Overview

Title

To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide for certain exceptions to the mileage limitation for Appalachian development highway system projects.

ELI5 AI

This bill wants to change a rule about building more roads in a certain area called the Appalachian region. It says that if it's really important, they might allow building more road miles than usually allowed, but only if they check and say it's okay to do so.

Summary AI

H. R. 8170 proposes changes to title 40 of the United States Code to allow exceptions to the mileage limits for the Appalachian Development Highway System. The bill enables the Appalachian Regional Commission to approve additional mileage for highway construction projects if necessary, based on evaluations under the National Environmental Policy Act. It also specifies that states can apply for this mileage exemption by submitting the required information to the Commission.

Published

2024-04-30
Congress: 118
Session: 2
Chamber: HOUSE
Status: Introduced in House
Date: 2024-04-30
Package ID: BILLS-118hr8170ih

Bill Statistics

Size

Sections:
2
Words:
492
Pages:
3
Sentences:
11

Language

Nouns: 153
Verbs: 32
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 19
Entities: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.30
Average Sentence Length:
44.73
Token Entropy:
4.65
Readability (ARI):
24.39

AnalysisAI

General Summary of the Bill

The proposed legislation titled "Appalachian Regional Continuing Development Act of 2024," introduced in the House of Representatives, seeks to amend title 40 of the United States Code. Its primary aim is to offer certain exceptions to existing mileage limitations for highway projects in the Appalachian development area. This initiative involves making amendments to Section 14501 of title 40, which will enable the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) to approve projects that exceed the current mileage limits if it is justified through processes aligned with the National Environmental Policy Act. Essentially, this bill is focused on providing additional flexibility in developing highway infrastructure in the Appalachian region.

Summary of Significant Issues

Several issues arise from the provisions outlined in the bill:

  1. Potential Over-Extension and Fiscal Concerns: The bill permits exceptions to mileage limits for highway projects, which could result in projects extending beyond necessary bounds. This raises concerns about potential wasteful government expenditure and highlights the need for fiscal responsibility.

  2. Lack of Clear Criteria: The criteria and process for the Appalachian Regional Commission to approve mileage waivers are not clearly defined in the bill. This ambiguity could lead to decisions that lack transparency or lead to favoritism, which could undermine public trust in fair governance.

  3. Undefined Application Evaluation Standards: While the bill requires states to submit applications for mileage waivers, it does not provide clear guidelines for how these applications will be evaluated. This lack of specificity could result in inconsistencies or biases in decision-making.

  4. Complex Language Hindering Transparency: The use of complex legal language and structure may make it challenging for the general public, particularly those without a legal or specialized background, to fully understand the bill. This can limit public accessibility and engagement with legislative processes.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

Broad Public Impact

The bill's overarching intent is to improve infrastructure within the Appalachian region by offering more flexible mileage limitations for highway projects. This could lead to enhanced transportation routes, potentially spurring economic development and improving access for communities in the region. However, if projects extend unnecessarily due to lenient waiver approvals without strict oversight, this could result in wastage of public funds, which might detract from overall public benefits.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • State Governments and Transportation Authorities: They may benefit from increased flexibility in planning and developing highways, leading to more effective transportation solutions. However, without clear guidelines, these entities might face challenges in navigating the waiver application process.

  • Local Communities in the Appalachian Region: Improved infrastructure might enhance connectivity and drive economic opportunities. Yet, if projects are extended inefficiently, local communities might bear the brunt of potential disruptions during prolonged constructions without proportional benefits.

  • Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC): The Commission bears the responsibility of applying discretion in granting waivers. Effective frameworks and clear criteria are crucial for the ARC to maintain accountability and public trust in its decision-making process.

In conclusion, while the bill strives to advance infrastructure development through flexibility, careful consideration and clear guidelines are essential to prevent fiscal inefficiencies and ensure fair and transparent governance.

Issues

  • The provision in Section 2 allowing an exemption from mileage limitation under subsection (b) may lead to potential over-extension of projects, which could result in wasteful government spending. This issue is significant as it relates to the fiscal responsibility and efficient use of public funds.

  • Section 2 lacks clear definitions and criteria for the Appalachian Regional Commission's approval of mileage limitation waivers, leading to potential favoritism or lack of transparency. This might concern the public who are interested in fair and transparent governance.

  • The application process outlined in Section 2 for obtaining a mileage waiver does not specify the standards or guidelines that the Commission will use for evaluating applications, leading to possible inconsistency or bias. This is significant for stakeholders affected by the highway development projects.

  • The complex language and structure in Section 2 might make it difficult for a layperson to understand the provisions, potentially hindering transparency and accessibility of the legislative process to the general public. This could be an ethical issue in terms of legislative clarity and public inclusion.

Sections

Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.

1. Short title Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The first section of the Act states that it can be officially referred to as the "Appalachian Regional Continuing Development Act of 2024" or simply the "ARC Development Act of 2024."

2. Mileage limitation exemption for certain Appalachian development highway system projects Read Opens in new tab

Summary AI

The section amends the United States Code to allow the Appalachian Regional Commission to grant exemptions from mileage limitations for certain highway projects in the Appalachian region. If a route for such a project exceeds the set mileage limit due to the alignment process, the excess mileage can be added to the project's allowable limit, making it eligible under the development highway system criteria.