Overview
Title
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the scheduled reduction in the deduction for foreign-derived intangible income.
ELI5 AI
The bill wants to keep a special tax rule that helps businesses save money when they make things that are sold in other countries. Instead of changing this rule to save less money, the bill says to keep the savings the same as they are now.
Summary AI
H.R. 8184, titled the “Growing and Preserving Innovation in America Act of 2024,” aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The bill proposes to repeal the planned reduction in the deduction for foreign-derived intangible income. This means that instead of decreasing the percentage of the deduction, the current deduction rate of 37.5 percent will be maintained. The change will take effect once the bill is enacted.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, titled "Growing and Preserving Innovation in America Act of 2024," proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Specifically, it seeks to repeal a scheduled reduction in the tax deduction for foreign-derived intangible income (FDII). The current legislation envisions decreasing this deduction percentage from 50% to 37.5%. This bill would instead halt this reduction, thereby maintaining a higher deduction rate. The amendment would take effect immediately upon enactment.
Summary of Significant Issues
Several issues are associated with this legislative proposal. Firstly, the bill amends a specific section of the tax code, yet it lacks an explicit explanation regarding the fiscal and economic implications of changing the deduction rate from 50% to 37.5%. As a result, there might be ambiguity regarding the broader financial impact on both businesses and government revenues.
Moreover, the bill might raise fairness concerns. By targeting a specific tax code provision that benefits those with foreign-derived intangible income, it may appear to favor particular businesses or sectors, which could lead to debates over equity and appropriate benefits from tax policies. The lack of detailed reasoning or rationale on the necessity of this deduction change further amplifies the opacity, potentially preventing stakeholders from fully understanding the legislative intent.
Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders
Broad Public Impact:
For the general public, changes in tax legislation, such as the one proposed in this bill, can indirectly affect economic health and governmental resources. By maintaining a higher deduction for foreign-derived intangible income, businesses with international operations might have more resources to invest domestically, potentially leading to job creation or economic growth. However, if these businesses pay less in taxes due to higher deductions, the government might face reduced tax revenues, impacting public services or requiring adjustments elsewhere in fiscal policy.
Specific Stakeholder Impact:
For businesses dealing with foreign-derived intangible income, the bill offers clear benefits. By maintaining the deduction at a higher percentage, these businesses would have lower taxable income, leading to reduced tax liabilities. This might enable them to allocate more resources towards innovation or expansion efforts. However, critics may argue that this bill disproportionately benefits large multinational corporations, potentially leading to unfair competitive advantages over smaller, domestically-focused businesses.
In conclusion, while the bill aims to support innovation by preserving deduction rates for foreign-derived intangible income, it must be weighed with considerations of its broader fiscal implications and fairness among various stakeholders. Understanding the complexities of such tax legislation remains crucial to discerning its long-term impact on both the national economy and different sectors.
Issues
The amendment could have significant fiscal implications by changing the deduction percentage for foreign-derived intangible income from 50 percent to 37.5 percent without explicitly defining the broader impact on businesses or government revenue, leading to potential ambiguity and controversy (Section 2).
The bill might favor certain businesses or sectors that benefit from foreign-derived intangible income deductions, sparking fairness concerns since it targets a specific section (Section 250(a)(3)) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 2).
The amendment lacks an explanation or rationale for why the deduction change is necessary, which could prevent the public and legislators from understanding the intent behind it, potentially leading to legislative and ethical debates (Section 2).
While the text is straightforward in amending the deduction percentage, the lack of context or justification makes it potentially unclear for those unfamiliar with existing tax code provisions, increasing the risk of misinterpretation or misinformation (Section 2).
The short title section provides only minimal information about the bill, omitting details regarding the provisions or implications of the Act, which hinders a complete understanding of the potential issues, such as complexity or political motives behind the bill (Section 1).
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
This section states that the official name for this legislation is the “Growing and Preserving Innovation in America Act of 2024.”
2. Repeal of scheduled reduction in the deduction for foreign-derived intangible income Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section eliminates a planned reduction in a tax deduction for foreign-derived intangible income by changing a part of the tax code to allow a deduction at a rate of 37.5% instead of 50%. This change will take effect immediately once the Act is enacted.