Overview

Title

To amend the Small Business Act to include requirements relating to new small business entrants in the scorecard program, and for other purposes.

ELI5 AI

H.R. 818, called the "SPUR Act," is a plan to change the rules for how the U.S. government gives small businesses a score for their work. It focuses on giving more chances to new small businesses, especially those owned by women and veterans, without spending extra money.

Summary AI

H.R. 818, also known as the "Small Business Procurement and Utilization Reform Act of 2025" or the "SPUR Act", aims to update the Small Business Act by adding new requirements for how the scorecard program evaluates federal agencies. The bill introduces criteria for counting the number of new small businesses, particularly those owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, women, and service-disabled veterans, to which federal contracts are awarded. Additionally, it defines a "new small business entrant" and ensures that no extra funds are authorized to implement these changes, aligning with the CUTGO (Cut-As-You-Go) principle.

Published

2025-01-28
Congress: 119
Session: 1
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2025-01-28
Package ID: BILLS-119hr818ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
3
Words:
553
Pages:
3
Sentences:
13

Language

Nouns: 158
Verbs: 46
Adjectives: 38
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 18
Entities: 36

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.04
Average Sentence Length:
42.54
Token Entropy:
4.73
Readability (ARI):
21.96

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The "Small Business Procurement and Utilization Reform Act of 2025," or the "SPUR Act," aims to make changes to the Small Business Act by updating the scorecard program requirements. This bill seeks to ensure that new small businesses, particularly those owned by veterans, women, and economically disadvantaged individuals, are prominently tracked and supported in receiving government contracts. Additionally, no new allocations of funds are authorized, in compliance with the CUTGO (Cut-As-You-Go) policy.

Summary of Significant Issues

One primary issue addressed in the bill is the definition of a "new small business entrant," which is limited to businesses that have never received a prime contract from a federal agency. This narrow definition might exclude businesses with minimal federal contracting experience or those that have previously contracted with non-federal entities.

Another consideration is the lack of clarity on how the changes, particularly in the scorecard system, will affect financial implications. Without clear information, there could be potential problems in resource allocation, impacting the bill's effectiveness.

The language used in the bill, specifically regarding the scorecard and compliance with CUTGO, is somewhat technical. This may lead to confusion among readers unfamiliar with governmental procedures and fiscal terminology, which can hinder understanding of the bill's full impact.

Potential Public Impact

Broadly, this bill could enhance opportunities for newly established small businesses to engage in federal contracting, which can be beneficial for economic diversity and innovation. By emphasizing the entry of small businesses owned by veterans and disadvantaged individuals, the bill seeks to bolster inclusivity within government procurement processes.

However, due to the restriction on additional spending, the Act's implementation could be challenging if unforeseen expenses arise, potentially affecting the effective advancement of its goals.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Small Businesses and Entrepreneurs: For owners of small businesses, especially those who are veterans, women, or economically disadvantaged, the bill could provide improved access to government contracts. This might foster growth and visibility for diverse businesses in competitive markets.

Federal Agencies: Agencies might face additional administrative work to implement the new scorekeeping and comparative analysis requirements. While this may improve transparency, it may also increase bureaucratic overhead if no additional funds are allocated to support these efforts.

Public Understanding: For the general public, particularly those interested in business opportunities, the complexity of the bill’s language could pose a barrier to understanding how specifically the government aims to support new business entrants.

In summary, the SPUR Act represents a significant policy effort to support new small businesses in federal procurement. It addresses inclusivity in economic opportunities but also poses potential challenges in definition clarity and administrative burden without additional funding.

Issues

  • The definition of 'new small business entrant' in Section 2 may be too narrow, only including businesses that have never been awarded a prime contract by any Federal agency. This could exclude small businesses that have limited experience or contracts with non-federal entities, potentially impacting fairness and competition.

  • The text in Section 2 does not provide explicit information about how the new measures and definitions will impact the budget or spending. This lack of clarity may lead to oversight in terms of financial implications and could affect how resources are allocated to support small businesses.

  • The language used in defining 'scorecard' and the measures it should include in Section 2 could be overly complex, making it difficult for individuals without prior knowledge to understand how the system is meant to evaluate federal agencies' efforts. This complexity may lead to misunderstandings about government evaluations.

  • Section 3 states that no additional amounts are authorized to be appropriated, which may limit the ability to carry out the Act effectively if unforeseen expenses arise. This could hinder the Act's implementation and the intended support for new small business entrants.

  • The section detailing compliance with CUTGO in Section 3 does not specify what CUTGO stands for or entails, which might create ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with the term. This could lead to misunderstandings about financial compliance requirements.

  • The lack of detail in Section 1's short title makes it difficult to assess potential issues regarding spending, favoritism, or ambiguity. Without a comprehensive description of the 'SPUR Act,' important aspects remain undefined and open to interpretation, limiting oversight and public understanding.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of this act states that it can be referred to as the "Small Business Procurement and Utilization Reform Act of 2025" or simply as the "SPUR Act".

2. Modifications to scorecard requirements Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section modifies the requirements of the Small Business Act's scorecard system by including new metrics. It now requires tracking the number of new small businesses, like those owned by veterans or women, that receive government contracts and comparing these numbers to the previous year. It also provides definitions for terms such as "new small business entrant" and "scorecard."

3. Compliance with CUTGO Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

This section states that no extra money is authorized to be spent to implement the Act or its changes, ensuring compliance with the CUTGO rule, which requires that any increase in spending be offset by cuts elsewhere.