Overview
Title
To prohibit the breaching of federally operated dams if such breach would result in the replacement energy resource occupying additional acreage, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 8159 is a rule that says we can't take down big dam walls if replacing the energy they make would need a lot more land. Before deciding, important people have to check how much land the dam affects.
Summary AI
H.R. 8159, known as the “Abandoning Inconsistent and Rash Environmental Solutions Act” or the “ACRES Act,” seeks to prevent the breaching of federally operated dams if the replacement energy source would require significantly more land, at least 5% larger than the dam's occupied area. The bill mandates that before considering dam breaching, the Secretary of the Army, in collaboration with the Secretary of the Interior, must conduct a study assessing the land area affected by the dam.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 8159, titled the "Abandoning Inconsistent and Rash Environmental Solutions Act" or the "ACRES Act," is a legislative proposal from the 118th Congress, introduced to the House of Representatives on April 29, 2024. The bill seeks to prohibit the breaching of federally operated dams if, as a result of such an action, the energy resource intended to replace the dam would occupy more land by at least 5% compared to the original dam. Additionally, if dam breaching is contemplated, a mandatory study must be coordinated by the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior to evaluate the land occupied by the dam.
Summary of Significant Issues
A key issue with the ACRES Act is its restriction on replacing energy resources that require more land than the dam they substitute. This provision could obstruct necessary ecological restoration efforts or transitions to greener energy sources. Another concern is the vagueness around determining who assesses whether the replacement resource occupies more land, leading to potential legal ambiguities. Moreover, the required joint study by the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior could introduce bureaucratic delays, possibly stalling crucial environmental and energy projects. Additionally, the emotional language in the bill's title might inflame debates, potentially polarizing stakeholders from different sides of environmental policy discussions.
Impact on the Public
The ACRES Act could have significant repercussions for the public, particularly in areas reliant on federal dams for energy, water management, and recreation. On the one hand, prohibiting additional land use for energy replacement may protect against unnecessary land conversion, preserving natural habitats and landscapes. Conversely, the bill's restrictions could thwart advances in clean energy, impacting efforts to combat climate change and reducing the nation's ability to shift to sustainable power sources quickly.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Stakeholders such as environmental advocates and renewable energy companies might face negative impacts due to this bill. The constraints placed on land use for alternative energy resources could hinder projects aimed at achieving environmental sustainability and reducing carbon footprints. Indigenous groups and local communities who might support dam removal for ecological or cultural reasons could be affected if such projects are stalled.
On the other hand, stakeholders such as agricultural communities and industries dependent on consistent water management from dams might view the bill positively. They could benefit from the ensured continuation of dam operations without the threat of land expansion for replacement resources. Additionally, property owners and developers could support the bill if they fear that changes in land use due to dam removal might limit development opportunities or affect property values.
In summary, while the ACRES Act aims to address concerns over land use efficiency, it also poses challenges that could significantly impact environmental policy and the transition toward renewable energy. Balancing the various interests and concerns involved will be crucial for policymakers working on this legislation.
Issues
The prohibition on breaching federally operated dams if the replacement energy resource requires more land (Section 2) could significantly impact environmental and energy policy. The restriction might impede necessary environmental measures or energy transitions intended to address climate change or ecological restoration.
The lack of specificity in determining who decides if the replacement energy resource exceeds the 5% land increase threshold (Section 2) could lead to legal ambiguities and challenges, potentially allowing for inconsistent or biased decision-making.
The requirement for a coordinated study between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior (Section 2) may introduce bureaucratic delays or inter-agency conflicts, which could hinder timely decision-making crucial for environmental and energy projects.
The language in Section 1 and the short title of the Act uses terms such as "inconsistent" and "rash", which carry subjective judgments that may polarize stakeholders and complicate legislative discussions.
Potential ethical concerns arise from the bill potentially prioritizing land use efficiency over other significant factors like biodiversity, cultural heritage, or carbon emissions reductions, which could lead to public opposition.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of this Act states its official short title, which can be referred to as either the "Abandoning Inconsistent and Rash Environmental Solutions Act" or the "ACRES Act".
2. Prohibition on breaching of certain dams Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section prohibits the Secretary of the Army from breaching any federal dam if the replacement energy resource will take up more land than the dam itself by at least 5%. If breaching a dam is considered, a study must be conducted to analyze the dam's land usage in partnership with the Secretary of the Interior.