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965, adding definitions for "foster care youth," who are under state or tribal care, and "homeless youth" and "unaccompanied youth" as defined by the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. It also makes a technical correction by removing certain subsections.
3. Student loan ombudsman assistance for homeless and foster youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965 aims to improve support for homeless and foster youth by requiring a Student Loan Ombudsman to quickly handle complaints about a student's independence. The Ombudsman must work with experts like child welfare agencies and local liaisons for homeless youth to address these issues.
4. Liaisons and Access to Housing for Homeless and Foster Youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act to require colleges to help homeless and foster youth access housing and support services. It mandates that colleges designate a staff member to assist these students, prioritize their access to campus housing, and provide relevant information on their websites to help them secure financial aid and housing resources.
5. Serving homeless and foster youth in Federal TRIO programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 402A of the Higher Education Act of 1965 requires applicants for federal TRIO program funds to specifically identify and reach out to homeless and foster youth, ensuring they have access to services like mentoring and tutoring. It also adds homeless and foster youth to the groups that receive these services under subsection (f)(2).
6. Serving homeless and foster youth in talent search Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act to ensure projects serving homeless and foster youth review policies to eliminate participation barriers, describe outreach activities, and provide reports on these youth at the project's end.
7. Serving homeless and foster youth in upward bound Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text describes amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965, focusing on improving access to the Upward Bound program for homeless and foster youth. These changes require entities running the program to remove barriers for these groups, describe outreach activities, and submit a report on their participation at the project's end.
8. Serving homeless and foster youth in student support services Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The text outlines amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965 to better support homeless and foster youth in student services. It mandates that projects review and update policies to eliminate obstacles, detail outreach plans in their applications, and submit a report on their efforts with these groups at the project's end.
9. Serving homeless and foster youth in educational opportunity centers Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
Section 9 of the bill modifies the Higher Education Act to better serve homeless and foster youth in educational centers by ensuring project policies remove barriers to their participation, requiring outreach plans to these youth, and mandating a final report about their involvement.
10. Reports and evaluations Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section mandates that any group running a project under certain sections of the Higher Education Act must submit a report at the end of their project. This report should include the number of homeless and foster youth helped and describe effective strategies used.
11. Serving homeless and foster youth in gaining early awareness and readiness for undergraduate programs Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends the Higher Education Act to better support homeless and foster youth in preparing for college. It requires projects to remove participation barriers for these youth, report on outreach activities, and facilitate their participation through partnerships and supportive policies.
12. Priority for Federal work-study programs for homeless and foster youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965 requires that federal work-study programs give priority to hiring students who are experiencing homelessness or who are in foster care.
13. Data transparency on the number of pending requests for determination by homeless youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to Section 483 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 requires institutions to report the number of requests from homeless youth that are still pending because a decision has not been made about their status, ensuring there's transparency about how many cases are left undetermined.
14. In-State tuition rates for homeless and foster youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendment to the Higher Education Act of 1965 ensures that homeless and foster youth are charged the same in-state tuition rates as residents when attending public colleges and universities in their state. This change takes effect in the first full award year following the passage of the Higher Education Access and Success for Homeless and Foster Youth Act of 2024.
15. Secretarial support and guidance for homeless and foster youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines new requirements for the Secretary to provide guidance and professional development to help institutions and financial aid administrators support homeless and foster youth. It mandates the issuance of revised guidance within 120 days and annual training programs, as well as a report to Congress every five years on effective strategies used by institutions.
124. Secretarial support and guidance for homeless and foster youth Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section outlines that the Secretary must provide updated guidance and training to support homeless and foster youth in higher education. Within 120 days of the Act's enactment, the Secretary is required to revise guidance for aid administrators, conduct annual professional development sessions, and report effective strategies used by educational institutions and staff to Congress.
16. Effective date Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The amendments in the text will become effective as if they were part of the original FAFSA Simplification Act and in line with certain updates provided by later acts, meaning those changes are considered part of the original law from the start.