Overview
Title
To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit the Secretary concerned to furnish mortuary services in the case of certain citizens of the United States who die outside of the United States, and for other purposes.
ELI5 AI
H. R. 8133 is a plan that lets special people in charge help bring home and take care of someone from the U.S. who has passed away in another country if the local options are not good, as long as the military has room to do so.
Summary AI
H. R. 8133 aims to change title 10 of the United States Code to allow the Secretary concerned to provide mortuary services for certain U.S. citizens who die outside the U.S. The bill specifically allows for such services if local commercial options are deemed undesirable, or if the military mortuary facility has enough capacity to handle additional services. The amendment takes effect immediately upon the bill's enactment and applies to deaths occurring on or after that date.
Published
Keywords AI
Sources
Bill Statistics
Size
Language
Complexity
AnalysisAI
General Summary of the Bill
H.R. 8133 is proposed legislation aimed at amending title 10 of the United States Code. The bill seeks to authorize the Secretary concerned to provide military mortuary services to certain U.S. citizens who die outside the United States. Significantly, the bill expands the eligibility for these services to civilians when local mortuary services are deemed unsuitable or if the military has the necessary resources and personnel to offer service. This legislation would become effective immediately upon enactment and would apply to deaths occurring from that date forward.
Summary of Significant Issues
The bill introduces several potential issues that need to be addressed for a more effective implementation:
Subjectivity of 'Undesirable': The bill allows military mortuary services to be used if local commercial services are considered "undesirable." The term is subjective and could lead to varying interpretations, potentially causing misuse. Clear criteria should be established to define what qualifies as "undesirable" to prevent arbitrary application.
Expansion and Oversight of Services: Extending mortuary services to civilians without a solid regulatory framework might broaden the intended scope significantly. Without established oversight or cost control measures, there could be uncontrollable expenses and an undue burden on military resources.
Budgetary Implications: The bill does not outline budgetary impacts or oversight mechanisms. This absence could lead to unchecked financial expenditure, with implications for taxpayers and the military budget.
Resource Management Challenges: There is no clear plan on how mortuary facility capacity and personnel management will be handled. This could strain existing resources, particularly if military mortuary facilities are overwhelmed by expanded responsibilities.
Impact of Effective Date: The effective date provision does not account for situations where mortuary arrangements might already be in progress before the enactment of this bill, potentially resulting in legal conflicts or confusion.
Broad Public Impact
The bill could lead to significant public interest, particularly for families of U.S. citizens who pass away abroad. Offering military mortuary services in situations where local services are insufficient can provide crucial support during difficult times. However, there is a concern that imprecise criteria could lead to inconsistent applications across different cases.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For families of deceased citizens, the bill provides a potentially better and more reliable option for handling mortuary affairs when overseas. This can be particularly beneficial in countries with inadequate mortuary infrastructure.
However, for military institutions, this bill could increase operational demands and possibly require additional resources if a significant number of civilians begin using these services. Without appropriate checks and balances, this could dilute the military's core mission focus.
Ultimately, while H.R. 8133 seeks to address an important service gap for citizens abroad, its successful implementation hinges on resolving the highlighted issues to ensure fairness, cost control, and resource efficiency.
Issues
The bill allows military mortuary services to be used if local services are deemed 'undesirable,' which is subjective and could lead to misuse or overreach. Clear criteria are needed to define 'undesirable' to prevent potential abuses. [Section 1(a)(1)]
The amendment could lead to an expansion of mortuary services to civilians without appropriate oversight and checks, potentially increasing costs without a clear ceiling. [Section 1(a)(3)]
The bill does not establish clear guidelines or oversight mechanisms for budgetary impacts, possibly leading to unchecked spending. [General/Implicit in Section 1]
There is no assessment or management plan for the capacity and personnel of mortuary facilities, potentially leading to resource management issues. [Section 1(a)(3)]
The amendment's effective date does not consider situations where mortuary arrangements might have begun prior to its enactment, possibly causing legal confusion. [Section 1(b)]
Sections
Sections are presented as they are annotated in the original legislative text. Any missing headers, numbers, or non-consecutive order is due to the original text.
1. Military mortuary services for civilians Read Opens in new tab
Summary AI
The section amends a law to allow military mortuary services to be used for civilians when local services are unsatisfactory or unavailable and extends eligibility to anyone not covered previously if the military facility has the capability. The changes will apply to deaths occurring on or after the law's enactment date.