Overview

Title

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to assess the suitability and feasibility of designating certain land as the Lahaina National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 8219 is about checking if a special piece of land in Hawaii should become a protected place called the "Lahaina National Heritage Area." People who know a lot about the area's history and culture will help decide if this is a good idea.

Summary AI

H. R. 8219 proposes a study to evaluate if the Lahaina area in Maui, Hawaii, should become a National Heritage Area known as the "Lahaina National Heritage Area." The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to work with local and state officials and organizations to conduct this study. The study will focus on assessing the suitability and feasibility of the designation and involve collaboration with historical societies and tourism agencies. This legislative measure aims to preserve and promote the cultural and historical significance of Lahaina.

Published

2024-05-01
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-05-01
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8219ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
344
Pages:
2
Sentences:
12

Language

Nouns: 127
Verbs: 22
Adjectives: 13
Adverbs: 0
Numbers: 10
Entities: 36

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
28.67
Token Entropy:
4.44
Readability (ARI):
15.97

AnalysisAI

The Lahaina National Heritage Area Act, introduced in the House of Representatives, proposes a study to evaluate the potential designation of Lahaina, Maui as a National Heritage Area. This effort involves the Secretary of the Interior working alongside state and local bodies, including historic preservation organizations and tourism offices. Such designation would likely recognize the cultural, historical, and natural significance of Lahaina, potentially fostering preservation and tourism.

Key Issues

A significant concern surrounding this bill is the absence of a specified budget for the proposed study. Without clear financial parameters, there is a risk of overspending or mismanagement of resources. Public institutions and government officials often have multiple demands on their budgets, and undefined financial commitments can strain resources and lead to inefficient use of taxpayers' money.

Additionally, the bill lacks clarity on which organizations and governmental agencies should be consulted as "other appropriate organizations." This vagueness creates room for potential favoritism or exclusion of key stakeholders, thereby skewing the study's outcomes or undermining its integrity.

Moreover, the bill does not establish a timeline for the study, which could lead to prolonged or stalled processes. Without a clear deadline, there is a risk that this initiative could face indefinite delays, which limits strategic planning and may stall potential benefits that the designation could bring.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the general public, particularly those residing in Lahaina and Maui County, this study represents a step towards acknowledging and potentially enhancing local heritage tourism. If successful, it might lead to increased tourism, which could benefit local businesses and create jobs, thus boosting the local economy. However, without specific guidelines, the study's progress is uncertain, and the financial implications might affect how public funds are allocated elsewhere.

Local stakeholders, like historical societies and tourism offices, stand to gain from increased visibility and support for preservation efforts. However, the lack of consultation guidelines could also exclude important local voices from the decision-making process, affecting the study's quality and community buy-in.

Potentially, the Lahaina National Heritage Area Act could positively influence Lahaina by preserving its rich historical tapestry and stimulating economic growth through tourism. That said, successfully navigating the concerns regarding budget, stakeholder involvement, and timeline is crucial to ensure the study's efficiency and fairness. Addressing these issues head-on could mitigate potential drawbacks and maximize benefits for all parties involved.

Issues

  • The text in Section 3 does not specify the cost or budget for the Lahaina National Heritage Area study, which could lead to potential overspending or lack of budget oversight.

  • The phrase 'other appropriate organizations and governmental agencies' in Section 3 is vague and could allow for favoritism without clear guidelines on which entities are appropriate.

  • Section 3 does not specify the timeline or deadline for completing the study, which might result in delays or indefinite studies.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that this legislation will be known as the "Lahaina National Heritage Area Act".

2. Definitions Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section provides definitions for key terms used in the Act: "Secretary" refers to the Secretary of the Interior, "State" refers to Hawaii, and "study area" refers to the census-designated place of Lahaina in Maui County, Hawaii.

3. Lahaina National Heritage Area study Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The Secretary is tasked with conducting a study, in collaboration with relevant state and local officials and organizations, to determine if the area should be designated as the "Lahaina National Heritage Area," following specific guidelines in the United States Code.