Overview
Title
To repeal the Corporate Transparency Act.
ELI5 AI
H.R. 8147 is a proposal to cancel a rule that was made to help people see who owns big companies, so it might make it harder to catch bad guys hiding their money.
Summary AI
H. R. 8147 seeks to repeal the Corporate Transparency Act, which was originally part of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. The bill, introduced by Mr. Davidson and others, calls for the removal of amendments made by the Corporate Transparency Act. It also includes technical changes to U.S. Code titles affected by the original Act, focusing on striking out specific references that supported the repealed law.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
The bill, identified as H.R. 8147, is an initiative by the 118th Congress to repeal the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). This legislation is titled the "Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act." Introduced by Mr. Davidson and co-sponsored by several other representatives, the bill aims to completely annul the Corporate Transparency Act, along with making necessary technical adjustments to associated financial regulations. The CTA was initially part of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 and was intended to improve corporate transparency and combat financial crimes such as money laundering.
Summary of Significant Issues
One of the primary issues with the bill is the repeal of critical financial transparency and anti-money laundering provisions without clear documentation of their impacts. The absence of explanatory context and consideration for the potential consequences of removing these legal frameworks may be detrimental, leading to misunderstandings among stakeholders and the general public. The bill relies heavily on technical amendments and cross-references, making it difficult for those unversed in legal terminology to understand the implications fully. Such ambiguity could lead to concerns about potential legal and compliance gaps following the repeal of the CTA.
Impact on the Public
The repeal of the Corporate Transparency Act may have broad implications for the public, particularly regarding financial transparency. By eliminating regulations that require corporations to disclose beneficial ownership and other key information, the bill could potentially make it more challenging to track illegal financial activities such as money laundering. This rollback might foster an environment where illicit activities could proceed with less oversight, which could impact public trust in corporate and financial institutions.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Several stakeholders may experience significant effects if this bill is enacted. On the positive side, some businesses, especially smaller entities, might benefit from reduced administrative burdens and compliance costs associated with the Corporate Transparency Act's reporting requirements. However, on the negative side, financial regulators and law enforcement agencies might find it harder to track and combat financial crimes in the absence of the CTA's provisions. This scenario could also disadvantage consumers and investors if the lack of transparency leads to an increase in fraudulent activities or financial misconduct. Additionally, global stakeholders interested in the United States' commitment to financial transparency may view this repeal as a step back in combating international financial crimes.
Issues
The repeal of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) may have significant implications for financial transparency and the prevention of illegal activities such as money laundering. The lack of clear explanation in Section 2 about the impacts of repealing the CTA can lead to misunderstandings among the public and stakeholders.
Repealing the CTA might leave a gap in the legal framework intended to enhance corporate transparency, which could create compliance issues or legal loopholes, thereby potentially facilitating illicit financial activities. This issue is mentioned in Section 2.
The complex legal language and cross-references to other laws (such as the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020) may hinder non-experts, including small business owners and the general public, from understanding the effects and purposes of these legal changes, as noted in Section 2.
The bill's reliance on technical amendments without providing context or explanations about which entities will be affected and how, might lead to a lack of informed debate or scrutiny over its potential consequences, as seen in Section 2.
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Short title Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The first section of the act is the short title, which states that the legislation can be referred to as the "Repealing Big Brother Overreach Act."
2. Repeal Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section repeals the Corporate Transparency Act and removes specific references to it from several legal codes, specifically those related to financial regulations and the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020. It also makes related technical changes to ensure that the legal texts remain consistent.