Overview

Title

To create a civil action for non-consensual sexual protection barrier removal, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H. R. 8188 is a proposed law that wants to help people if someone secretly takes off a protective cover during grown-up time without asking. It says this is wrong, and people can go to court to ask for money or help if it happens to them.

Summary AI

H. R. 8188, known as the “Stealthing Act of 2024,” aims to address the issue of non-consensual removal of sexual protection barriers, commonly referred to as "stealthing." The bill allows individuals to file civil lawsuits against those who commit stealthing, which is recognized as a violation of autonomy and trust, as well as a risk for pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The legislation acknowledges that stealthing is a form of sexual abuse and seeks to provide victims with the opportunity to recover damages, including compensatory and punitive damages, and other relief deemed appropriate by the court.

Published

2024-04-30
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-30
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8188ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
955
Pages:
5
Sentences:
25

Language

Nouns: 271
Verbs: 72
Adjectives: 101
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 36
Entities: 56

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.34
Average Sentence Length:
38.20
Token Entropy:
4.90
Readability (ARI):
21.60

AnalysisAI

The proposed legislation, referred to as the "Stealthing Act of 2024," is intended to address a disturbing form of sexual violence known as stealthing. This term refers to the non-consensual removal of a condom or other protective barrier during sexual activity, which can lead to significant emotional and physical harm, including risks of unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The bill seeks to establish a framework for individuals to bring civil lawsuits against perpetrators of such acts, thereby allowing victims to claim compensatory and punitive damages. The proposed legislation also aims to support efforts at the state level, such as the one initiated by California, thus providing a legal avenue for victims across the United States.

Summary of Significant Issues

One notable issue within the bill is the somewhat ambiguous definition of what constitutes a "sexual protection barrier." While condoms and dental dams are directly mentioned, the term also includes "any other barrier against sexual fluids," a vague descriptor that might lead to interpretive challenges in legal proceedings. Clearer definitions could prevent confusion and ensure consistent application of the law.

A related point of complexity surrounds the conditions under which the non-consensual removal of sexual protection barriers is tied to interstate or foreign commerce. This connection to federal jurisdiction is crucial for the enactment of federal civil action but may be difficult for the layperson to grasp fully, potentially limiting accessibility and enforceability.

The penalties section leaves room for judicial discretion in awarding relief, which can result in varied outcomes for similar cases. Without specific criteria, this could lead to inconsistencies in legal judgments.

Finally, the bill does not specify any statute of limitations for civil actions. This omission might cause uncertainties around the timeframe within which victims can bring forward their lawsuits, potentially affecting the timely pursuit of justice.

Public Impact

For the general public, the introduction of this bill could represent an important step in addressing personal rights and safety during consensual sexual activity. By recognizing stealthing as a civil violation, the legislation could encourage victims to seek justice and potentially deter future offenses.

However, understanding and navigating the complexities of the bill might pose a challenge without legal assistance. This aspect could limit its practical effects unless accompanied by public education efforts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Victims of Stealthing: For survivors, the ability to pursue civil action could provide a sense of empowerment and opportunity for recompense. However, navigating the legal system may still present challenges, particularly for those lacking resources or access to legal support.

Legal Professionals: The bill presents new opportunities and challenges for attorneys, requiring specialized knowledge in sexual violence and civil law. Legal professionals may need to offer accessible guidance to clients navigating this emerging area of law.

Perpetrators: Individuals found to have engaged in stealthing could face significant financial penalties, alongside potential reputational damage. This consequence might act as a deterrent but also raises questions about the adequacy of such measures in preventing the behavior.

Health Advocates and Educators: This bill has implications for public health initiatives, potentially underscoring the importance of educating people about their rights and responsibilities concerning sexual conduct and protection use.

Overall, while the Stealthing Act of 2024 is designed to enhance legal recourse against a specific form of sexual violence, its effectiveness will depend significantly on its clarity, public awareness, and the accessibility of legal avenues for all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • The term 'sexual protection barrier' in Section 3 could benefit from more precise definition, especially regarding what 'any other barrier against sexual fluids' might entail, to avoid ambiguity. This precision is crucial given the potential legal implications and the need for clarity in legal contexts.

  • The Findings in Section 2 are largely composed of studies and statistics, but do not propose actionable steps or legal language that could give a clearer legislative direction. Including more information on the methodologies of these studies would also validate their credibility.

  • Section 3(b) outlines several circumstances relating to interstate or foreign commerce, which may be complex for individuals to fully understand without legal expertise, impacting the accessibility and enforceability of the law.

  • The penalties section (3(c)) does not specify the criteria for 'such other relief as a court may deem appropriate,' leading to potential inconsistencies in how the law could be applied or interpreted.

  • There is no mention of a statute of limitations for civil action in Section 3, which might lead to confusion or legal challenges regarding the timing of lawsuits.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the bill states that this piece of legislation is officially named the "Stealthing Act of 2024".

2. Findings Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

Congress recognizes stealthing, the non-consensual removal of condoms during sex, as a form of sexual violence and highlights its emotional and physical risks. Findings include statistics on its prevalence and the legal efforts, starting with California's law, to allow victims to seek civil damages for this violation of individual rights.

3. Non-consensual sexual protection barrier removal Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section outlines that anyone can sue someone who takes off a sexual protection barrier, like a condom, without consent during sexual activity, and specifies various circumstances under which this conduct affects interstate or foreign commerce. The person suing can seek damages and other legal remedies, and definitions are provided for terms like "non-consensual sexual protection barrier removal" and "sexual protection barrier."